Pros And Cons Of Living In A Socialist Economy

Improved Essays
Pros and Cons Between Capitalist and Socialist Economy
Courtney N. Harris
Everest University

Abstract In this is essay I will explain my personal opinions on the benefits and downfalls of living in a Capitalist economy as opposed to living in a socialist economy. Julie Marshall and her cousin Jean-Paul have been communicating back and forth through e-mail discussing the benefits of her moving to the U.S. Jean-Paul is currently living in Belgium, which is a Socialist Economy. Julie Marshall on the other hand resides in the U. S., which is a Capitalist Economy. In the following essay I will provide Julie’s opinions on the benefits of living in the U.S. and the downfalls of living in Belgium. I will also
…show more content…
When this results it is referred to as a term “Brain Drain.” This actually can be quite bad for socialist countries for they lose there hard workers, and successful people. When Julie brought this all to Jean-Paul’s attention, Jean-Paul agreed with all of these benefits, but then replied with what is provided with in a Socialist economy and is not provided in a Capitalist economy. Just to name a few would be in Belgium the provided free college education, free health care, as well as free childcare. All of these things are huge perks, but at the end of the day does a free ride pursue more beneficial then personal success? To conclude this essay I will provide my personal opinion for living in the U.S. I believe that not all people work and strive for a better life then others. In my opinion this does not make you wrong, but should also not take away from the people who do. Everybody is born with all of the same capabilities with in him or her selves to have the life that they desire. Therefore in my opinion I do not believe that free education, health care, or childcare amount to the opportunities to be as successful as your heart

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My revision is to elaborate on the economic system portion of my review and to add additional information. In this week's assignment, I selected to address the Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company case, where Lilly Ledbetter filed discrimination for gender pay. Capitalism and socialism both serve as a crucial part of the economic system for this setting. Some of the characteristics of capitalism are better working conditions, better wages, the profit motive, competition, and greed. In reference to the socialist theory which is practically the opposite and is not motivated by personal self-interest.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I personally feel that capitalism is what abuses bad decisions such as gambling and attempting to win off what others bet or risk, whereas socialism would have a systematic approach of preventing bad decisions and enhance them. Thus, the United Sates is not in a condition to adopt socialist ideas to its entirety but rather over time, there could be a democratic socialism which would adopt the positive aspects of both a democracy and socialist society while possibly eliminating harmful traits of oligarchies and capitalist societies. Therefore, would have to choose his third form of equality of opportunity which is the socialist equality of opportunity over first two…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the unfair distribution of capitalist system, caused the social wealth disparity and serious polarization. On the other hand, if capitalism is inequality, unfair and not free to the poverty and working class, so I think that capitalism and socialism is not significant difference between the two. In my country, although China 's political system is the socialist system, but the life of the poor and working class in China is much more tragic than the people live in western capitalist countries (for example, Canada and United State). In my opinion, I think as a blue-collar workers in Canada is far much better than engage in the same profession in China. Although Canada’s high taxes , but the government provide a lot of care and allowances for blue-collar workers (for example, construction millwright,carpenter and electrician) such as medical care, unemployment insurance, etc.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In socialism you can not take a big risk in order to gain a big profit because everything is equal. If there is a chance to make a good profit and to be successful, capitalism allows you to take the risk. Mrs. Newman took a risk to sell beauty products…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx In the most recent election, an actual socialist ran. This raised many questions and Bernie Sanders has fooled millions of people into thinking about the viability of a socialistic government in the United States. Derrick Wilburn in his article, “Is capitalism really better than socialism or communism?” makes a case for American capitalism and attempts to convince those on the fence that socialism and communism are “the height of human arrogance.” Wilburn argues in his article that despite people’s best intentions, socialism and communism is a set up for an era of governmental rule and the slow diminishment of individual freedoms.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dwight D. Eisenhower said in his first inaugural address, “A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.” Different countries have different morals and policies. The belief that your country should have to provide everything for you is wrong in my eyes. The accessibility of the “American Dream” has been a reoccurring debate. Society should provide you with the opportunities needed to succeed, but they shouldn’t force you to use them.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why not Socialism Socialism in theory sounds very appealing however, in practice it’s a disaster. Gerald Cohen a pronounced philosopher talks about how socialism could be good for people. Although, his arguments are weak and unclear on why socialism is better. It brings up the question on how can socialism be better than capitalism, and why his argument isn’t convincing. In his book, Why not Socialism he talks about the pros about having a socialist system.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years, the “American Dream” has been up to anyone’s interpretation. People see America however they want to see it, creating people coming from the same places having differing views of the country they call home. To ask if any one essay, speech, or other writings could complicate or even challenge the American Dream is preposterous. However, in terms of the essay topic, this writer finds that this essay confirms the American Dream, not just because of Americans’ right to free speech, but because this writer agrees with the message of Zinsser’s essay: people shouldn’t be afraid to fail.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on the type of economy one lives under, their entire life is impacted. From wages to insurance, the economic structure a country practices has a wide range of implications that can vary based on each structure. The three main forms: capitalism, socialism, and mix economies all have costs and benefits when compared to each other. While capitalism focuses on a lack of government interference, socialism completely relies on government regulation. Mix economies take aspects from both.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This main contrast sets a myriad of opposite postures that have a socio-economic and political impact. For example, the capitalist system base individual prosperity on free market with a small government and the opposite, considers government controlled industries as a mean to social prosperity. While in capitalism companies are owned by the private sector; in socialism the government owns the companies. Individual freedom to property, competition and assets management contrasted by elimination of private property and government welfare programs that provide same social benefits. Capitalism can cause huge distance between the classes which can result in social uneasiness, while Socialism systems attempts to assure social equality.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While I started to incorporate my voice into the previous papers, I did not fully understand the benefits of doing so. This essay allowed for me to support my thesis about the American Dream with my own experiences since the thesis was essentially my own definition of the American Dream; furthermore, I realized how my experiences would help strengthen my argument and my voice. I also was successful in adding outside sources in my essay that would support my claim. Before, I always stuck with the sources provided to me, but with this essay, I added outside sources that strengthened my argument. In addition, I did not take the typical side for this paper.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socialism is the idea of a social organization that supports production, distribution, and trade should be controlled within the community itself. The social part of it means that everyone pays for all of the production. In socialized healthcare, everyone pays into the system and those who need care get it without extra charge. The same goes for roads, energy, or any other infrastructure project - we all pay the same and have access to the same benefits. The problem such a system runs into, however, is that there is often not enough money to go around, and because things are free, people get greedy and abuse the system.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Marxism

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Marxism is a lengthy topic complete with ideas and principles, but does Marxism establish the perfect society for all? In judgement, Communism, in a way can flourish in the hand of the right leaders. See Marxism was developed by German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883) who provided the basis for communism. It concentrated on equality of the people instead of providing the businesses and corporations although some may argue otherwise. To Marx, such a utopia was not only had potential, but it was highly expected.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Law The article portrays the French revolution after the 1848 revolution; whereas the turning point in France of socialism. The article was written over 100 years ago by Frederic Bastiat, basically describing the law, and the direct force in a society, and quoting Life, liberty, and property play a major role in a free society. Bastiat talks about the force implicated in the enforcement protecting said rights, and should the force keep all individual rights of every person? The ability to control labor by laws implicated in favor of the wealthy, essentially stealing from the masses.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As history progresses, many theories were created. Among these many theories is Marxism, which was created by Karl Marx and his colleague Friedrich Engels. They believed that capitalism has its pros and cons when it comes to human progress, however, conservatives such as Mathew Arnold did not share the same opinion. While Arnold argues that capitalism will lead humanity to take a step backwards towards barbarism, Marx believed it will bring humans closer to socialism and away from inequality (Franks, 30). Marxists began to argue that class is the source of inequality, however, many Marxists differed as to what actually defines a class.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays