Get A Knife, Get A Dog, But Get Rid Of Guns, By Molly Ivins

Improved Essays
Firearm debates have run rampant in the past few years, people are starting to feel safe in their place in society. Unknowingly devising their own downfall, allowing others to choose their gun rights without a say. In her op-ed piece, "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns" Molly Ivins argues that guns are not protected by the second amendment; and that you 're well within your means to defend yourself without them. I whole heartily disagree with Ivins ' views on guns, and believe guns are a fundamental right and necessity for today 's society.

I believe everyone has a right to their opinion, and if it 's supported by factual information can 't be denied. However, miss Ivins misleads us. Providing biased information in an attempt to
…show more content…
She uses common sense, crime, and accidental death as a valid reason to restrict and ban guns. You can 't deny these are good reasons to restrict gun rights to competent individuals. Ivins uses another leading statement that actually supports restitution as a better option over a ban on firearms. She states,”The comparison most often used is that of the automobile, another lethal object that is regularly used to wreak great carnage.” Like me I don 't think you 've ever killed anyone with your car. I think this easily supports that when a competent person uses something deadly with care there isn 't any unattended cause and effect …show more content…
You don 't know what fear is, tell you 've heard coyotes fighting with one of your pets. Seconds to decide their fates, if love is worth risking your life. Grabbing your shotgun, rifle, or handgun and stepping through the front door into darkness. Pulling the trigger, hoping the sound of discharging powder is enough to avoid conflict. Fearing you 're too late and your loving dog is dead and gone the meal to a hungry predator. Ivins say there is no more frontier, she is dead wrong. The frontier never disappeared. As humans in our own hubris; we forget to remember that we moved into this frontier and share it with bears, coyotes, and any number of hungry predators. Those that live in the cities, you think you 're safe, but the predators are still there. There aren 't bears or coyotes, there are even more deadly animals; there your fellow man. People who want to take from you, all you 've worked hard for, and they don 't carry knives they carry

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rachel Bortnik Dr. Ted Vaggalis PHIL 316: Ethics 8 December 2017 Society’s Rights and Happiness Concerning Guns In Jeff McMahan’s essay, Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough, he argues for a ban on societies gun ownership—except for police and military services are still allowed to handle a gun. The purpose of McMahan’s argument is to resolve the danger guns cause in societies environment and the issue of guns being in the wrong hands. McMahan focuses on both the anti-gun advocates and the gun advocates disagreement of why or why not guns needs to be banned. Many scenarios are presented from both points of views.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout American history, the topic of gun control has been an argument filled with controversy. There have been a number of traumatic events in the country that involved the use of guns; Because of this, many Americans have become weary to the thought of anyone being able to carry a gun. Over the years, there have been many different stances developed pertaining to this topic. Some believe the Second Amendment should be completely abolished, others believe there should be no restrictions on guns, whatsoever. There is also an opinion in the middle of these two stances; some think by combining the two opposite beliefs and collaborating their ideas, a fair resolution could be made.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rodger D. McGrath is a well-known supporter of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the right to keep and bear arms. He wrote the article “A God-Given Natural Right.” McGrath’s article covers former disarmament, rise in crime, and history of the Second Amendment. His article has convincing reasoning for his intended audience. His targeted patrons are those who fiercely support the right to bear arms, proudly own multiple guns, believe gun restrictions mean complete disarmament, and those whom fear total government takeover.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Middle Ground of Gun Control The topic of gun control has been one of the most controversial debates in American history. Since the Revolutionary War the right to bear arms has been a constitutional right enjoyed by millions. Although, due to the dramatic increase in the number of gun related incidents, the Second Amendment faces strong opposition that demands radical changes. From school shootings to domestic terrorism in our country, the citizens of America have questioned the government’s power to keep people safe.…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Right to Bear Arms The argument that “outlawing guns will leave only criminals with guns”, has been debated over and over throughout the years without a truly clear answer being reached. As tragedies such as school shootings in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and more recently Florida become more and more common place, gun control laws have become the focal point of national concern, and call for more gun control laws has gotten louder and louder. The Constitution grants American’s the right to bear arms, but over the years these rights have become infringed upon as new laws are passed in response to specific acts and the call for new safety measures. Guns rights are a constitutional privilege that should not be regulated for unnecessary reasons…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Outdated

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States is one of the only places in the world where citizens are freely allowed to possess firearms. As a result of this, guns have become a large part of both our history and our culture. In fact the United States is the only country in the world where guns are a big part of its culture (Cross 2). This has led some curious citizens to wonder why we are the only country who has such a rich culture with guns. Some of the anti-gun supporters believe the Second Amendment is outdated and should be removed altogether because of our secure border patrol, our strong nuclear defense system, and our local armed police (Cross 2).…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States is a nation where individual rights are guaranteed and practiced to some extent. For example, the amendments created by the United States government have raised questions and doubts in many individual’s minds where an answer is nowhere to be found. As stated in 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This has become a controversial issue all around the United States of America. Although some people may believe that guns should be banned, in reality the right to be armed should not be ceased because it provides protection and it reveals to the American Citizens that their rights are guaranteed.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control in America is a significant issue, with an average of 91 gun related deaths per day, it is a matter that can no longer be ignored. Being controversial in its nature, author Phoebe Maltz Bovy doesn 't hesitate to shed light on her opinion on the affair. In her article “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” Bovy is quick to state that all guns are bad regardless of their purpose or the respective owner, that they’re all nothing more than dangerous machines.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, opponents of gun control say that a strict restriction on guns is a violation of their Second Amendment ’s right. In order to find a conclusion to the debate, a balanced approach to gun…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "When the law disarms good guys, bad guys rejoice." ~Ted Nugent. What do you thing about gun control? Guns should not be ban or taken away they should have certain requirements. Guns are our personal rights and they are our Second Amendment.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays