Han Empire Vs Roman Empire Essay

Improved Essays
The Roman and Han Empire’s
When we take a look back at all the great empires that ruled throughout history, seldom does someone go too long without making reference to either the Han Empire or the Roman Empire. Both of these empires shared a lot in common and both set a precedent for great leadership and imperial dominance throughout history. However, while these empires had a great deal of similarities, they were also separated by several outstanding differences. Although, with great distance in between the two Empire’s and the lack of communication to hear or learn about one another tactics, it is surprising to see how similar their methods became. Both Empire’s looked at land as a big dollar sign and a way to expand their Empire and strengthen
…show more content…
The Roman Empire, however, set up their colonies at militaristic outposts that were not intended for the citizens of the public, but rather soldiers of the army. Another difference, was the language used among these colonies to communicate. The Han, required Mandarin to be spoken by its citizens, while the Romans, tried to adopt a language system of Latin. Both the Han and Roman governments took an active role in economic activity to help control order of the Empire (Guojuan, 2008, p. 1). All of these tactics used help create an engaging, innovative society for the citizens of both Empires. Both Empires used there bureaucracy as means to colonize major cities, leading to dominance by their respected Empire throughout new territory. In conclusion, both the Han Empire and the Imperial Roman Empire share many similarities within their military and use of a bureaucracy style of governing. Despite being far away in distance and completely unrelated to one another, the two powerful empires used the same methods to gather respect and territory. Their similarities provided leaders with a blueprint on how to be successful as an emperor during that time period. All in all, both the Roman and Han Empires were extremely fascinating regions that garner respect from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Athens was a Democratic Republic whereas Han China was Imperial. The most famous ruler of the Han Dynasty was Wudi. He helped the economy greatly by building roads and canals. He also built storage bins for grains. The Han government was Legalistic but had many Confucius advisors because the official belief system was Confucianism.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China Dbq

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han China encouraged the innovation of technology, they understood its need in order to better the lives of its people, they used it in a variety of ways and felt it was a positive step towards progress. Rome felt that innovation and new technology was not necessary and treated it as something to be used in limited situations they found it was on unneeded addition to their society and with little respect. Based on the first three documents Han China's officials recognized the usefulness of technology and the ways that it could assess its citizens the official saw the correlation between tool quality and the type of labor used to produce whatever tool iron tools and one case Rome based on documents four, five and six all seem to paint the Roman…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China were two empires formed on different parts of Eurasia. Imperial Rome from 31 BCE to 476 CE included their citizens in their government by having consuls elected by patricians, who made up the senate, and assemblies dominated by plebeians. Patricians were the elite class while plebeians were the commoners. Although the citizens did participate in government Rome needed a more centralized form of government. Julius Caesar became the first dictator in Rome and centralized the military and politics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 200 BCE and 200 CE, the two leading empires in the world were China and Rome, due to their widespread and rapidly expanding territories. Both empires expanded significantly throughout the span of their empires. To control such vast areas, Rome and China implemented comparable practices, yet significantly different. The Chinese government was much more centralized and bureaucratic, when being compared to Rome. In governing such extensive territories, bureaucratic and legal considerations overthrew individual necessities.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rome and Han China were both very successful, conquest oriented empires. Also, they both had strong governments. Han China’s Wu Ti encouraged peace and Confucianism providing a common value system that unified the empire and made it that much stronger. Rome had a higher emphasis on its military. Rome also didn’t have the value system to cement the peoples of its empire together which is why it proved less durable.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Han China’s attitude toward technology was more favourable than the Romans; they had a rather organized and class-divided society, making the populous’ general attitude toward technology to be lower. This can be proven through the constant concern on the part of the Han dynasty over the less than stellar opinion on the part of the Romans. As a foreword, every document provided was written by a higher class citizen or government official, giving no insight into how the common people, lower classes, peasants, or slaves felt about technology. This does not give a nation or empire-wide opinion on manufacturing and laboring, as the upper class was not the majority.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the greatest empires in history. Both empires showed great military forces, strived in economic trade, and their territories covered vasts amounts of land, yet they both had an unfortunate collapse. Although the Roman and Han empires are similar politically and socially in that there was conflict between the statuses there were also differences. In both Imperial Rome and Han China there was a social unrest during the collapses of the empires.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Classical Athens they had a more self-governed government whereas for Han China the emperor controlled governed everything. In both empire infanticide was not seen bizarre in their societies. Also in both empires the women had roles that were very much alike and were viewed in a similar manner. These two empires had their differences but they weren't great differences that set them apart from each…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Han Dynasty

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Two thousand years ago, the world was ruled by Rome. The Empire spread from England to Africa and from Syria to Spain, about 25 percent of the population of the world was under Roman law. The Roman Empire was founded on on Roman law and classical learning. The Han Dynasty was founded as a bureaucracy and confucian beliefs. The Han Dynasty was the second imperial dynasty of China, it was preceded by the Qin dynasty.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rome, however, focused on their infrastructures' aesthetics and entertainment, yet disregarded laboring efforts. This was due to the fact that religion nor philosophy was integrated within Rome's societal configuration, unlike China. The Han and Roman Empire each implemented their own unique hierarchies, with the Han having filial piety, a virtue of Confucianism, forming the social classes, whilst Rome's was based on economical distinction of plebeians and patricians. These social classes imposed different technological attitudes in both China and Rome.…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China’s developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade. Both empires had many intellectual achievements but Han China had much more innovative achievements, as in improving things, while Gupta India was much more dynamic, meaning the Indians worked on theories and then proved them. Something the Gupta Empire and the Han Empire had in common was that the emperors of these empires both believed they were chosen from the gods to rule.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays