The Rights Of Humans And Other Animals Analysis

Improved Essays
Do animals have as many rights as humans? When it comes to us humans we fight for our rights. Whether it is equal rights for races, similar to “Black Lives Matter”. Or how women have fought for their right to vote. Having the right to own guns and use them for defense. Even having the right of speaking our minds when something seems wrong or isn’t right. But when it comes to animals they don’t have the voice to speak against someone/thing. That is why there have been organizations and groups to fight for their rights and to take care of them. In the article The Rights of Humans and Other Animals was a good way to depict moral judgement 's and rights between humans and animals. The little introduction paragraph was a great way to portray the topic and the issue. It talks about humans moral rights, animals have those rights too but those may be more specific to scientific studying and/ or testing. ( Tom Regan- little intro) In this it talks about how moral judgement 's need to be defended, justified, and validated. (Tom Regan- pg 104, paragraph 4, sentence 5) In which makes sense, but moral judgments more have to …show more content…
When reading the difference between these two it was interesting to know the difference. (pg 107, paragraph 20) When reading paragraph 20 it was interesting to see that welfarists are more like PETA, while maybe smaller organizations solely focus on the little stuff like the rights of them always being fed.. “Although animal welfarists can have reformist aspirations, animal rightists are necessarily abolitionists.” (pg 107, paragraph 23, sentence 2) Under Animal Rights, page 109 it talks about the difference of human rights and animal rights by asking, “ Are any nonhuman animals rational and autonomous?” Then it goes on to say if primates or mammals are. But then in paragraph 33 in the last two sentences, it does say that animals too have rights just like

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine life without depending on any animals. For some it may be easy for instance a vegetarian but hard for the meat lovers. Animals do much more than just feeding us. They can find cures for diseases like cancer and AIDS. In the essay “The Evil of Animal Rights,” there is a group of people who disagree with animal testing.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are various sides and opinions on animal cruelty, and they all vary according to the type of animal cruelty being done. In the article Is Hunting a Form of Cruelty for Animals? Dawn Laney, of the Greenhaven press illustrates the controversy on animal hunting after it was reported in the 2005 Washington post, that a young girl shot the first bear of the Maryland Bear Hunting season. In the eighth edition of Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors Stuart and James Rachel in chapter 7.4, pose the question of how to tell whether the treatment of animal is right or wrong. Each one of these pieces of writing aim at a certain type of animal cruelty and talk about the supporting and opposing points in each argument.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paper 2 In this paper, I will discuss Mary Anne Warren's "Speaking of Animal Rights" which discusses the strength animals have to rights. Warren’s paper is rebuttal to Tom Regan “The Case for Animal Rights” I agree with Warren that humans' reason responsiveness makes human rights more important. I will explain her argument which focuses on humans' ability to listen to reason as morally relevant to the strength of their rights.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is wrong to mistreat animals because mistreating animals is like mistreating another human being. Animals feel pain the same way humans feel pain. They are living beings and bleed like humans bleed. This alone isn’t what distinguishes animals from having or not having rights. Animals do have rights to a certain extent.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal rights is the idea in which all animals have the right to their life and their most basic interest, like avoiding pain and suffering. Animal rights movements started in the west, the first public victory for animal rights activist was the Britain's Treatment of Cattle Act or The Martin’s Act, which prevents improper treatment towards…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student Course Date Singer’s Principle of Equal Consideration of Interest In his seminal work, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer, puts forth the principle of equal consideration of interest in which he argues that for any being that possesses interests, those interests must be considered to be correspondingly morally significant with the identical interests of another being. Singer applies this principle to all sentient beings and uses sentience as the crucial characteristic for admissibility into the moral society (Singer 57). Singer’s argument has been challenged numerous times, this one by Francis and Norman.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name: Lily Date: Endangered Animals How would you feel if animals were staring at you as you sat in a small cage? That’s how animals feel in zoo’s. Some people think zoos aren’t prisons I think critters should be saved from animal prisons or zoos.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Rights For Decades the American society as well as many others, have been participants in an ongoing controversy regarding animal rights and animal protection. This particular debate has raised so much havoc in the world today, considering activist for animal rights are very passionate and will not stop on the account of politeness to get a point across. A widely known animal rights group established in 1980, known as Peta are famous for throwing buckets of wet paint on a various victims wearing a fur piece of clothing to prove a point. Being an activist for animal rights opposed to being a non-activist has not only become two different beliefs, but two opposite lifestyles as well.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays