Rene Descarte's Argument For The Existence Of God

Superior Essays
Throughout the history of Philosophy the topic that is filled with the most arguments is the existence of a perfect being. Many people believe that a “perfect being” is capable of existing while others believe that the “perfect being” only exists in the form of God. Philosophy is flooded with arguments for and against the existence of God. I chose the photograph of The Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci because the picture itself is of a man who seems to be completely proportional, a man who is “perfect”. Rene Descartes a rationalist came up with his own Ontological argument he claimed that, God’s existence is certain because existence is a necessary trait of perfection and God who is conceived, as a perfect being must posses all perfections. Descartes stated that existence is necessary to the concept of a God. Descartes argument came from the original Ontological argument …show more content…
The argument of evil states that because evil exists, God cannot be able powerful, all knowing and loving and good at the same time. Another argument is the logical problem of pain. The logical problem of pain is divided into three parts. The first part states that if God exists, God is supremely good and powerful. The second part states that: A good being eliminates all meaningless pain so far it can without surrendering a greater good. The third part states: there’s at least one meaningless pain that has been experienced that could have been prevented by a supremely powerful being without surrendering a greater good. Therefore there is no God. Even though the Logical Problem of Pain is valid it has a counter argument. Many people believe that pain and suffering was caused by the first humans wanting to think independently and decide for themselves what is good and bad for them. They wanted to think and choose anyhow they wished without taking their creator’s (God’s) opinion into

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    2) The 3-O God would have prevented unnecessary suffering unless the God could not do so without losing a greater good or permit evil equal or worse. 3) The 3-O god cannot exist. This argument is valid, but Rowe believes premises of the argument could be false.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first possible objection I can think of for Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence is that premise one could be false out of his seven premises because our perceptions change over time. For example if you say I clearly and distinctly perceive myself to have 20/20 vision when you are young doesn’t mean it’ll stay that way forever. This produces a potential misreading of what you previously clearly and distinctly perceived which has now changed. A second Objection to my argument is that the third meditation falls prey to a Cartesian circle. This means that the proof doesn’t work unless the premises support each other at the beginning and end.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To build his argument, Descartes begins by working with the premise of there being a God: “Clearly the idea of God, that is, the idea of a supremely perfect being, is one I discover to be no less within me than the idea of any figure or number. And that it belongs to God’s nature that he always exists is something I understand no less clearly and distinctly than is the case when I demonstrate in regard to some figure or number that something also belongs to the nature of that figure or number.” (Descartes, 59). In this quote, Descartes outlines why he believes that there is a God. The rationality he employs is based upon understanding the concept of God as being supremely perfect.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The existence of God is, and has been, a very highly debated philosophical argument that has bewildered philosophers since even before the age of ‘Enlightenment.’ Many of the different arguments put forth have not adequately proven God’s existence, although, in order to move forward, failed arguments must be studied to ensure that mistakes are not repeated. One such argument is that of Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument. Anselm’s ontological argument is about the fact that nothing greater than God can be imagined.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In review of the three arguments related to the Proof for the Existence of a god, I found all three arguments to be very convincing, opinionating and interesting. These arguments appeared to be based on personal opinions, while convincing the reader to their beliefs from either a religious view, logical view or natural purpose view. The concept they all appeared to have in common was that they all believed god did exist, which I found to be very enlightening. My impression of each argument would be in the following comments.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ontological argument is an a priori demonstration of the existence of God. Perhaps one of the most famous ontological arguments presented was by St. Anselm (1033-1109) who was an Archbishop of Canterbury and Abbot of Bec. He presented his argument in his book Proslogion. Anslem’s expectation for his argument was for it to help him understand the nature of God, and possibly persuade a non-believer of the existence of God.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “On being an Atheist,” H. J. McCloskey proposes multiple arguments to his fellow atheists that the God’s existence is not justifiable or sound. The main arguments McCloskey debates in his article are the Cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the argument of design. He sums up atheistic debate with the problem of evil and how it directly serves against the existence of God. The first thing should be noticed about McCloskey’s arguments is how he claims his arguments are absolute proofs. Many of his arguments throughout this paper also imply that they can establish the case for God and shouldn’t…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God: The Existence Of God

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Existence of God The question of whether God exists or not is a difficult question to answer because there is no definite proof to prove He exists. It has been such a controversial topic that to this day there is still no universally accepted answer. A scientific point of view and a religious point of view, both have their own reasons and speculations and although some points are mutually accepted, there is no mutual answer to this question. A great majority in the scientific side will believe God does not exist while the religious side disagrees and vice versa as long as both sides have no solid proof. By a solid proof, I mean something where people can clearly see that it is in fact proof of God’s existence.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ontological argument is theory of God based on reasoning alone. The word ‘ontological’ means ‘being’ or ‘exist’. The ontological argument states that God does indeed exist because he is the thought of God can be conceived. The argument was first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, a monk and christian philosopher. Anselm believed that God was the greatest being conceived and that there was no other being more powerful than God.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have talked about many different types of arguments for the existence of god. However, only one seems interesting to me and that was the ontological argument. There are so many who studied this argument that I find it so interesting to see how they all found it and explained it. The ontological argument is the argument based on reason. It is based on the very being of God.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is obvious to him the idea of God could not have come from himself because God is perfect, and infinite, which Descartes is not nor has he ever experienced. Therefore; God is the ultimate cause of our idea of God, because Descartes could not have been the cause of the idea because he is not infinite and the idea of something can only come from something that truly is. Thus, God exists and is the cause of our idea of…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The existence of God is always important in the aspect of philosophy. St. Thomas Aquinas explains what he believes is the five reasons god exists. The five reasons he believes why God exist is the Argument from Motion, Efficient Causes, Possibility and Necessity, Gradation of Being, and Design. The definition of God means that which nothing greater can be meant. St. Aquinas is a known philosopher for his discussions of the relationship between faith and the reasons, including the five reasons and proof why God existence is true, while developing Aristotelian doctrines within the church (PBF 42).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays