Sub-Saharan Africa was characterized as the great global area of female farming systems in which women, using traditional hoe technology, assumed a substantial responsibility for food production. Moreover, Boserup posited a positive correlation between the role women played in agricultural production and their status vis-a-vis men. Boserup’s critique of colonial and post-colonial agricultural policies was that through their productivity-enhancing interventions and dominant Western notions about what constituted appropriate female tasks, they had facilitated men’s monopoly over new technologies and cash crops and undermined women’s traditional roles in agriculture, thereby heralding the demise of the female farming systems. This, according to Boserup, was creating a dichotomy in the African countryside where men were associated with the modern, cash-cropping sector and women with traditional, subsistence agriculture. Relegated to the subsistence sector, women lost income, status and power relative to men. More importantly, their essential contribution to agricultural production became invisible. By arguing that in the recent past women were not only equal in status to men, but also equally productive, Boserup challenged the conventional wisdom that women were less productive and therefore unentitled to a share of scarce development resources. Woman are …show more content…
WID merely attempts to make an economic argument for improving women’s absolute economic condition through specifically targeted development programs, but it ignores the larger issue, which is women’s relative status to men. It is in this sense that Gender and Development is a superior theory for analyzing the cycle of poverty and underdevelopment that many women in the third world seem to be stuck