Extended Republic

Superior Essays
The Feasibility of an Extended Republic in America Governments are only as effective as their structure allows them to be. A government that is large and unwieldy will rarely be efficient due to the red tape and bureaucracy bogging it down. The power structure in a monarchy differs from the structure in a republic. When deciding the shape of the American government, the Founding Fathers carefully considered all shapes and sizes of government to try and find what would suit the new nation the best in the wake of the Articles of Confederation. Their decision to establish an extended republic was a revolutionary idea that attracted much criticism and attention because it was an untested idea. The feasibility of an extended republic is tested …show more content…
All attempts at establishing a republic in the ancient times had been in small states like Sparta, which lasted for about five hundred years. Sparta is an example used often in the debate over the virtues of an extended republic. The rules established by Lycurgus in an effort to unite the city-state into a republican nation were harsh but effective. The reason they were so effective was because the state was small enough for the laws to be enforced and the will of the people to be influenced by the leaders. Commerce was banned and inhabitants were banned from traveling abroad due to fear of contamination by outside influences (Plutarch 8). The homogeneity that emerged from the enforcement of these harsh rules is a characteristic found in many republics because, in the eyes of many Anti-Federalists and philosophers, it was the only way to ensure that everyone in the republic was willing to work for the common good. In the eyes of Brutus and other Anti-Federalists, there should be similar manners and sentiments, otherwise the principles of the people will constantly clash (Brutus 6). The diversity of those who live in America today is celebrated as an innate part of the country’s heritage, but in the time of the Federalists, there was a push towards similarity and homogeneity in the population. Though the interests would vary from state to state, all Americans believed in certain ideals that brought …show more content…
The election of these representatives would take place in their own districts, and they would be held responsible for properly conveying the concerns of their constituents to the larger body. Though this seems fair and equal, there was the fear that the citizens would not really know their leaders well enough. In such a large nation, there would be very few people who were recognized by the entire nation, and the Anti-Federalists were afraid that it would be these same people who ended up getting elected each time to lead the people. This would create a “natural aristocracy” where those elected would be truly unlike those who were voting for them (Storing 17). While it is true that the first few leaders tended to be those who were prominent for their role in shaping the country, it was a largely unfounded fear. The representatives, who were elected in their own districts, were also held responsible for their actions. Their limited tenure meant that it was unlikely that they would disobey the will of the people, allowing that part of government to remain under the consent of the governed. This did not pacify the Anti-Federalists, as they believed that rotating the legislators made it easier to pass the blame to the predecessor, making it difficult for the people to recognize whose incompetency led to the mistake. Now, this is no longer

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this short essay, I will briefly discuss Elitism and how the Federalist argument for a stronger central government uses the idea of pluralism. The way I view the Constitutional Convention and the debate over the ratification of the constitution in 1787 is a struggle between two points of view. On one side you have the Federalists and on the other Anti-federalists. Leading the Federalist enterprise was Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay who wrote eighty-five essays that were to convince the people of New York to vote for the newly written Constitution. The new…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that one government could express the opinions or understand the will of the people could not be exercised by a government so large. This argument was an attempt to keep governmental control at the state level, where the people were closest to those that represented them. Additionally, Antifederalist’s believed a United States of its current size managed from one central government to be improbable and with the growth potential of the young nation, adequate representation would be nearly impossible without unmanageable numbers of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of America’s history, the ideas of of a perfect society filled with stability has been the main focus of our country 's government system. The ideas of power have a significant influence on the way our country has developed. The constitution was a document created in order to spread power and to establish equality between all individuals. Within the preamble of the constitution contains the set goals of what our country was intended to achieve by our Founding Fathers. During the 19th century the United States as a whole had attempted, but ultimately did not achieve its goals of promoting general welfare, establishing Justice and securing the blessing of liberty.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Brutus’ first article he addresses the citizens of New York State with caution as he exposes the flaws of the United States government after their liberation from British rule. He draws attention to the importance of his fellow citizens’ stance on the adaptation of the Constitution. Brutus states that “the most important question that was ever proposed to your decision, or to the decision of any people under heaven, is before you, and you are to decide upon it by men of your own election, chosen specially for this purpose.” (Brutus, 1787) With regards to the importance of representatives, creating a government with an unequal amount of representatives is proposed to be a problem.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, under the Articles of Confederation, the leaders wanted a government based on popular sovereignty, which was by the people-for the people. Because these leaders had just come out of such tight control under the rule of Great Britain, the states didn’t want to give the government too much power. This gave the majority of the power to the states. However, the political leaders soon realized that individual state governments weren’t working and decided to change the rule of the government once more. Now the country shifted to a strong central government with a bicameral legislature of a congress with the Senate and the House of Representatives.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Americans were creating their new government, they kept the features of the government they did not want in mind. They wanted to ensure that their government was very different from the monarchy that Britain had by trying to make a central government where its powers were not necessarily weak, but where the power rested in the people. Another feature that the Americans did not want in their new government was unequal representation. They despised the lack of representation they had in Parliament, and as they created their new government they ensured that every state was represented equally so the concerns of the people could be properly addressed. Because of this, the American public was adamant that the new government’s powers were…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1776 the Second Continental Congress began to draft the plans for the government of the new nation that would be formed after the colonies gained their independance. The plan that the congress created is called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation created a confederal form of government, consisting of a loose union of 13 states, each with their own governments. However, despite the founder’s good intentions the government formed under the Articles of confederation is considered a failure, because it had minimal powers, did not have a chief executive or national court, and could not effectively raise funds for the national treasury. The biggest fear of the delegates at the Second Continental Congress was government overreach, and tyranny.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Government Structure

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ancient Roman government structure is something that was unique to civilizations at this time. The Romans were trying to be different and better than the civilizations that had come before them. The book Rome, the Greek World, and the East: Government, Society, and Culture in the Roman Empire examines the differences between the Romans to the other successful civilizations that had come before them. This provides a good insight into why the Roman model was considered special and unique from the rest of the world. It also theorizes on what the Romans wished to embody as they structured their empire.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the revolutionary war, America was struggling with finding an effective Government that does not include a tyrant for a leader. For the first few year of freedom, America followed the Articles of Confederation. This did not work because although they didn’t have a tyrant for a leader, “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes.” (How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?). In 1787, when the Constitution was created, it was agreed that the Constitution should be able to make an efficient government free of tyranny.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Paper 1 This paper will answer the question of What are the ends or purposes of American government? How are they different from other regimes, such as ancient Sparta or Puritan colonies? How do the ends of regimes alter the role of government in society?…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays