Teleological Vs Deontological Analysis

Improved Essays
The main focus of this paper is to better understand the ethical system. Ethical system is defined as beliefs of being right or wrong; it can be from religious values or even personal experiences. The topics I will focus on is deontological, then talk a little about the differences between deontological and teleological. Based on the ethical system we have discussed in class, the one that fits me best would be egoism. It fits me best because self-interest is definitely something that describes me, that 's something people say about me when they first meet me. I also think another way to put this ethical system would be pursuit of your own interests. It describes me because I do what it takes to make me feel better about myself. Then I will …show more content…
For example like myself, deontological would fit me, because if I am going to help a person in need, I’m going to do it because I want to, not because I’m expecting something in return. Deontological ethic is good because of some characteristics of the action itself, not because the action is good. I mentioned before Deontological focuses on right and wrong, but then we question. Some people don’t see when they are right or wrong, sometimes a person can be right and think they are wrong or vice versa they can be wrong and they are right. So would that still be considered deontological? Right takes priority over good. Some may argue that the action is wrong no matter what may happen to them. For example, lying is always wrong. Now the difference between teleological and deontological ethics, teleological ethic is the basic standard of morality is precisely the value of what an action brings into being and deontological is the principle lies in the conformity of and action to some law. The connection of individuals in a specific spot with each other makes a society. In a society where people cooperate with each other there has a …show more content…
It never changed up until now. As I grew up I realized I can’t live life thinking only about myself. So actually I turned against being egoism, and I think it has made me a better person. The story behind it is one day we had a family gathering at my house, friends and family. My oldest sister came home from out of town happy to see everyone and she had gifts for all my sisters except for me. So as I look around and see everyone opening gifts, I start to get really sad because she didn’t get me anything. I stormed away sad and hurt. And at the time I wasn’t thinking that, that’s exactly how I do people and now that it done to me I don’t like it. Later, my sister came after me and said, “ now you see how it feels to be left out you do this to us every time, you are always only thinking about yourself (self interest). Right there is when I realized I can’t be like this I have to change. That’s when ethic of care comes in, I had to make a change and start to care for others and not just myself. These conflicts are moral issues and the result of the arrangements will influence the lives of the people included. A few clashes will influence a man 's life more than different clashes, however all arrangements require thinking behind the decisions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1c) Deontologists trust that morality involves obligation. We have moral obligations to do things which it is on the whole correct to do and moral obligations not to get things done which it isn't right to do. In the case of something is correct or wrong doesn't depend on its outcomes. Or maybe, an activity is correct or wrong in itself.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Ethics is defined as the set of moral principles or values that defines right and wrong for a person or group. Immediately, the guides are all given the responsibility of holding peoples lives. The expedition is dangerous and in order to be successful everyone must work together. However, the trip is costly and it is easy to make the decision to take peoples money without guaranteeing them safety. An example of a positive ethical decision occurred when Krakauer let the twenty climbers pass before he declined.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A fundamental concept not only to free-markets but to much of human interaction is that of self-interest; or, as Adam Smith refers to it in his work "The Theory of Moral Sentiments" (1759): "self-love". Selfishness is also an important concept that must be differentiated and expressed in terms so as to not confuse the two as if they are purely derived from and interchangeable to one another. Accordingly, it is the goal of this article to differentiate the concepts of self-interest and selfishness: to praise the concept of self-interest as the moral drive for approbation and admiration, and to admonish selfishness as the motivator of immorality and hedonism.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will defend psychological egoism as the most probable explanation for moral choice and motivation. I hold psychological egoism to be “the view that all men are selfish in everything that they do, that is, that the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self-interest” (Rachels 233). Since every action is moved by a desire to be satisfied, even in supposedly altruistic acts, one acts on a desire to satisfy one’s desire, so that supposedly altruistic acts are not actually altruistic. James Rachels, to whom my defining of psychological egoism is attributed, counters psychological egoism as incorrect moral skepticism. In the form of a Platonic dialogue, I will present, if successful, the impossibility for any ‘moral’ conduct beyond psychological egoism, counteracting Rachels own refutation in his essay, “Egoism and Moral Scepticism.”…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical egoism is a moral theory focused on improving a person’s well-being. There are many arguments for ethical egoism such as the self reliance argument and the best argument for ethical egoism, both presented by Shafer-Landau in The Fundamentals of Ethics. However, in this paper I will discuss how objections presented by Shafer-Landau and Dr. Thomas Carson are fatal to ethical egoism, while keeping in mind arguments for ethical egoism. I will discuss objections such as ethical egoism permitting or sometimes requiring murder, theft, or rape, in order to promote oneself’s well-being, egoists subconscious belief of their lives being more important than others, and an argument presented in class that if egoists must do what is best for their…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical egoism is the idea that people have moral obligations only to themselves and that they ought to pursue their own ends exclusively. An ethical egoist would say that one has no duty to help others in need unless doing so happens to coincide with one's own needs. Because ethical egoism prescribes actions, it is distinct from psychological egoism (discussed in the previous selection by Joel Feinberg), which is a descriptive claim about the nature of people's motivations. Rachels provides several arguments both for and against ethical egoism. The first argument for ethical egoism is that we actually harm other people by looking out for their interests.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “With the weight of this responsibility in mind, it’s important to define and understand the two basic ethical systems. We use these to process everything from simple, everyday challenges all the way up to those “rock and a hard spot,” potentially career-ending predicaments (Bayley, 2010, p. 1).” The Deontological Ethical System and the Teleological Ethical System. The Deontological Ethical system…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that people who should be considered to be altruistic are those who act magnanimously to those outside of their family or general social group. I will use examples such as kin selection, animal altruism, and arguments against psychological egoism to assist in proving my thesis to be true. I will also address a counter argument made by some psychological egoists who believe that due to most people feeling pleasure while doing good things for others, that there are no people only act selfishly. I will reference James Rachel ’s essay “Psychological Egoism” to help enhance my theory that not all acts must be out of self interest.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Explanations of Morals (Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held) Morals (mor – als) Noun; plural 1. a lesson, especially one concerning what is right or prudent, that can be derived from a story, a piece of information or an experience. 2.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Korsgaard On Self-Interest

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do we have non-self-interested reasons to act morally? Introduction This paper seeks to deliberate on the debate on whether there are non-self-interest reasons to act morally. The paper reviews two pivotal arguments from two great philosophers with opposing views.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I prefer virtue ethics for the reason that virtue ethics seems to promote rather than neglect the development of the agent’s character. Though deontology…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). We have learned throughout this class that ethics is a moral value that differs from person to person but what makes up ethics? Ethical theories are a huge part of ethics; however, many of the theories differ in more than one way. In this essay two theories will be focused on and outlined, those theories being, ethical egoism and Kant’s theory of good will. In the outline regarding these theories I will cover the strengths of both theories, what type of dilemmas the theories can cover and lastly there will be some criticism…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These theories can be used to evaluate everyday incidents at workplace to see if those incidents were ethical or not. It can also be said that both teleological theory and deontological thoery ethics use a dilemma approach because they focus on one specific decision-making context at one point in time for one individual. The dilemma approach is useful in the real world but it does have limitations, such as, people and the societies have a past; and many actions can be changed and a person can choose to move their life in a different direction-few choices are binding for life. Additionally, Teleology and deontology appear to be opposites because one theory only considers consequences and the other appears to ignore consequences. The four groups of teleological theory include ethical egoism, ethical elitism, ethical parochialism and ethical…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays