Marx Wage Labour Analysis

Superior Essays
Show More
What is Marx’s concept of ‘Wage Labour’ and the relationship of the worker to the capitalist, as he describes it in ‘Wage Labour and Capital’?

I believe that Marx’s concept on ‘Wage Labour’ is the amount of value received in the work that was carried out. The wage that is given to the worker is the amount of money that is paid by the capitalist who is the boss, who then gives that money to the labourers which are the workers. Marx explains the key concepts of a ‘Wage’ and he also compares the difference between the labourer and a capitalist. Marx also questions the realistic activity, by informing us about the power of current working class, and also the capitalist and the possessor. There are various stages that are put in place for …show more content…
Wages are what the individual worker is paid for his or hers labour power. It is the capitalist’s money that is given to the labourer for the amount of work they carry out. Wage labour is known as the mode of production that the labourer can then sell their capacity to work as a functional commodity. Wage labour can be seen as a class of people that have no other means of living, and another class of individuals who own their own means of production that can be known as their own private property. The capitalist who goes on to buy labour power and pays for its value then go on to own that specific labour process. “Wages are the sum of money paid by the capitalist for a particular labour time or for a particular output of labour” (Marx, 1847). Marx portrays a labourer and a capitalist as two completely different people and rightfully so as a labourer is the person that puts in all the hard work and time to manufacture the specific products for the capitalist who is the one that sits back and receives all the money from the products that have been manufactured by his or hers labourers. The capitalist buys their own labour with their money. They then go on to sell their labour. What they actually are doing is selling to the capitalist for a certain amount of money, which then turns into their own labour power. A labourer as …show more content…
and Molyneux, J. (2017). Karl Marx; Wage Labour and Capital. [online] Socialist Worker | Ireland. Available at: http://www.socialistworkeronline.net/karl-marx-wage-labour-and-capital/ [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017].

Harris, L. Abram (2017). “Race, Radicalism, and Reform: Selected Papers”.

Karl Marx, ‘Wage Labour and Capital’ (extract) in Robert C. Tucker (ed.) The MarxEngels Reader (W. W. Norton & Company, 2nd edition, 1978), pp. 203-217.

Soc.duke.edu. (2017). Wage Labor and Capital. [online] Available at: http://www.soc.duke.edu/~jmoody77/TheoryNotes/Weber_WLC.htm [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017].

Tipalti (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-labour-and-capital [Accessed 16 Oct.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Global Problems And The Culture Of Capitalism Analysis
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Global Problems And The Culture Of Capitalism Analysis

    Capitalist divided and valued a worker based on their “race, religion, ethnicity, age, and gender” this lead to a “labor aristocracy” that uses discrimination to force workers into, “accept[ing] lower wages and less…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Frances Scott Key's The Start-Spangled Banner
    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Frances Scott Key's The Start-Spangled Banner

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx And Samuel Smiles Analysis
    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx And Samuel Smiles Analysis

    This German philosopher was in the midst of many revolutions throughout his time. At one point, he was known as the spokesman of the ‘Communist Party’ in 1848, which signifies the kind of involvement he was intervened within at the time. Although Marx was a member of a wealthy family in which he utilized to acquire good education, he was a philosopher who critiqued capitalism. Marx attacks the bourgeoisie families and individuals who happened to be property owners or factory occupants, and critiqued these families and individuals because he believed as property owners; they would need to hire people in order to operate the property. His idea of discarding the middle class was revealed in the third idea of his book The Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Marx's Estranged Labor
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of Marx's Estranged Labor

    In this piece, Marx discusses the concept of “Estranged Labour”, about which he goes into great detail. He begins by stating that the current political economy takes the worker from the level of a human, to that of a commodity. He describes this as “the most wretched of commodities”, as the commodification of the worker is always done in contrast to success of the land owner. This creates two classes, the property owners and the propertyless workers, with a stark distinction between the two. The political economy that creates this distinction is run by greed, which is fueled by competition.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx
    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do Illegal Immigrants Enter South America
    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why Do Illegal Immigrants Enter South America

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx Bourgeoisie Analysis
    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx Bourgeoisie Analysis

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Sociology: Curging Gang Violence
    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sociology: Curging Gang Violence

    Joseph, J. (2005). Social theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Marx, K. & Griffith, T. (2013). Capital.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marxism In Fight Club

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln Park Discrimination
    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lincoln Park Discrimination

    Given the laws of supply and demand wage regulations were created, it was during the 17th century that workers began forming unions in order to strike on wage laws that were in place. It is in 1791 that we are introduced to Le Chapelier Law which declared: that wages ought to be a little higher than they are,...that they ought to be high enough for him that receives them, to be free from that state of absolute dependence due to the want of the necessaries of life, and which is almost that of slavery," yet the workers must not be allowed to come to any understanding about their own interests, nor to act in common and thereby lessen their "absolute dependence, which is almost that of slavery;" (MARX 904) In this example Marx give two very important points from Le Chapelier Law; a) the value of the wage and b) the separation of the commons. The wage that was given was not connected to the actual product of the worker, instead in order to control the worker a minimal wage is set that will give the worker enough to not get his own desires in life but instead the focus is to give the worker enough to not be dependent on the state. One would think that the result of the commons not being dependent on the state would cause the commons to unite and become dependent on each other but since the state has outlawed such a unity the worker has become an “independent peasant” working not for a community but for themselves.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Heinrich Marx
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Heinrich Marx

    Let’s now turn to the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, which will be the main source through which Marx describes these concepts. Marx states: “The worker sinks to the level [...] of the most wretched commodities; that the wretchedness of the worker is in inverse proportion to the power and magnitude of his production” (70). It is through this wretchedness, that the wage labourer is reduced to a commodity, and becomes a tool for the capitalist to gain excessive wealth, of which the wage-labourer sees little of. Although, the main problem is not so much the small amount of monetary gain the wage-labourer receives, but the impact the small monetary wealth has on his way of living – how the miniscule compensation infringes on his ability to cultivate that which is properly human. Infringe, insofar as, the wage-labourer is unable to engage in practical activities that cultivate those components considered to be properly human, because the labour he engages in to receive such small compensation, leaves him with no resources other than those that allow him to enlist in rote behavior, both inside his place of work and in his own home.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Struggle In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Struggle In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    Agreeably, the “Communists Manifesto” delivers a clear reflection of the reality instead of the actions of the present-day leftists. For illustration, Marx appreciates that labor is just like any other product and, it fits in rule of demand and supply in a transactional capitalist economic setting. The author states that if the society increases the supply of its labor, the demand for the work reduces as well as the prices or the wages for the effort…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx: The Dehumanization Of Labor
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx: The Dehumanization Of Labor

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marxist Critique Of Capitalism Analysis
    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxist Critique Of Capitalism Analysis

    Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market”. Karl Marx was a socialist, born in Prussia in 1818. He is considered by many to be the father of modern day communism. Marx and his followers were very critical of capitalism for three main reasons. This essay will distinguish and evaluate the three Marxist critiques of capitalism.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Hunger Games Marxism Analysis
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Hunger Games Marxism Analysis

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings