How different was the Cromwell of the Protectorate from the Cromwell of the Civil Wars?

2037 Words 9 Pages
CRAM Exclusive
Essay Sample: Page 2
own work concludes that it is impossible to define Cromwell as any single previous definition as he carried a characteristic for each description.

The transformation that Cromwell underwent in his career can be explained in his differing policies during the Civil Wars and the years of the Protectorate. When the English Civil War erupted in 1642, Cromwell instantaneously became a significant player in the success of the battles. His natural talent of leadership and his gift of inspirational speeches provided him with the opportunity to perfect his directorship skills that he would demonstrate and employ in his later career as Lord Protector. The Historian Roger Howell identified Cromwell as ‘a leader associated with national vigour, pride and prosperity.’5 Although, there is a clear distinction growth between the inconsequential man present at the turn of the English Civil War to the domineering, authoritative, disciplinary man who emerged during the Protectorate years, the popular patriotic, reformist, religiously radical nature of Cromwell remained constant from the beginning of the Civil Wars to his death in 1658.

The progression of Cromwell character can also be examined in his change of perspective. During the civil war, Cromwell’s sole goal was to
CRAM Exclusive

Related Documents

  • Essay on Oliver Cromwell

    Oliver Cromwell was an English soldier and statesman who led parliamentary forces in the English Civil Wars. He was lord protector of England, Scotland, and Ireland from 1653 to 1658 during the republican Commonwealth. As a general on the parliamentary side of the English Civil War vs. Charles I, Cromwell helped bring about the overthrow of the Stuart monarchy, and he raised his country's status to that of a leading European power since the death of Queen Elizabeth I. Being a man with strong character

    Words: 4278 - Pages: 18
  • Essay on Oliver Cromwell

    Oliver Cromwell Oliver Cromwell is one of the most controversial personalities in England's history. Many scientists have been arguing about him for centuries. Some of them assert that Cromwell was a hypocritical and selfish tyrant, rebelling only for the sake of money and fame, while others argue that he was a real revolutionary and fighter for wellbeing of the English nation. Who is right? What is a reasonable evaluation of Cromwell today? "The English bourgeois revolution of the 17th century

    Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
  • Essay on Oliver Cromwell a Hero or a Villain

    Oliver Cromwell was born in 25 April 1599 in a town in England called Huntington. He went to school at Huntington Grammar School then went to Sydney Sussex Collage at Cambridge. He studied law at Cambridge and then went to London and became the MP for Huntington in 1628 and MP for Cambridge in 1640. In 1630’s Oliver Cromwell became Puritan due to a religious crisis and started to become a Radical Puritan when he elected to represent Cambridge, first in the Short parliament, then in the Long parliament

    Words: 1402 - Pages: 6
  • Oliver Cromwell - Good or Evil? Essay

    Was Oliver Cromwell Good Or Evil After the Civil War, Oliver Cromwell took over as protector of England. There are many different interpretations of him for example, the Jews thought Cromwell was a hero however the evidence more strongly suggests that he was a villain. The poor believe he was a hero because he gave them the extra tax money that was increased on the rich. This shows he had no care for the people that help him in Parliament and in other areas of managing England, such as controlling

    Words: 664 - Pages: 3
  • How Far Was the Outbreak of Civil War in 1455 the Result of Henry’s Inadequacies?

    How far was the outbreak of Civil War in 1455 the result of Henry’s inadequacies? The War of the Roses was a crucial and significant period in the England’s history playing an important role in it. There were many factors which can be seen as the causes of the war. However, it is vital to clarify to what extent its outbreak was caused by Henry’s inadequacies. The powerlessness of Henry VI is a central factor of the outbreak of the war. He was known to be too soft and malleable to the wishes

    Words: 1031 - Pages: 5
  • Essay about Richard Cromwell

    October 19, 2012 Richard Cromwell Have you ever wished that you came from a royal family? Well lucky for Richard Cromwell, his father was a very wealthy man. He was Lord Protector from 25 December 1653 to 3 September 1658 (“Collins, Jacquelin” Dictionary 380). After his father passed away, Richard took his role of Protector. He took office in 1658 immediately after the death of his father, and lasted in office all the way to 25 May 1659 (“Cromwell Richard”Encyclopaedia Britannica). This shows

    Words: 886 - Pages: 4
  • Essay about Civil War Was Inevitable

    One of the most prominent questions in history was, “Was the Civil War inevitable?” many have formed an opinion and a much agreed with conclusion has come about. Secession was inevitable based on the events that occurred from 1800-1859; The War with Mexico, the Acquisition of Oregon and Texas, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were three of these important events that led to the inevitable secession and Civil War. Without these events the Civil War and the secession of the South could have been avoided

    Words: 644 - Pages: 3
  • Was the Civil War actually a Civil War? Was the Revolution actually a Revolution?

    Revolution and the American Civil War are two of the most monumental events in the history of the United States of America. However, their characterization as a “revolution” and a “civil war” has been argued for many years. It has been argued that the American Revolution was not a true revolution, but a civil war, and that the American Civil War was not a civil war but rather America’s time of revolution. Some aspects of the American Revolution support the argument that it was a revolution, while other

    Words: 2010 - Pages: 9
  • Analysis and Historical Context from Second Treatise of Civil Government by John Locke

    COMMENTARY OF ‘SECOND TREATISE OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT’: The previous fragment we’ve read belongs to the work of John Locke, ‘Second Treatise of Civil Government’, who published it anonymously in 1689. It is a work of political philosophy, in which Locke talks about civil society, natural rights and separation of powers. Locke was one of the first empirical philosophers and he believed that the human being was born with no knowledge, and that experience and observation were the base of all human wisdom

    Words: 1157 - Pages: 5
  • Essay about The New Model Army and the Civil War

    The New Model Army and the Civil War In the early years of the civil war, little difference existed between parliament and the king in respects of power and territorial advantage. It could be said that the war was being fought to a desultory standstill. From the commencement of the conflict, the primary objective of Parliament had been simply to avoid defeat by the king. As soon as the problems of the government had resorted to violence, the leaders of Parliament knew that they could not tolerate

    Words: 1418 - Pages: 6