Theme Of Language In Animal Farm

Decent Essays
Animal Farm also explores the way that language can be used as a tool of control. Squealer’s character, which represents the media or propaganda arm of a corrupt government, is wonderfully developed as the story progresses. Squealer’s cover stories grow more and more audacious with each event he lies about. The pigs gradually and over time in the story twist the their principles to both keep the other animals ignorant and to justify their behavior. In the beginning, the pigs distort the meaning of Old Major’s words so that the other animals cannot oppose the pigs without being against the ideals of the Rebellion. By the end of the story, Squealer has repeatedly altered the Seven Commandments in order to legitimize the pig’s betrayals and …show more content…
Whenever the animals question one of Napoleon’s actions, no matter how selfish it seems, Squealer succeeds in convincing the animals that Napoleon is only acting in their best interests. Throughout the book, Squealer pulls off what would today be a terrific public-relations stunt by picturing the pigs as near-martyrs who never think of themselves but the other animals. His speech and abuse of language makes the animals think that the pigs are really selfless, not selfish. Squealer uses a rhetorical question over and over again in the book – “Surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones back?” This move causes the pigs to look on their current situation, no matter how bad it may be, and reason that they are better off than they ever were under Mr. Jones’ …show more content…
By slightly altering some of the the Seven Commandments, Squealer actually re-writes history, and explains it away so skillfully that it is the animals who believe that they are the ones who forgot what the original commandments said. When he needs to convince the animals that the windmill was actually Napoleon’s idea, which of course it wasn’t, he introduces a new and confusing term, “tactics”. When the pigs reduce the amount of the animal’s food, Squealer searches and finds a suitable word to replace “reduction” to make the action not look so bad. Instead of honestly saying that the food had been reduced, Squealer cleverly uses the word “readjustment”, which means just a small change to something. In addition, the use of the word readjustment give the animals the feeling that the pigs are looking out for them and carefully watching how much food is available for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Squealer serves as an informant for the other animals, and since he is an animal, the population of the farm put blind faith in him to tell the truth. However, he serves to do the opposite, in an effort to hide the pigs’ corruption. For example, when the pigs first start to exploit the system, Squealer justifies their actions by telling the animals, “[i]t is for your sake that we drink that milk and eat those apples” (Orwell 32). Realistically, the pigs only want the extra food, however Squealer spins the story to seem like it is benefitting all animals and the others have no choice but to believe him because of their blinding trust in the system and the pigs. He also attacks the other animals and suggests their memory is failing them when they oppose the pigs.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Napoleon’s right hand man, Squealer enforces the idea that Napoleon’s power is above all and no other thoughts or ideas will be accepted. Squealer uses his manipulative language to trick the animals into believing Napoleon’s objectives. Squealer takes advantage of the sheep to help support Napoleon’s case. “The sheep spent the whole day [at the waste ground] browsing at the leaves under Squealer’s supervision…[Squealer] was, he said, teaching them to sing a new song, fro which privacy is needed” (88). He uses the sheep that cannot think for themselves to make Napoleon’s new changes seem more acceptable as they seem like they are already supporting it.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 3, the pigs start to take all the milk and apples. Some animals complain, but once again, Squealer comes in and tells them lies to calm them. “‘Comrades!’ he cried. ‘You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege?…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    over your welfare. Do you know what would happen if we pigs failed in our duty?” (Orwell 23). Not only does Squealer use pathos, he also poses a rhetorical question. Squealer is a cunning and eloquent speaker who can sway the other animals in his desired direction by using mastery of language and rhetoric.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Squealer says this to threaten the animals in a way of making them think Napoleon abusing them counteracts Jones from coming back. Although Squealer is saying this, he is speaking on behalf of Napoleon. The…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whenever the pigs or dogs break a commandment, Napoleon has Squealer the pig slightly change one of the commandments written on the end of the barn. For example, when the pigs start to drink alcohol, the fifth commandment that originally stated that “No animal shall drink alcohol” (George Orwell, 25) is changed so that it states “No animal shall drink alcohol to excess” (George Orwell, 109). In this instance and many others, Napoleon uses the other animals bad memory and the pig's ability to write to change the law so that the pigs never break it, even though they actually do. The worst part is that at the end of the book, all the commandments are erased and replaced with the sentence “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” (George Orwell, 134). This means that Napoleon got rid of all the laws and made it so that the other animals cannot question his actions with factual evidence that he did anything wrong.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Old Major's Propaganda

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Old Major is one of the characters who play their roles as masters possessing great rhetorical skills. Old Major narrates: “‘Now, comrades, what is the nature of this life of ours? Let us face it: our live are miserable, laborious, and short’… All men are enemies. All animals are comrades.”…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the animals drive out Mr. Jones, the cruel owner of the farm, the pigs use his absence to their own advantage. When the pigs create new laws and terms of the farm, they suggest that Mr. Jones will return if the animals do not follow their orders, knowing that all would do anything to prevent it (Orwell 56). The pigs use this excuse throughout the book to get what they want without being questioned. They play on the animals’ fear and ignorance of a time they all can only vaguely remember. Later in the book, all of the animals gather for a meeting and watch as several huge dogs target four pigs that recently had spoken out against Napoleon.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This large excerpt of the novel is full of dishonesty and persuasiveness, since Orwell creates Squealer as a very persuasive, aware character, as he knows exactly what he is doing, and what will be the outcome from his actions. Squealer states that the pigs are not indulging out of selfishness and privilege (which they are), he himself dislikes milk and apples, and gives examples that are supposedly backed up by scientific evidence regarding why the pigs need the nutrition supplied by milk and apples. By doing so, Squealer is providing falsehoods for persuasion out of the pigs’ selfishness to convince the animals that by giving up what is rightfully theirs, they are doing the right thing for the development of the farm. To conclude his statement,…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin the pigs broke the commandment “Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy" and through Squealer powerful speech he justifies the pig's action to the other animals. “Napoleon announced that he had decided upon a new policy. From now onwards Animal Farm would engage in trade with neighboring farms: not of course, for any commercial purpose but simply in order to obtain certain materials which were urgently necessary." (Orwell 42). {Evidence…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And as the pigs rose in power, there was less and less the common animals could do. When Squealer insisted it was Napoleon, not Snowball, who wanted to build a windmill, the animals had no choice but to do or say nothing. The “truth” that Squealer manufactured was the truth the animals must accept. If he said that Napoleon was using tactics, Napoleon was using tactics. “The animals were not certain what the word meant, but Squealer spoke so persuasively, and the three dogs who happened to be with him growled so threateningly, that they accepted his explanation without further questions” (Orwell 58).…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adlai E. Stevenson once said “... the truth is often unpopular…” In other words, the truth is often either untold or bent. In this quote, Stevenson is trying to convey that telling the truth is not always the choice that people choose to make. They always try to bend the truth for themselves so that their sense of dignity and pride would not fade away. It shows that being dishonest is more likely to occur than being truthful.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This job relies largely on Squealer, who is able to twist anything he says so that the pigs, and primarily Napoleon, are always in the right. The pigs rewrite history by stretching the truth so that the animals, unaware of what is actually happening, end up believing what's being said by Squealer and the pigs. An example of this is when the Pigs moved into the house and while it might appear that they are violating a tenet of Animalism, Squealer argues that it is a must for the Pigs to have space to work in and plan for the farm's benefit. This is only an example of rewriting history, or Animalism, in order to benefit the pigs whilst the other animals fail to either realize nor act on what is being done. In Chapter 7, Squealer rewrites history by framing Snowball as an agent of Jones, and resulting in letting anyone who agreed with him as an enemy of the farm.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Orwell’s Animal Farm first published in England on the 17th of August 1945. It reflects the events leading up to the Russian revolution of 1917 and the Stalinist era of the Soviet Union. Orwell created a figure who represented the Russian peasants and common working class, known as Boxer. The working class had been betrayed by the Stalinists, similar to Boxer who had also been betrayed by the other animals on the farm.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Squealer Speech Analysis The book Animal Farm is an allegory novel written by George Orwell on August 17th, 1945. The book depicts the events leading up to the Russian Revolution and the era of the Stalinist Soviet Union. The characters in this novel try to form a sustainable democracy/society in which animals can live a peaceful life without the threat of human beings. The main leaders who take action in this book are Napoleon and Snowball who are both pigs.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays