Assess The Difference Between The British Parliament And House Of Commons

Superior Essays
British parliament has a two house system. This bicameral structure includes a house of lords and a house of commons. The house of lords is made out of people who inherited the position or were elected by the monarch and prime minister, while the House of Commons consists of members elected by the people. The house of lords has very small influence in the British government. The most useful action they can perform is to delay a law brought up by the house commons. It is delayed for up to a year, then that law is brought up again and voted on, if it passes the House of Lords can’t do anything else, therefore the law becomes law.
There are about 650 members in the House of Commons. The house of commons owns the majority of the power in British parliament. The house of commons has control over all legislative, executive, and judicial powers. To control the House of Commons, a party needs to get a majority vote. From there, whichever party gets voted in, has all the power. The other parties who didn’t win are labeled as the opposition and go against what the majority party tries to pass. Since the majority party is in control, anything they do can be passed, as long as they maintain party unity, because they can’t be outvoted. Whichever party gains control must select a prime minister. They must decide, within
…show more content…
presidential system and British parliamentary system have similarities in what powers they give to the government. The main difference is in how it’s distributed. In the U.S. system, a federal structure is used in which the power is divided at countless levels. The entire government is created from a large central government and smaller state governments. From there, the central government is split into three institutions which are independent from each other. An additional layer of power spreading comes from the limiting factors these three institutions have on each other. This produces a government that takes a long time to make actions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    for example the general election of 2010 withdrew legitimacy from Gordon browns labour government. Furthermore the uk parliamentary systems make it vital that members of the government can be made directly accountable to parliament and citizens. The government is constantly accountable to parliament as it must submit all proposals for law to parliament for approval. Also means that government ministers must report regularly to parliament. Overall parliament is held responsible or accountable to ordinary citizens at general elections whereby citizens have the choice to remove their MP and indirectly remove a governing party from…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are some theories that the United Kingdom being involved in the European union restricts the idea of parliament sovereignty, this being that the fact parliament is no longer the supreme law maker, as they have to involve European laws into the United Kingdom so the fact that parliament didn't make the law goes against the quote 'What the Queen in Parliament enacts is law'. The British constitution can be summed up in eight words, "what the queen in parliament enacts is law". This means that parliament using the crown, enacts law what no other body can challenge. In A.V. Dicey main theory in the law of constitution 1885 ; witch is sometimes seen as an out dated theory being one hundred and…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Halifax Blues

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The legislative power lies almost completely with the 338 members of the 'House of Commons'. These members are called 'Members of Parliament' and are elected by the body of voters for one geographical area. The party with the largest amount of these members usually governs the country and forwards the prime minister who is the political leader of the country. Another major role is taken by the federal cabinet that forms the executive power and whose members are called…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well, the Declaration of Independence influenced the constitution by setting out a guideline in which not to follow, as the Constitution then proceeded to create counteractions to prevent such governmental injustices from taking place. For example, the British had followed through on several problematic actions, such as quartering soldiers in the houses of the colonists. This was labeled in the Declaration and forbidden by the Constitution. This was done pretty much throughout the entirety of the Constitution. The government of the United States was originally meant to completely avoid the government that Britain has.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Canada Prime Minister

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the confederation of Canada in 1867 and the election of Sir John A. Macdonald as the first prime minister, the role of the nation’s leader has changed. While the prime minister is elected by the people to govern at the helm of Canada, “the excessive centralization of executive powers by the prime minister can damage good democratic government”. In our Westminster-style government, the power vested within the prime minister has become somewhat absolute, with too much control over the House of Commons. Over time, numerous factors have contributed to the decline of responsible government and the rise of the prime minister’s power. Such factors like the Canadian Constitution, the type of government, party solidarity and the liberty for the prime minister to choose members of both his Cabinet and the Senate have been crucial in the growth of power.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The U.S and Canada are very similar nations. They occupy the bulk of North America, share the same history of the British rule and rely on each other for trade and prosperity. These two sovereign states exhibit the same aspects and perceptions of the constitution and political culture. The constitution is defined as a government body that “lays down the ground rules for governance” (Larry, 2011). It also “constitutes the government” and “set up structures, offices and lawmaking procedures” (Larry, 2011).…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The american governemnt has three branches: printer friendly(PDF) our federal government has three parts.they are executive,legis;ative, judicial. The constitution of the united states divides the federal government into 3 branches to ensure a central government in which no individual or group gains too much control; legislative- make slaws (congress) executive-carries out laws (president, vice president, cabinet). Many terms describe the United States government. First of all, it is a democracy. This means the people rule.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The power of Prime Minister depends on the judiciary, executive and legislature authority. Parliament as a legislature power has two houses, upper House of Lords and lower House of Commons. The courts are the judiciary power and the executive is government. The…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Senators provide counsel on treaties with other nations and keep the other two branches of the Federal Government in check. The other part of the Congress—the House of Representatives consists of 435 people, each divided based on the State’s population. The House of Representatives, with the help of the Senate, passes federal laws. However, the House does have some special powers. For instance, the House has the power to initiate revenue bills and impeach members, whom they believe were in violation of law.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Members Of Congress Essay

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The United States and most Latin American nations have congress, Great Britain and most Western European nations have parliaments. A person becomes a member of a parliament such as the British House of Commons by being nominated by party leaders, voters generally choose between parties and parliaments tend to be made up of people loyal to the national party leadership who meet to debate and vote on party issues. A person becomes a member of the United States Congress by winning both a primary and a general election, elections in which personalities are usually most important to voters. A congress tends to be made up of people who think of themselves as independent representatives of their districts or states and who while willing to support…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparison of British and American political system The British and American political systems have both similarities and differences. Most notably, the British political system is a democratic constitutional monarchy, consisting of a monarch and a prime minister. The United States of America however, is a federal republic with a separation of power between three branches. Beyond these two key differences, the two countries have political similarities such as a dual-chamber, two dominating political parties as well as scheduled elections.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘separation of powers’ is a doctrine that has caused much debate through the centuries, and although it is difficult to find its exact origins, it is possible to distinguish a basic separation of powers doctrine from the writings of Greek philosopher Aristotle. He remarked that a constitution must have three elements to be effective. The three are, first the deliberative, which discusses everything of common importance; second, the officials…; and third, the judicial element. The English political theorist, John Locke, conceived a similar idea about the different types of power.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays