Humanitarian Intervention Essay

Improved Essays
Humanitarian intervention involves the use of military force to protect innocent people within a state from violence committed or condoned by its government. Presupposing an international framework predicated on the sovereign equality of states, it is commonly treated as an exception to the non-interventions principle, according to which the exercise of authority by one state within the jurisdiction of another is impermissible.

The concern here is that states might use humanitarian concern as a pretext for interfering in the domestic affairs of another state. This ambiguity pits the virtues of humanitarian rescue against the horror of having expanded opportunities for aggressive war and questions both the moral and political authenticity of
…show more content…
Forcefully intervening to thwart or remove this hindrance to freedom experienced by the local community vindicates freedom by coercively impeding its hindrance and must therefore be considered as concordant with the principles of right and justice. Holding on to the position that states are motivated only by self-interest, the cynic or realist might respond that this justification for humanitarian intervention is problematic at its core. Stripping away the pretensions of altruism, humanitarian interventions can be seen to be essentially motivated by the morally vacant or immoral instruction of personal gain. To justify intervention on moral grounds when it is in fact motivated by immoral or amoral concerns forwards the impression of inconsistency and incoherence. This harsh assessment neglects, however, the distinction between the doctrine of right and the doctrine of virtue. The only object of right in general is the external aspect of actions, right in its strict sense, i.e. right unmixed with any ethical considerations, requires no determinants of the will apart from purely external ones. The just quality of an action does not have to coincide with the moral character of the agent performing that action for the action to be recognized as just. Neither does the just quality of an action depend on the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What is meant by the humanitarian stance is that intervention into the nation is necessary in order to bring change that is beneficial. This intervention typically means war in the name of some political or other change. Again, the humanitarian views can be seen in Kennedy’s presidency. Te Bay of Pigs invasion might be the best possible example of this.…

    • 2455 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He rejects three of the principals of the paradigm that together create a strict policy of non-intervention. Walzer argues that an intervention on humanitarian grounds can be justified in certain circumstances. This essay lays emphasis on two main revisions: that states can justly intervene with the issue of succession or ‘national liberation’…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legalist Paradigm Analysis

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The exception of intervention in other conflicts is categorized into three main subfields. Primarily, war is justified when a set of boundaries contains two or more political communities, one of whom is engaged in the struggle for independence. This is the issue of secession or “national liberation.” Subsequently, the next revision is that of counter-intervention stating when the boundaries have already been crossed by the military force of another foreign power, intervention is justified. The last revision to the Legalist Paradigm deems a just intervention when there are large scale violations of human rights within a set of boundaries.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The world’s reaction to the Rwandan genocide in 1994 is widely considered as one of the biggest failures of humanity and the UN, hundreds of thousands of innocent lives were lost over the course of the 100 day mass killing. The response has been described as” too little, too late” as an earlier intervention could have saved many more lives, which brings the question why did the world wait? Why did we fail all of these innocent people? The answer lies within the structure of our world’s political system and the different ideals and definitions of key concepts by different states. While no one state can be blamed completely for the lack of aid, the Rwandan genocide brought forward the need for a more comprehensive action plan for intervention…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The doctrine of “humanitarian intervention” has long been a controversial subject, both in law and in international relations, and remains so today. Hugo Grotius, in his classical work specifically lists humanitarian intervention as one of the just causes of war. Basis of Humanitarian Intervention: Humanitarian Intervention and UN Charter The UN Charter under Art.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather, now that the war’s proponents are relying so significantly on a humanitarian rationale for the war, the need to assess this claim has grown in importance. We conclude that, despite the horrors of Saddam Hussein’s rule, the invasion of Iraq cannot be justified as a humanitarian intervention. After, I discussed some of the important aspects that related by humanitarian intervention. Also, some of the important ways that international community could use to stop humanitarian crisis.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his article, ‘Humanitarian Disintervention’, Nili (2011) presents a deontological argument on the primary significance of ‘negative’ duties during humanitarian crises. Using Pogge’s rationalisation of negative duties and Wenar’s legal framework, Nili argues that affluent liberal democracies and their citizens are accountable for international human rights violations as they breach their negative duty “not to harm” by indirectly sustaining oppressive regimes (pp.33-34). Nili suggests that liberal democracies confer “trading privileges” upon oppressive regimes through resource purchases which accordingly transfers resource rights from unconsenting citizens to authoritarian leaders; these leaders then use their gained wealth and power to prolong their brutal regimes (pp.33-38). Nili contends that liberal democracies’ negative duties thus include economically disengaging with oppressive regimes through boycotting and…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nisun Aladewolu ENG 102 Professor DeCarlo 13 April 2016 America is basically trying to spread American freedom to these countries. Who could disagree that the people of the Middle East deserve democracy? The question is, Was the middle east more peaceful before the americans invaded it? What are we willing to spend in soldiers lives?…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tyranny of Experts In The Tyranny of Experts, William Easterly raises the important critique of modern humanitarian relief efforts. He does this by discussing four great debates and by showing the hypocrisy of organizations as they aid the regimes that they stand to eradicate. I find the most convincing of his many debates to be the Blank Slate versus learning from history and I do not agree with Easterly’s opinions of the pragmatic approach. Easterly’s debate of Blank Slate versus learning from history is the most convincing of the four.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The current Syrian refuge crises is a defining moral event in this era, we are currently writing history with our reactions to the millions of desperate family’s looking for safety. As a planet and a country we must decide what moral era we want to live in, when we look back at events like the Holocaust, the genocide in Rwanda or the Bosnian war, millions could have been saved if we acted sooner and wile in the example of the Holocaust lives were saved after the intervention we could have done a lot more, and we look back at those times as immoral. This essay using the moral philosophy of Jeremy Bentham, Immanuel Kant, Aristotle and, Carol Gilligan will show how the reaction to the Syrian refuge crisis from the world Canada has been immoral.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “The Enemies of Empire,” the author discusses an argument that develops between two different perspectives on imperialism and anti- imperialism after the Spanish- American War. He mentions that many Americans supported the idea of expansionism while others opposed it. He asserts that the people who supported the idea of imperialism believed that it was an American duty to intervene in other countries affairs in order to liberate the oppressed. Conversely, he states that other people were against these expansionists for America being involved in foreign wars for various reasons. Likewise, the author of the article “Totaling Up; It Was an Unjust War” explains the main justifications that President Bush offered to go to war with Iraq.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Darfur Crisis Essay

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Darfur crisis was the first case of genocide in the twenty-first century. The killings of the Darfur crisis began in 2003, and it was carried out by a government-funded Arab Militias called the Janjaweed. The Janjaweed burned villages, murdered, raped, and tortured the civilians of Darfur. A total of 480,000 people were killed and over 2.8 million people were displaced. In 2004 the United States declared the Darfur crisis was an act of genocide.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Studying Genocides: A Gradual Process to Prevention There have been hundreds of genocides throughout history, but it is only within the past few centuries that their impact has come to be fully understood. The word “genocide,” which is now a concept understood by most people, was first used only 73 years ago. As genocides continue to occur even today, a deeper insight of what is at their roots continues to develop. By teaching about genocides, one can continue to learn about and understand the prominent circumstances and conditions that lead to a genocide.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Walzer makes a compelling argument in his article on global crisis, “the Argument about Humanitarian Intervention”. Walzer argues that humans have always been fighting each other and causing global problems. He claims that with today’s technology it has never been simpler to kill large numbers of people, if one has the resources of course. Walzer poses the question that in the event of a humanitarian crisis, such as cases of severe war crimes or ethnic cleansing, to what degree should the rest of the world respond? In Walzer’s article he discusses four major questions.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Endless Humanitarian Crisis The humanitarian crisis of this world is at a level never seen in the history of man. Not since World War II have there been so many refugees or IDPs. In 2014, there were almost 60 million refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) around the globe right now. Put another way, that’s one in every 122 people worldwide. An immediate and perhaps unprecedented action has to occur to react to the unprecedented amount of people in dire need of necessities.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics