The Principles Of Beneficence In Utilitarianism By John Kant

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… That principle of beneficence: The greatest possible balance of beneficial can lead to the action of right or bad. However Kant notoriously rejects the utilitarian understanding of a supreme principle of beneficence, but he still find a vital place in the moral life for beneficence. He seek universally valid principles of duty, and beneficence is one such principle. Kant argues that “everyone has a duty to be beneficence, i.e. to be helpful to others according to one’s means, and without hoping for any form of personal gain …show more content…
In this parable, robbers have beaten and left half-dead a man traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho. A Samaritan tends to his wounds and cares for him at an inn. The Samaritan’s action are clearly beneficence but it is right in ethically way? Samaritan is doing a right to help the robbers but the robber may not appreciate what he done for him. Because of the Samaritan action would the robber repentance what he done before and not robs again?
The saints always play an important role in the beneficence, they are always carrying out the acts of charity. Their behavior is not just one or two times but is always been continue because they think that this is their responsibility. Some people in order to benefit other, they sacrifice themselves, such people we call them heroes. They believe that the continuum of beneficence is their duty, and this also is their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the first theme of stewardship and helping those in need, we are presented with the parable of the Good Samaritan. The story goes about by explaining that a man was attacked, stripped of his clothing, and left on the side of the road. He was passed by a priest and Levite who both did nothing to help, as they just ignored him and carried on with their day. Then a Samaritan man took pity on him and healed his wounds, then brought him to an inn to care for him. An expert of the law was asked, “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore in the parable the good Samaritan, the Samaritan was the least likely person to help out a wounded Jew lying on the road. The Samaritan showed courage, compassion and love for another person even when that person probably hated…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his piece, Utilitarianism, Integrity and Responsibility, Bernard Williams critiques utilitarianism by examining two examples through a utilitarian perspective. Based on his analysis, Williams claims that utilitarianism doesn’t allow for integrity because the agent is not only responsible for his actions, but for those of others as well. The first example focuses on George, an expert chemist, who can’t find a job due to his poor health. This causes strain on his wife and children. A colleague offers to use his influence to get George a job at a laboratory studying chemical and biological warfare.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the person must only have one motive when providing aid; saving a life. Secondly, the Samaritan must be providing aid voluntarily. For instance, in order to be protected by the Good Samaritan law one cannot be asked to provide aid, they cannot get paid for it, nor can they expect to be paid. Third, the incident must…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mr Blue Character Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philanthropy is noble, but to the extreme where the giver ends up just as needy as the people he gave to. Blue gave so much away that, as his close friend rightfully worried, he ended up in a position he couldn’t help himself from. Blue got by over the years, seemingly because of God, but that doesn’t make homelessness and poverty any less dangerous. There was always a very real possibility that Blue could have starved or gotten sick, regardless of how devoted he was to his beliefs. Such actions are just…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ultimatum Game The game goes like this. A "proposer" is given an amount of money, typically, $10. He has to split this money with a "responder".…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Good Samaritans U.S.A. Are Afraid to Act, it states that “Instead of compelling reluctant or even incompetent people to intervene, we should concentrate on protecting Good Samaritans who act now, without force of law” (Sjoerdsma 336). Even if the United States enforced a law like this one it would not make people help the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kantian Moral Theory I agree with Kantian moral theory instead of utilitarianism because I find Kantian reasoning to be more agreeable than utilitarianism. Kantian moral theory believes that in order for people to act morally, people’s actions need to follow consistency, reasons, and fairness (Shafer- Landau 161-163). The Kantian moral theory further explains about maxim, which is essential to Kant’s argument.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many different situations, an action must be decided on. Mill and Kant each present two major theories as to how this decision is reached and how it can be judged as morally right or wrong. In the given predicament of Rescue I and Rescue II, each philosopher would argue for a different ethical approach based on the fundamental principles of their individual theories components of their theories. John Stuart Mills is famous for his views on utilitarianism. His view is revised from his teacher Jeremy Bentham’s theory of crude utilitarianism which introduces the Greatest Happiness Principle().…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This principle states that an action is morally acceptable only if it’s maxim is universalizable. There are three main steps to this principle: 1) formulate maxim, 2) imagine a world where everyone acts on it, 3) ask whether the action would be achievable in that world. If yes, the action is permissible. This shows a key difference between the principle of utility, as an action isn’t required with Kant, they’re merely acceptable. The next underlying principle with Kant’s theory is the principle of humanity.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the branch of normative ethics, a person discerns what is right or wrong behavior. There are several theories about what is right or wrong conduct, but two of the most popular ideas is Utilitarianism and Kantianism. Both set up strict methods of deciding how a person would know what the right thing to do in a situation would be. On one hand, utilitarianism claims that you can use intuition to discern what the greatest good for the greatest number of people is. On the other side, Kantianism claims that you can use reasoning and logic to discern moral obligations and rules.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays