This is a complicated question because I feel as though it can only be answered contextually. The archetypal female villain is an extremely complicated figure, with many representations in contemporary and classic film and literature. I do not think that it would be correct to say that we have moved beyond the witch, the bitch, and the femme fatale. I believe it would be more accurate to say that there has been significant work over the last several decades to reclaim and redefine them as villains. Not all of this work has been successful, and to some extent it has the potential to cause its own problems, but it is important that the effort is still being made. It is my opinion that the discussion of the work being done to redefine female
…show more content…
While her form has changed since her early days of film noir, women who qualify for the title continue to fulfill many of the same powerful and dangerous roles in films. While it was not a part of the course material, one film that I watched in order to make some comparisons between classic era film noir and contemporary films was To Die For, starring Nicole Kidman. In both The Maltese Falcon and To Die For the power of the female body is located, quite literally, in her body. Sex and sexuality are used by the femme fatale figure to manipulate the behaviour of the people around her, particularly male characters. The extent to which the femme fatale archetype has transformed is significant, but few things have changed about her role as a villain. Female sexuality is inherently linked to danger in the femme fatale 's narrative. It may also be perceived as continuing to perpetuate stereotypes about manipulative women and the damage female power can have on everyone around her. There has been some work to alter the presentation of this figure in film and literature, but little seems to have changed. As Grossman discusses in her essay, the figure of the femme fatale is mostly a socially constructed phenomenon, but this does not change the fact that her body is her weapon. Stacy Gillis writes, in her article “The (Post) Feminist Politics of Cyberpunk,” that
While her form has changed since her early days of film noir, women who qualify for the title continue to fulfill many of the same powerful and dangerous roles in films. While it was not a part of the course material, one film that I watched in order to make some comparisons between classic era film noir and contemporary films was To Die For, starring Nicole Kidman. In both The Maltese Falcon and To Die For the power of the female body is located, quite literally, in her body. Sex and sexuality are used by the femme fatale figure to manipulate the behaviour of the people around her, particularly male characters. The extent to which the femme fatale archetype has transformed is significant, but few things have changed about her role as a villain. Female sexuality is inherently linked to danger in the femme fatale 's narrative. It may also be perceived as continuing to perpetuate stereotypes about manipulative women and the damage female power can have on everyone around her. There has been some work to alter the presentation of this figure in film and literature, but little seems to have changed. As Grossman discusses in her essay, the figure of the femme fatale is mostly a socially constructed phenomenon, but this does not change the fact that her body is her weapon. Stacy Gillis writes, in her article “The (Post) Feminist Politics of Cyberpunk,” that