Why Do We Have The Death Penalty?

Improved Essays
Is killing people human? Is taking the life of another an acceptable thing in society? That’s how people go to the chair and sit there to rot correct? Then why do we still have the death penalty in the United States? For years the country has been in a heated debate on whether the death penalty is really a valid form of punishment. Problem with the death penalty being an option of punishment is in fact, that most people sent to death sit there for years on end. Moreover, the argument of financial is coming into question. The action of actually executing an inmate is costly. Finally, there is the debate on the innocent being killed but also the thoughts that other countries have on our methods of punishment. The death penalty can be traced to the beginnings of when the United States was first created. Over the years many forms of execution have been deemed immoral and taken away. From firing squad to lethal injection, the evolution of execution methods has been driven by the “desire to bring about the most efficient and humane way of carrying out executions.” (“Methods of Execution”, 2008). This in return has led to new inventions and creations to kill felons. According to How …show more content…
Before 2005 any juvenile under the age of 18 could be sent to death row but according to “Facts about the Death Penalty” in 2005 the possibility of the death penalty for juveniles was struck down with Roper v. Simmons. Another recent debate on the death penalty has been cost effectiveness. On average holding an inmate in prison cost significantly less than that of using lethal injection to kill them. But if we give the inmates life without parole we face the issue of aging in prison. This is becoming an increasing problem with the years. Those aging in prison from the 80’s are not having multiple surgeries to correct injuries sustained in prison, or those associated with aging

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case of Atkins v. Virginia involved an 18-year old named Daryl Atkins. After a day of drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana with a friend, the two walked to a convenience store where they abducted an airman from Langley Air Force Base (Paust, 1998). The two men forced themselves into his pickup truck and drove him to an ATM teller where he was forced to withdraw money at gunpoint (Paust, 1998). Atkins and his accomplish then drove the airman to a remote area and shot him eight times. Atkins pleaded guilty to abduction and robbery of the young airman but pleaded not guilty to the murder (Paust, 1998).…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death penalty on juveniles Capital punishment has continued to elicit raging debates over the years. Inferring from the Furman v. Georgia (1972), Gregg v. Georgia (1976) and the resumption of death penalty as the retribution, the issue of innocence continues to haunt and cause contentious public debates in the United States (Foley, 2004). With regards to this, consignment of juvenile offenders to the gallows have consistently been disputed as a disproportionate punishment to minors; those below the age of 18, and thus it contradicts the evolving standards of decency, which characterizes the progress of a maturing society (Foley, 2004). In Roper v Simmons (2005), the Supreme Court consented that consigning a minor to a death penalty is unconstitutional…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment has been around for hundreds of years and was brought to America by the Europeans in the early 1600s; The first recorded death being back in 1608. Back in that time the Death Penalty was used in many cases from thievery to murder, making it the social norm during that time. Though in today’s society, capital punishment has been deemed by some as inhumane or morally wrong. In some ways it’s become a political issue in which a higher percentage of Republicans favor the death penalty more so than Democrats.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that life without parole for juveniles convicted of crimes other than homicide violated the Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, a ruling that extended the court's logic in its 2005 decision to abolish the juvenile death penalty” (Steinberg,2012). When juveniles are put in the same prison as adults they’re most likely to learn bad habits and reoffend. Therefore, juveniles should not should not get life in…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate between Judges and juries awarding the death penalty or life in prison to juvenile offenders has been ongoing for many years. The decision to execute a convicted juvenile felon (age varies depending on state) that has been found guilty of a capital offense, or to incarcerate that person for life continues to be a topic that is discussed and debated in state legislatures and the Supreme Court every year. This article will explore the comparisons of the cost to keep a convicted felon incarcerated for life, or to execute them. Additionally, it will explore the possibility of being able to rehabilitate young offenders given the sentence of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP), or locking them away for the rest of their natural…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many hard- liners insist that if someone is old enough to murder, he is old enough to die or to serve an adult-length sentence. This approach may alleviate the fears of some; nonetheless, facts indicate that this approach is not in the true public interest. True, intelligent, research-based justice demands that juvenile murderers, even those who are sixteen, should be tried as juveniles in juvenile courts. The foremost reason for trying teenagers only in juvenile courts is that their capabilities…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty in the United States has been a controversial issue for a very long time. The first time anyone ever opposed to the death penalty was in Colonial America. This was not too long after the first execution in the 1700’s. Over time, many countries have abolished the death penalty, but the United States is one of the few countries that still defends and supports the continued use. However, there is evidence that the attitudes about the death penalty is changing.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crime is a tremendous issue in the United States, but it becomes controversial when the age of offenders drops at a massive rate over the years. The United States has tried Juvenile offenders as adults for committing heinous crimes. However, citizens all over the country have argued that juveniles are too young for such punishments. The United States has developed the juvenile court system to trial minors, under the age of eighteen, differently from those in adult prison. However, the crime rate for juveniles has become massive, and in a large degree.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been used for thousands of years, dating all the way back to Hammurabi’s Code in the 1700s BC, which is most known for its famous line, “an eye for an eye”. It is still in use today, and is the subject of much controversy for a few main reasons. One, some people question the ethics of killing someone. Two, it costs an average of $90,000 more per year per prisoner to keep a prisoner on death row as opposed to a normal jail, according to Rone Tempest, award-winning author of the Goldsmith Prize for Investigative Reporting, in Death Penalty Focus: The High Cost of the Death Penalty. This money comes from taxpayers, which is the main reason that the cost of the death penalty causes so much controversy.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As of 2006, at least 2,225 people in the United States were serving sentences of life without parole for crimes they committed before their eighteenth birthday” (Massey, 2006, p.1) Now, 38 of the 50 states allow juvenile killers to be sentence to life without parole. In a number of states, the punishment is mandatory, the defendant’s age and background cannot be considered when determining the sentence. Sentencing juveniles to life in prison violates the Constitution’s that says it is cruel and unusual punishment . This controversial issues regarding life without parole for juveniles are on 2 stages (1) questions of retribution vs. rehabilitation for juvenile offenders and 2) the legal issues surrounding life without parole for juveniles, the people who work for the Juvenile justice advocates believe that teenagers and children have not develop emotionally and mentally as adults. Since they are so young these teens might not grasp the consequences of a crime and how the rest of they life will be affected.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Definitions

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Presenting: Wednesday, Dec. 7 The United States federal government (in comparison to the separate states) applies the death penalty for crimes: treason, terrorism, espionage, federal murder, large-scale drug trafficking, and attempting to kill a witness, juror, or court officer in certain cases. Definitions Treason- the crime of betraying one 's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government. Terrorism- the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays