Analysis Of US V. Curtiss

Improved Essays
Many people tend to wonder the actual power of the president. Is it just a title? Or is he secretly the most powerful man; much like a dictator? Well, by going back in time to specific court cases that could have swayed either way, one can easily tell that the president has more powers than everyone thinks. Many think that issues involving wars and foreign relations are solely powers given to the President, but these powers can be tested when problems occur that are not clearly stated in his job description. Through the analysis of Bas v. Tingy, Marin v. Mott, US v. Belmont, and US v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, these powers can be clearly outlined. Bas V. Tingy began with a discrepancy over that value of lost ships on the behalf of another country. The first congressional law regarding this issue stated …show more content…
Some believe the President of the United States can make decisions regarding foreign relations without congressional approval. Yet, many believed that only the bank had said on if they were going to cooperate with the Soviet Union. Others believed it should be the decision of a Court. In the end, the recognition of the Soviet Union and all other claims were deemed dependent on one another. The agreement concluded with the fact that States cannot interfere with the inner relations of a country. U.S V. Curtiss-Wright Corporation is yet another case dealing with the Presidential powers regarding foreign relations. President Roosevelt called for an Embargo in 1963, which is a temporary stop to the trading of goods with other countries. But, disobeying Presidential orders, the Curtiss-Wright company continued to sells bombers and planes to Bolivia. The President had a Joint Resolution that disapproved of any weapon sale to Bolivia. The Curtiss-Wright Company still believed they could sell these war devices to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Executive Orders There has been much controversy over the topic of Executive Orders. On the one hand, there are officials who support the President’s power to issue Executive Orders. On the other hand, however, there are those who are against it. To determine if Executive Orders serve a significant purpose, we must delve inside the world of politics and analyze the positive and negative consequences – the pros and the cons. But first, it would be most important to define the term and learn of its use and perceived importance.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will address the extensive debate regarding presidential powers and the fact that, though unwise and poor law, the War Powers Resolution is not unconstitutional. In order to determine whether or not the War Powers Resolution intrudes too deeply on standing presidential power, it is first necessary to identify the legitimate executive prerogative that the Congress may have infringed upon. Opponents of the War Powers Resolution make a serious argument on intrusiveness regarding only one executive prerogative, the President's power as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States”, which is said…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some would say that that the framers of the Constitution limited the power of the President enough by giving some powers to congress, but the more valid perspective is that the framers of the Constitution did not limit the President’s powers enough because some powers of Congress have changed to be the President’s powers. In the constitution, the President has many powers such as being Commander in chief of the army, appointing ambassadors and supreme court justices, and making sure laws are faithfully executed. The President has all of these powers, but more recently, the President has taken over some powers that Congress is supposed to have. The framers of the Constitution gave the President too many powers.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fully discuss the formal and informal powers of the presidency. Be sure to give examples. The President has a fairly large number of powers, so I will simply summarize them and point to you a more exhaustive resource. Formal Powers:Powers of Appointment The President is responsible for making about 6,000 appointments - the most important of which are his cabinet and federal judges (including the Supreme Court). Most of these must be approved by the Senate.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch. President Adams spent his last hours in officer appointing Federalist judge in all positions.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Presidency Domestic and Foreign Powers Widalvasky argues that presidents tend to be more focused on foreign affairs rather than domestic affairs. This claim stems from the fact that one of the enumerated power the constitution grants to the President in to negotiate treaties. Throughout the course of history, we have seen presidents become more involved in domestic affairs, particularly during time of crisis.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Executive privilege is a right held by the executive branch that allows the president to withhold information and while the Constitution does not grant this power to the executive explicitly, presidents have justified executive privilege using the Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine and the role of the executive branch in foreign affairs (O’Brien). The sole organ theory also asserts that the president alone acts as a representative on behalf of the country when dealing with foreign nations and in issues of international conflict (O’Brien). With regards to the treaty with Great Britain, Washington has the ability to invoke executive privilege in this case based on implied and explicit powers in the Constitution, the separation of powers doctrine, and precedent set by the Supreme Court. Certain powers are implicit…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ingraham v. Wright was a case where the Supreme Court had ruled (5-4 vote), on April 19, 1977, that corporal punishment in public schools did not violate constitutional rights. The case was brought up into court when an eighth grade student of a public junior high school in Florida, James Ingraham, who was paddled in 1970 by the principal Willie J. Wright and was also restrained by the assistant principal and the principal’s assistant (Lemmie Deliford, Solomon Barnes). James was hit by the paddle more than 20 times and required medical attention, later on a complaint was filed in 1971, other than Ingraham and a student named Roosevelt Andrews, another student has also been paddled. The complaint claims that the use of corporal punishment goes against the 8th Amendment, stating that it is a violation on the ban of ‘cruel and unusual punishments’, and the 14th Amendment which requires prior notice and an opportunity to be heard.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifty years ago one of three landmark cases in our Constitutional history took place. Gideon vs. Wainwright that took place in 1963 was a case fought between Clarence Earl Gideon and Louie L. Wainwright, a judge and member of the Supreme Court. Gideon was charged with breaking into Bay Harbor Pool Room in Panama City, Florida and entering with intent to commit petty larceny, a crime where someone steals someone else’s property. In court, Gideon asked for someone to represent him. The courts denied him a lawyer informing him that since he wasn’t being charged with a capital offense, the state of Florida could not grant him a representative.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Critics of the president’s power express their discontent at the president gaining power at the expense of Congress. Due to the vagueness of the powers outlined in the Constitution, many fear that the president can just run rampant and do as he wishes. When looking at the overall positives versus the negatives, the benefits of a strong presidency, namely unification of a country under an individual elected by the nation as a whole out, help rather than hinder our…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In most Supreme Court cases, the majority opinion usually sets the precedence for future cases and the concurrence has little to do with precedence. However, in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer Justice Jackson’s concurrence creates a three-tiered system for contested Presidential acts. Each tier gives the Court a reasonable idea how to determine whether or not the President’s act was constitutional or not. The first tier is the President’s highest amount of power. It combines his actions and the actions Congress has delegated to him.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 8 – Local vs. National Authority In Chapter 8 of Thirteen American Arguments, Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority. (a) List five issues that Fineman deals with directly in the book and briefly describe how each of those issues create tension between local and national authority. Hurricane Katrina revealed a fault in American politics. Although they had predicted the dangers, neither the federal government nor the state government was in command.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays