The Importance Of The Atomic Bomb On Japan

Improved Essays
It was July sixteenth, at 5:29 a.m. A luminous explosion was resounding over the black scorched sand in Los Alamos, Mexico. The dirt screamed death and destruction, warning the world never to take the path of nuclear weapons. This was the testing of an atomic bomb, a model for a bomb that may demolish the innocent souls of those living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The building of the bomb to detonate on Japan is a point of much controversy. Many claim that America will unjustly murder innocent lives, while others still believe that bombing Japan will ensure Japan’s surrender and an end to the war. The decision to bomb Japan will result in the unnecessary annihilation of Japanese lives to terminate the war, and therefore, the bomb should never be dropped. Many officials and …show more content…
In April and May of 1945, the America’s Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu talked with the neutral Swedish ambassador eager to “ascertain what peace terms the United States had in mind (“Institute for Historical Review” 1). In addition, in July of 1945, the Emperor of Japan telegraphed President Truman, insistent on peaceful surrender (1). Japan clearly expresses their desire to peacefully surrender, because their circumstances restrict them from continuing to fight. The US secretary of war, Henry Lewis Stimson is insistent that Japan will surrender without the detonation of the bomb because of their desperate situation: “Japan has no allies; its navy is almost destroyed; its islands are under a naval blockade; and its cities are undergoing concentrated air attacks” (“Was the US justified... “ 1). For that reason, Japan will not fight effectively, therefore devaluing the argument that Japan will be able to fight without surrendering. The Emperor of Japan’s plea to to surrender in addition to Japan’s desperate situation provides concrete evidence that it is unnecessary to drop the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Previous war with Japan had shown that the President was aware that Japanese could evade his land at any time. Human rights organization disapproves the decision of retaliating by nuclear weapons while political leaders support his action. It was a great lesson but a dilemma situation. Therefore, the controversial has created a debate among the writers who vary in their opinion regarding the use of the atomic bomb in Japan. References Amstutz, Mark R. (2005).…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor the United States retaliated on August 6, 1945, at 8:15 a.m. the crew of the Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb over the city of Hiroshima. The bomb detonated 2,000 feet above the center of Hiroshima, destroying 60% of the city and killing an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 people immediately. Due to amount of civilian deaths this led to, we often ask ourselves if the bombings over these Japanese cities were necessary. To debate wether the bombing was necessary we should pay attention to Japans decision to continue to not surrender after the first bombing. If a country is that proud and resilient for them to still refuse to surrender after one nuclear bombing killing between 70,000 to 100,000…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Did Truman Lose Ww2

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction (Hook 20). ” While Truman was awaiting a response from Japan, he issued air raids over Japanese soil. One option Truman had was to continue the air strikes over Japan instead of releasing the bombs until they surrendered. This did not phase the Japanese; they would rather watch their city become destroyed and their people starve than surrender to the Allies. Japan’s population was over twenty-eight million and they all were willing to risk their and their family’s lives to save their emperor (Hook 20).…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “No” article, “Assessing the Roads Not Taken” by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa claims that there were less destructive alternatives that could have been taken that would have still lead to Japans’ surrender. Although both authors present very valid arguments, Hasegawa does an excellent job at presenting…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Soviet Union’s invasion of Japanese occupied Manchuria, the Japanese Supreme War Council had begun to vote on the action of surrendering. For this reason, the atomic bomb’s use on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not needed. Japan would have surrendered sooner than the end of the year. Another reason the atomic bombs were not needed to be used were that Japan’s refusal to surrender was only due in part to the Potsdam Declaration's statement that Japan’s Emperor Hirohito step down from his throne. Evidently, after Japan’s ultimate official surrender on September 2nd, 1945, the Emperor Hirohito was allowed to keep his monarchical position thus proving that the use of the atomic bombs were only barbaric vengeance by the United States.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Using the article Scientists and the decision to bomb Japan by Frish, D. H. We both referenced using the social lens that was observed in this article. Talks about who was involved in the decision processes, what the consequences would be, and what extent of the pre-knowledge prior to dropping the bomb. Also, lack of testing and the communication of information about the true destruction an atomic bomb would…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was an average, hot day in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. Home to the Japanese army’s Second General Headquarters, yet also home to 280,000 civilians, 43,000 military personnel, and 20,000 Korean forced laborers (Gray, Paul, and Kunii). Everything had been running accordingly, adults going to their jobs, school children assisting in the cleaning of the streets, until they saw a foreign object, hurling at them at a fast speed. It exploded before anyone had the chance to choke out the work ‘bomb’, leaving the menace behind the death trap, President Truman,a villain to Japan. The Japanese had attacked multiple places before the bombing occurred, including cities such as Shanghai, Manchuria, and most famously, Pearl Harbor.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was clear through how the emperor was only willing to surrender after the dropping of the bombs that he didn’t care as much about his people. Tokyo and other Japanese cities had been under continual firebombing and the emperor had kept pushing. If Hirohito was concerned about his people, he would have surrendered long before the Japanese people were in such dire circumstances. It would seem…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orthodox Vs Revisionists

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains controversial amongst the public. Traditionalists, also referred to as Orthodox historians, argue that the use of atomic bombs against Japan is justifiable on military grounds in order to prevent the costly invasion of the Japanese home islands. On the other hand, revisionists claim that the bombs were unnecessary in defeating Japan and were dropped in order to gain an advantage over the Soviet Union, their prolonged rival. Therefore, I support the revisionist claim which provides substantial evidence in the approved use for the atomic bombs, while the traditionalist claim fails to do so.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite of these evil deeds of the Japanese, it cannot be denied that Japan too has suffered from the fire bombings and the atomic bombings. Over the period of the bombings, thousands and thousands of Japanese civilians were killed or severely injured. This damage to the people was a result of United States abandoning the "last rules of warfare against civilians" (McNeill 1). The aftermath of the bombings were severely brutal. Around seventy of the Japanese cities were destroyed and around million civilians were killed (McNeill 2).…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays