Analysis Of Kant's Universality Law

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) "So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the same time as a principle establishing universal law."(2) "Act so as to treat humanity, whether in your own person in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.'(3) "Act according to the maxims if a universally legislative member of a merely potential kingdom of ends." In other words, Kant argues that particular action requires conscious thought of the rule governing the action. Whether if everyone should follow that rule, and if the rule is acceptable for universal action, it should be adopted. If the rule is unacceptable, then it should be rejected. In order to understand whether or not an action follows Kant's "categorical imperative," we must prescribe those norms that we wish to be universal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When first reading the experiment in regards to rescue I and rescues II, I did not like or want to make a choice, and really, I do not have to make a choice. My job is to tell you what Stuart Mill would do and what Immanuel Kant would do based on their philosophical views of utilitarianism and categorical imperatives respectfully. In Rescue I & II Mill. Utilitarianism is the basic principle to look at what is right and wrong. Depending on the consequences or the outcomes you can select the course of action not which is in your own best interest, but that which takes into account the best interest of others.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s belief on the right of punishment is grand and far reaching. To him, the right of punishment is a supreme power of the government. The government has only the right to punish those who have committed a crime; no punishment may be ordered “merely as a means for promoting another Good” of society or an individual (355). Punishing an innocent man breaches the principles of justice; only criminals (of both private and public crimes) are to be punished. Kant warns us that the Penal Law is a categorical imperative—it is unconditional and non-circumstantial.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Kant, a good will is good not for the reason of its consequences, or the purpose of its action, and what it may achieve. If we are to take out of its con and pro, its value will still remain, and that indicated an action of good will is simply good, it’s an action of viture, and vuntilary. Kant talked about other goods that are desirable because their qualification, and the good consequences brings us pleasure and happiness. Although they may be good, but unlike good will they are not absolutely good. These goods, such as wealth, while it can bring happiness, but they can also become bad, depends on the motivation, wealth could bring greed, unlike good will, these are tools.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant clearly explains the definitions of good, moral and gives examples to help readers understand how these ethics can be applied to daily life. From this work, we learn that what is the law isn’t always good, and morality can conflict with laws within society. A prime example of this can be found in Antigone, when Creon’s law is broken. The relationship between ethics and law isn’t always clear- another example is Nazi germany. Although the law called for the genocide of anyone who was not…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Similar to Aristotle's third point in the guidelines of choosing to act virtuously, Kant believes that people should only act out of a sense of duty. The moral worth is related to the maxim or the principle upon which a person acts by. Maxims determine whether or not an action is correct, and Kant proposes a way to test your maxim in order to confirm that it is morally worthy or immoral. This test is known as the Formula of the Universal Law. This formula in general states that if your maxim can be turned into a universal law that everyone followed and has a negative impact on the world, then your maxim fails to be considered one of moral worth.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine this: a man abducts ten children and stows them away in some unknown location. Eventually, the police are able to locate the man and arrest him. While in police custody, he is interrogated and admits to the kidnappings. Though the criminal refuses to tell where the children are hidden. Due to the high danger that the children face and the urgency of the issue, a rogue cop is pushed to torturing the kidnapper in an attempt to force him to disclose the whereabouts of the minors.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant does however offer a solution in that mankind should “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law (Kant & Abbott 2008).” This definition was applied to perhaps Kant’s most famous work, the categorical imperative. This principle as least gives mankind a way to treat each other that is borrowed from the Bible, where Jesus says during his sermon on the mount, “Do to others as you would have them do to you (2004). ” Kant looked to replace and reframe this idea for his time, and it still a good policy to apply to life…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant would resolve the conflict seen in Law and Order by adhering to the duty principle by testing a maxim of the conflict against his three formulations. These formulations are used to see if a rule is a categorical imperative – that is, a rule that is in tune with the moral law and is acted out of a pure will. Basically, these categorical imperatives are rules that are absolutely universal and unconditional. On the other hand, the impure will comes out of a hypothetical imperative. This is a rule that is conditional and mixes reason with desires and feelings and is concerned with the goods and ends of a decision.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Moral Philosophy

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Moral philosophy is the study of moral judgments or value placed on decision about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or on just. Business philosophy is the standard, principle or policy placed on who may behave outside the norms of organizational culture, emphasis upon ethical behavior enables employees to know how they should react when faced with ethical dilemmas and the consequences of their actions. MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY. As an individual, I believe that keeping a low profile life is very vital to me in a sense that people around me irrespective of their cultural, ethnical and political background.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is there a moral difference between male and female prostitution? I believe that there is not a moral difference, and both male and female prostitution is morally wrong even if the circumstances are that everyone involved is 18 years of age, it is not a form of slavery, and that there is no more duress than most people encounter in difficult lives. To defend my position, I will use the Kantianism to respect people at all times. Throughout my argument, I will focus on the principles and morals behind the decision to sell yourself for sex, rather than the results that follow the act of prostitution. Kant’s ethical theory states that moral duties are absolute and universal.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays