In Act I, Betty Parris, Tituba, and Abigial Williams were accusing people in the village. In the trial case of the Ohio men that were being accused there was a twelve year old boy who wrongly accused the man who pulled the trigger. The child was told by detectives to tell the judge that it was Jackson, otherwise his parents would get sent to jail. Therefor, the boy told the judge it was Jackson. In act one, in The Crucible, Abigail Williams told the girls if they said anything besides what she told them, then they would get hurt. In The Crucible, and "Ohio Men Were Wrongly Convicted Murder After 39 Years Released" there were consequences if the people were guilty of committing the …show more content…
Brendan Eich made people mad in the Mozilla Corporation by donating money to this organization, however it was not until after he was made CEO until anyone said anything about it. People of the corporation signed a petition that Eich should resign as a CEO. The dating website OkCupid even demanded for their customers to stop using Firefox. People have been asking, is this fair? Page, the author of the article, first thought was "McCarthyism". He thinks that he should have his freedom of speech and not get in trouble for what he did. "The rising of a protest of a targeted officer does not mean he has to resign.", said Clarence Page. He thought it was very unfair what was happening to Eich because he should not be getting in trouble for his freedom of speech. He is far from anti-gay, he supports the rest of the gay rights