• Home Page
  • Relationship Between Determinism And Free Will

Relationship Between Determinism And Free Will

Great Essays
Show More
Free will is a characteristic unique to persons, allowing them control of their actions. Often brought up with determinism, it is the most commonly disputed topic of metaphysics. Determinism the philosophical proposition that every action or event is determined by a perpetual chain of pre-determined events or preceding occurrences. This means that under determinism, it is not possible for any spontaneous or random events to occur. Determinism and free will go together due to the fact that they are quite incredibly arguable. For instance, one may say that the problem with determinism is whether all events are caused by a pre-determined event. Addressing this problem would require understanding the correlation between causation and freedom, beginning a debate between determinism and free will. …show more content…
Either they accept determinism and see free will as an illusion, or they believe in free will, and find determinism to be untrue. Roderick M. Chisholm is one of these people, but we will not be discussing his work here. Other philosophers known as compatibilists, believe that the two ideas may accompany one another. This is the view we shall focus on. British philosopher, A. J. Ayer, defends the view that causal determinism is compatible with free will and moral responsibility. Henceforth, I shall try to do the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How Did Charles Arthur Campbell Encourage Libertarianism
    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages

    How Did Charles Arthur Campbell Encourage Libertarianism

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Chisholm's Model Of Indeterminism
    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chisholm's Model Of Indeterminism

    Determinism is a philosophical idea that attempts to place all events that occur as inevitable as they are predetermined by previous events and the laws of nature. However there are many who came to be known as indeterminists who reject the notion that free will is absent from the process that causes events to occur. Indeterminists believe that there are possible events that have different probabilities of occurring based on human beings free will. Then Chisholm’s view of the agent-casual theory presents humans as always going through a decision process when making an action that leads up to an event they work through their desires in first and second order volitions and then they act. These actions are free from previous events and cannot…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Consequence Argument Analysis
    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Consequence Argument Analysis

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Similarities Between Determinism And Libertarianism
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities Between Determinism And Libertarianism

    Take a poker player. They associate winnings with probabilities, now if we were under the assumption of a determinist then these probabilities would be useless as regardless of if the probability was high or low the outcome would be set. This is fine until you understand that probabilities contradict a determinist view. This is because even if the next card that’s flopped is based on probability, the actual event is total random as it’s not a given that the highest probability will occur. Now, how does this equate to the idea that we have free will.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism
    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Free Will, Praise, And Blame Analysis
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Free Will, Praise, And Blame Analysis

    The discussion of morals and moral responsibility is deep-seated in the classic philosophical repertoire. A closely related matter, and a frequent objection to moral responsibility, is determinism, the idea that given the initial state and laws of the universe, all future events and outcomes are completely determined. Over the course of this paper, I describe a particular theory for how moral responsibility can exist even in a deterministic universe. One prominent view in the realm of moral responsibility is the libertarian stance.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ayer Compatibilism Analysis
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ayer Compatibilism Analysis

    In this paper, I argue that Ayer’s reasoning of compatibilism is false. The reason this is true is because his explanation and reasonings of the topic are completely contradictory. Throughout the essay, I will call into question what Ayer believes to be true, while at the same time, try to “take a walk in his shoes,” to see where he is coming from and to dig deeper into why Ayer believes his theories on the topic are correct. Ayer holds the belief that free will and determinism can both be true at the same time. He states his belief of free will as when, “it is implied that I could have acted otherwise,” and believed that I could have acted otherwise, then i am said to be morally responsible for what i have done (Ayer).…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sider's Argument On Free Will And Determinism
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sider's Argument On Free Will And Determinism

    According to Sider, determinism is the belief that every event is caused by a previous event. For example, when a ball rolls on the ground, we assume that some force (perhaps a child) caused it to start rolling. Determinism claims that all events are like the rolling ball; that is, all events are caused by previous events. Free will is much more difficult to define.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism Vs Free Will In Communication
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Determinism Vs Free Will In Communication

    This means that we as humans have freedom to respond to our circumstances and that reaction may be different then another person who faced the exact same circumstances. With free will each person has control over their own actions and their actions are voluntary. Determinism means that behavior is caused by heredity…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Determinism And Free Will
    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Determinism And Free Will

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's Argument For Hard Determinism
    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Paul Holbach's Argument For Hard Determinism

    Determinism says the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. Pereboom and Holbach are two of those philosophers. His first part of his argument is that we humans have no control over our birth or physiology.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Soft Determinism And Libertarianism
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Soft Determinism And Libertarianism

    The philosophical question of free will has been debated for years and has spawned many theories, papers and never ending arguments. Soft determinism along side with hard determinism and libertarianism make up the three theories of free will. By focusing on the works of Stace and Cahn, I aim to prove that the idea of soft determinism is not an inherently flawed argument and that free will and determinism are compatible. In the argument of free will, soft determinism falls in the middle between hard determinism and libertarianism.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Vs Determinism Essay
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Free Will Vs Determinism Essay

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings