Being An Atheist Argument

Improved Essays
On Being an Atheist
The existence of God is an ongoing argument between the atheist and the Christian. While the atheist needs undeniable proof that there is in fact an intelligent being that is causally necessary for the existence of everything on earth, Christians argue that one hundred percent certainty may not be possible. Foreman offers four ways to approach this argument: the existence of God is the best explanation for certain effects in the world, we may need to offer more than one argument in order to make our case for God’s existence, it is possible that we are wrong and that a defeater could cause us to adjust our argument, and that we are arguing for the characteristics of the being of God and not necessarily the character God
…show more content…
For the atheist, acknowledging the possibility of a necessary being that is the ultimate cause for the universe would suggest that they do, in some respect, acknowledge God’s existence. The cosmological argument states that there must be a first cause for the existence of the universe and that everything in the universe is contingent on that first cause. For Christians, that first cause is God, the creator of the universe and everything in it. McCloskey suggests that the world just happened, the Big Bang possibly, but what caused the Big Bang? If the universe is contingent upon a necessary being and everything in the universe is contingent on that being, why do we have human beings, trees, animals and not something else? If there is no first cause, no necessary being to intervene, then how did humans evolve from slime on a rock into a human being? Further, McCloskey refers to this necessary being as malevolent and a “well intentioned muddler” in an attempt to sway us to agree with his argument. For McCloskey, interjecting the problem of evil into his argument should squash our belief in an all powerful and loving God. Surely the Christian God would not allow evil deeds or events to befall His beloved creation. Again, I feel this is another weak demonstration of the …show more content…
Evolution is the reason that McCloskey believes that there this no evidence of design or purpose. It is difficult to believe that the concept of evolution has negated the idea that everything, including the human being, was designed with a purpose and by an intelligent being. I wonder if McCloskey ever thought about why human beings have five fingers and five toes. Of course he would put forth the argument of evolution, genetics and the like, but if we evolved from ‘slime on a rock’ why don’t we have flippers? The Bible says that mankind is God’s most prized above all creation, created in His image. The process of birth is amazing to me, although I am confident that science can explain away the mystery of this process to satisfy the atheist view. However, can the atheist explain with complete certainty why cells divide at just the right time and the right number of times to create a human being or why the body might reject an embryo because of a certain defect? There surly has to be some kind of intervention by an intelligent designer. Therefore, I believe that the human being is an example of genuine indisputable design and purpose. There are no two human beings that are exactly alike in every aspect. We are all different in one way or another and if McCloskey’s argument were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God is the best explanation, but not necessarily the only explanation. The second important thing to remember is that yes, these arguments are defeasible, meaning that it is possible they could be wrong. However, atheists and McCloskey have yet to provide a defeater for our arguments. We as Christians could be wrong, but someone has yet to prove us 100 percent wrong. The cumulative case approach is the idea that not one argument is the ultimate argument for proof of God’s existence.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question being asked is does Samuel Clarkes cosmological argument succeed or fail? Through his reasoning, I believe that his argument succeeds. After some thorough consideration and advising I have found all of Clarks premises, which are the steps in his argument, valid and cannot be fully proven otherwise. Clarkes cosmological argument is as follows: (1) There exists either an unending chain solely of dependent beings or there also exists at least one independent being; (2)…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discusses the Problem of Evil for theism, as well as defences theists have come up with against the problem. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: I shall argue that there is a possibility that God could have made different types of evils…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    McCloskey tempts the theists to look for answers and reasoning in a different way with his statement. In response, Evan and Manis say that the thrust of the non-temporal argument is that present existence of contingent objects requires that there be a necessary being” (Evans & Manis, 2009). As mentioned McCloskey claims that everything requires a cause for its existence; therefore God requires a cause for his existence. Evans and Manis discuss it this way, the argument assumes that all contingent beings require a cause for their existence; however, God is not a contingent being; only a self-existent or necessary being can qualify for the title of “God.” (Evans & Manis, 2009).…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So positive that he confidently states: “No being who was perfect could have created a world in which there was avoidable suffering or in which his creatures would (and in fact could have been created so as not to) engage in morally evil acts, acts which very often result in injury to innocent persons.” After reading this I feel as if McCloskey is blaming the evil doing on God. We in fact know that no man is able to answer the question of why men innocent people. We however can entail that men make their own decisions. It is the ones that believe in God that repent on his mistake made, while being in an evil mind set.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another argument by McCloskey about the teleological argument is the lack of design examples are purpose cannot be found “…indisputable example of design and purpose are needed” (McCloskey, 64). However the argument to disapprove itself in the following statements made by the author. The article suggest the mere fact of evolution around the universe which would disregard a designer of the earth. However According to Evan “the evolutionary process, even if it is a mechanical process, is simply the means whereby God, the intelligent designer, realizes his purposes.” (Evan, 83)…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For decades now, the topic of God’s presence has been bantered consistently. There are numerous arguments that seek to explain life apart from God’s involvement. Such as, cosmological and teleological arguments. “In light of these, H.J McCloskey composed an article entitled "On Being an Atheist" in which he says these contentions are false and contends that without complete evidences, we should expel the possibility of God totally and his primary complaint to the possibility of God is the nearness of underhandedness in the world” His approach does not actually deny the existence of God , but allows him to live as if there is no God.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kenneth Miller Evolution

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the emergence of Darwinism’s book, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, several individuals speculated that evolution was the ultimate antagonist toward the fundamental belief of the origin of creation: God. However, Kenneth Miller, a cellular biologist, rejects the separation of the two concepts in his book, Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution, by arguing that accepting one belief does not imply refuting the other but instead that both can coincide to propel the reality behind human’s natural existence. Throughout Genesis chapter two and three, Miller’s belief that “we were given our unique imaginative powers not only to find God, but also to discover as much of His universe…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey And Abhorrence

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The greatest contention that McCloskey postures against mystical faith in God is the thing that has been termed the issue of malevolence. McCloskey says that if a flawless, all-effective and entirely great God exists, then He would not have made a world in which unavoidable enduring and abhorrence exist. This contention can be an extremely troublesome one to handle from a mystical perspective, yet there are various conceivable clarifications for how a flawless and all-capable God can permit detestable on the planet. As a matter of first importance, it is not important to acknowledge the thought that a decent and impeccable being can't permit abhorrent. Imagine a scenario where the presence of some underhandedness considers a more prominent…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This comes to the conclusion that if God is omnibenevolent then the natural possibility of evil…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does God Exist Essay

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the vast study of philosophy, a particular question has baffled even the most intelligent minds. This question is, “Does God exist?” Philosophers have considered the answer to this question for centuries, each coming up with their own argument and reasons behind their thinking. A platform of debate often used is Antony Flew’s parable of the two explorers, who find a garden so beautiful, that one of the explorers is positive that there must be a gardener tending to it, even if he can’t be detected in any way. The other explorer is not so easily convinced that a gardener exists at all.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays