Locke Vs. Hobbes

Improved Essays
Locke and Hobbes are political philosophers, very important in the development of politics and a great influence for modern thought. The two make reference in their texts to the thought in which man exists without government "state of nature", and the risk of it. On the one hand, Locke talks about the benefits that are to come. He believes that men are by nature social animals. And when referring to the state of nature, he points out already existing examples. Meanwhile, Hobbes is quite more pessimistic. He doesn’t agree that men are not by nature social animals, and that the power of state is the key for society. When referring to the state of nature, he does it in a theoretical way.

In the state of nature, Locke thinks that men, even if they had defects, fulfilled their promises and obligations, and were mostly pleasant and peaceful beings.
…show more content…
Their theories differ when it comes to the extension of the state of war, the more negative Hobbes perspective on the natural state of man and his use of examples. Hobbes sees man as selfish while Locke has another completely different perspective. He thinks of man as someone with an innate morality. These visions are involved in the way of government that each philosopher recommends. Locke believes that the law is a means to comply with the dictates of nature. He believes that government is essential to maintain human nature and wants the state to limit itself to what is essential. While Hobbes believes that the state deserves protection and wants as much power as possible for his Leviathan. He considers the law as a means to fulfill contracts. Hobbes considers the government as a means to counter human nature. The beliefs of these two thinkers are irreconcilable, but they are aware that the form of government proposed in conclusion is pre-social. The present world has apparently adopted a more

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes beilved the goverment was to protect us from ourselves and Locke beilved it was to protect the natural rights. Hobbes beilved that the goverments power can not be limited and Locke beilved it…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The state of nature is viewed differently by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Hobbes views that state of nature and man in a negative light with everyone being only for themselves. Locke views the state of nature in…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 22: Enlightenment and Revolution Assessment –Research Worksheet Directions: Completion of this worksheet is a required part of your assessment for this unit. Please type into this document and email it to your teacher in the same email as the Facebook profile. Thomas Hobbes Where was he born? Thomas Hobbes was born in Westport, in 5th April 1588.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Leviathan of Hobbes proposes a system of supremacy that a supreme or invincible ruler controls. Meanwhile, Locke's Second Treatise of Government presents a government that is dependable or responsible to its people with restrictions on the supremacy or power of the sovereign. Furthermore, according to Hobbes, the "state of nature" is both extremely a cruel setting and oddly formed or structured. Hobbes recognizes that we have natural laws that exist, but he mostly talks about the "state of nature" as a place of total or absolute independence. However, what like Spiderman's uncle said, with great power comes great responsibility.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His similarities to Locke have much to do with the social contract theory, which he was also believed in. Despite this, the two theories differ fundamentally on why government has its place in society and how influential government can be. (p.15). Hobbes put a great emphasis on government, probably in part due to the era in which he lived. Hobbes did not quite live long enough to see the Enlightenment and the new ideals that shortly followed.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes had very opposite theories. Thomas Hobbes idea was very different from the natural law but John Locke’s idea was close and similar to the natural law. Locke’s theory was the efficiency of getting what the people want. John Locke might have followed the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and cooperated to a different theory but his theory is the better understanding of the nature of…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both the Hobbesian and Lockean account of the state of nature rests on the notion of inherent equality, where there is no ascribed status or class. Everyone is essentially free to act as they will. Another point of similarity between these two philosophers is that self-preservation is central to the state of nature. They both believe that we enter a social contract to create a political authority because of the fear of death. Another point of similarity between Hobbesian’s and Lockean’s is they base their system on necessity.…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In both Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government both describe “the state of nature”. However, for both authors the view point on the “natural instincts” humans possess differs in multiple ways. For Hobbes the state of nature deals with the savagery of Americans, lead to criminal activity and involves two natural passions while Locke’s state of nature involves a state of equality. Both Hobbes and Locke’s explanation of state of nature have aspects of natural law, both authors include ideas of natural law to keep order in the society. For Hobbes the passion of reason causes individuals to look for peace and they therefore develop natural law.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction ‘During and after the English Revolution (1642-88), different English thinkers reacted differently toward the revolution, based on their own life experience and philosophical outlook’. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke strongly argued distinct notions of political power. One absolute kinship, the other a democratic republic. In this essay it will firstly state and discuss the relation between state and sovereign according to Thomas Hobbes. In doing so Thomas Hobbes ideas will then be compared to John Locke’s.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main similarity being what the purpose of the government or political power is, whereas the main difference is how they view the state of nature. Hobbes views the state of nature as a state of war, whereas Locke views it still as a society, but one that lacks true executive powers. Both philosophers made great contributions to political philosophy, but each had their own failures which later political philosophers tried to fix: “The tradition of political theory that begins with Hobbes and Locke, and continues today with Rawls and Habermas and their innumerable followers, has a blind spot, to which several theorists drew attention in the 1990s. That blind spot is the question of nationhood and nationalism” (Alexander-Davey, p.458). Overall, Hobbes and Locke had their differences, but each added something new to the conversation of political philosophy and the state of…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand Hobbes Man is not nature of a social animal, society would not exist except by power of the state. Second, Knowledge of natural law in Locke Humans recognize what is right and wrong, and are equipped of realizing what is lawful and unlawful alright to determine clashes. Specifically, and in particular, they are equipped for differentiating between what is theirs and what belongs to another person. Unfortunately they don't generally act as per this knowledge. Otherwise, in Hobbes Our knowledge of the objective, genuine answers on such questions is so weak, so slight and flawed as to be generally useless in resolving practical disputes.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He for the most part disagrees with everything John Locke said. Locke says the state of nature for the most part is peaceful. Hobbes says the state of nature is actually a state of war. The only thing the two agree on is the need for a form government. For Hobbes In the state of nature there is no such thing as justice or injustice for that matter.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays