Compare And Contrast Brutus And Mark Antony's Speech

Decent Essays
The most important and critical single moment of the tragedy of Julius Caesar doesn’t occur while the namesake is alive or even during his murder, it is the funeral speeches given by the opposing sided after the conspirators follow through with their plan. Once the head of state is dead, there is a power struggle in Rome. There are many characters involved in this struggle but there are two clear cut sides, those who supported Caesar and want revenge, led by Caesar’s right hand man Mark Antony, and those who wanted Caesar to be assassinated and want new leadership, led by the noble Brutus. Ultimately, Mark Antony was able to win the support of the public. This is no coincidence and no matter of chance, Antony was by far the superior speaker …show more content…
The speech given by Brutus lacked emotion almost entirely. His speech was given in a manor of which to say that his was the correct side and the crowd was expected to accept it as such. Since his oration was as firm as it was the crowd had no real emotional attachment to it and wasn’t able to invest their feelings into his side. Mark Antony, however, choose to make his speech emotionally charged and the driving force behind his entire eulogy. Pathos is the force that gives Mark Antony’s speech its power and it is illustrated best when he has to stop his speech to “cry” over Caesar’s body. Shakespeare purposefully included lines here such as “Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping.” (Act 3 Scene 2) to show how the crowd reacted to his emotion. When Antony stops to “cry” the first signs of the plebeians changing their mind is also shown. The pathos appeal driving home the points of his opening statement are what really start to get the crowd thinking and what pulls them more and more away from Brutus’s …show more content…
Brutus tells the crowd that Caesar’s death was necessary because of how ambitious he was and because of his lust for power. This is the only reason given by Brutus for his assassination. One thing that Brutus did stress, however, was that the murder was for the good of Rome and without it, the population would “die a bondman” because of the ambition of Caesar. Antony is quick to refute Brutus’s argument. It is logos that helps Antony win this section of the argument. He starts by reminding the crowd how “honorable” all of the conspirators are and then, he also reminds them of how Caesar refused the crown to become king. “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (Act 3 Scene 2) Not only does he here refute Brutus, but he makes the crowd think about what he has said by asking them a question. He provides more reason before he pauses to “cry” over the body of Caesar. The points he has raised about how it was impossible for Caesar to be ambitious in a way which merited murder planted the seeds of uncertainty about what Brutus said in the crowd and the perfectly timed paused allowed those seeds to sprout by allowing the crowd to mull over these thoughts with each other. To drive his side home, Antony read the will of Caesar. Whether or not it was made up by Antony or not, he read to the population of Rome that “under Caesar’s seal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During this time Antony is trying to come up with something that will not only discredit Brutus, but also make the citizens band around him. So he goes “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me”. Antony uses this quote to emphasize how much he loved Caesar, and the sadness he feels now that Caesar is gone. It is this grief that makes the citizens of Rome sympathetic to him, thus leading to them to wonder if Caesar death was…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Antony’s speech, the crowd calls the deceased Caesars names and acknowledge Brutus as if he was their savior. Brutus ask the crowding a very common-sensed question whether if they didn’t loved Rome and freedom, majority of the crowd answered no. Immediately after the crowd answered the risky question Caesar had to be immediately killed. What Antony did for his own good and maybe others explained that he is a calm man who allows common sense to answer his questions and others as well. Antony does not seek action with resisting Caesar’s murder but his words spoke a bit louder if he were to act on the situation.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rylee Sellitto Ms. Heaton RL 1 English 10 November 4th, 2015 Effectiveness From Logical and Emotional Appeal Have you ever noticed the differences between two speeches by listening to how each persuades the audience with their words? In the tragedy Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar gets stabbed in the back by the conspirators and dies. After his death, both Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people of Rome, expressing their logic and emotion behind Caesar’s assassination. Antony’s use of logical and emotional appeals swayed the Romans and proved his speech more effective than Brutus’s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Suggested Score 80% Accept Suggested Score Manual Score: Manual Score Prompt Rubric | Checklist Two Julius Caesar Speeches Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony tries to connect with the emotion of the plebeians by saying phrases such as “when the poor hath cried Caesar hath wept”(JC III, II, 100). In his speech Antony uses pathos and exaggeration as he is trying to make Caesar look like a great person and someone who helps the poor in order to sway the plebeians. Brutus in his speech uses logic or logos but Mark Antony knows that human emotions will be stronger than logic so he exaggerates how great Caesar is to fire up the plebeians. One more way Antony uses pathos an exaggeration to earn favor of the plebeians is during his speech when he is about to read Caesar's will he says “if you tears prepare to shed them now”(JC III, II, 181). Antony is appealing to the emotion of the crowd by reading the will and talking about how Caesar loved them an this helps but his speech above the speech of Brutus because they could not connect with his speech.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, Julius Caesar, everyone sees Antony as a noble man. He speaks at Caesar’s funeral for the “sake” of Brutus, who the crowd refers to as honorable and sincere. By associating himself with Brutus, Antony gains authority. He skillfully persuades a crowd that loves Brutus, that Caesar wasn't ambitious and that Brutus isn’t honorable. By using verbal irony, an anecdote, and imagery which appeals to the audience's emotions, Antony persuades the crowd that Caesar’s death was not reasonable.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Brutus addresses the crowd with logic and reason, Antony uses emotion. The use of rhetorical questions, parallel structure, and repetition by Brutus and Antony throughout their speeches changes the views of the crowd and what they should believe. While…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On March 15, 44 BC, Brutus killed Julius Caesar for the freedom and protection of Rome. According to Brutus he says, “I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him but as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (ll. 26-27). Another reason as to why he killed him was his ambition. Perhaps Brutus thought that Caesar had too much ambition.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays