The BBC Prison Experiment

Improved Essays
Aim: The BBC prison experiment was a study that tested the psychological effect of people being placed in an environment where there was inequality in terms of power, status and resources. As stated by Haslam and Reicher, they “were trying to investigate the factors (e.g., social identification, permeability, cognitive alternatives) that determine when people act as group members and how they respond to an unequal social system.” (Haslam and Reicher, 2008).
Method: Fifteen men were chosen to participate in the eight-day long experiments, who were divided into groups of ten prisoners and five guards.
The guards arrived at the prison in blacked out cars. They were briefly given information the previous night as to making rules, all resources
…show more content…
Personal valuables such as watches and clothing were taken away and their hair was shaved off. The prisoners were then locked up in a small cell with two other prisoners. (‘Reicher and Haslam (BBC prison study)’, n.d.) Though prisoners were unhappy about their mistreatment, they still obeyed orders and realised their position as prisoners just as the guards had realised their role as superior figures. (‘The Experiment’, …show more content…
It has been suggested that the participants’ behaviour could be influenced by the fact they were aware that they were continuously observed and filmed by television cameras, and that the footage would be broadcasted on television. As Zimbardo stated in his commentary on the BBC prison study, “In our study, video-recording was concealed and never apparent to participants, and none wore microphones to make them aware of being under surveillance. In theirs, it was obvious that everything was being recorded at all times.” (P. Zimbardo, 2006). Zimbardo is possibly implying that Haslam and Reicher’s study could have produced false information due to this. But, Haslam and Reicher argued that the participants’ behaviours were supported by psychological or physiological evidence and testing. Furthermore, they explained that play-acting could not be the reason behind the participants’ behaviour changes and was highly unlikely over the long period of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a proposed two-week experiment that turned into a six day nightmare. “The original intent was to study whether the behavior of prisoners and guards was dispositional or situational” (McLeod, 2008). However, what they got out of the experiment was a “situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways” and where some of the guards “were behaving sadistically” (Zimbardo). The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most controversial studies ever conducted in the “history of social psychology” (Konnikova, 2015). The results of this experiment show the truth of how absolute power corrupts absolutely, why good people do bad things, and how it can be applied to real life situations (Dalberg-Acton).…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like Lord of the Flies, the experiment presented set rules and morals that stated how an individual should act towards one another, causing not only the guards, but the prisoners to fall into internal decadence. Through the sickening experience, the power the “guards” had most definitely got into their heads. “The Stanford Prison Experiment degenerated very quickly and the evil and inhuman side of human nature became apparent very quickly.” Also proven in the experiment is that the environment played a huge factor with the result of the guards beginning to harass the prisoners and play a more savage…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of the 75 people who answered the ad, 24 were selected after answering a battery of questions regarding their family, personal and mental health history. The 24 selected were judged to be the “most stable…most mature, and least involved in anti-social behaviors” (Haney et al., 1973). These subjects were informed they would be randomly selected to play the role of ‘guard’ or ‘prisoner’ and that ‘prisoners’ should expect to be under close surveillance throughout the experiment, as well as lose some of their civil rights during their ‘imprisonment’. ‘Guards’ believed the purpose of the experiment was to study the behavior of prisoners. They were given a pseudo orientation during which they were informed of their work and administrative duties as ‘guards’.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    They began tormenting the prisoners, subjecting them to humiliating tasks, as well as verbal and physical punishments. The abuse quickly became so severe that Zimbardo prematurely terminated the study after only six days. The Stanford Prison experiment exemplifies how, given unrestrained power and with the group dynamics of groupthink and group polarization at play, good men can be lead to commit evil actions very…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the “Stanford Prison Study,” students were affected by institutional forces of the prison system. Even though all students were of healthy, normal and stable mental capacities, they took to the roles “inmate” and “guard” without prejudice. The inmates became disturbed, but more surprising is how the guards became violent and brutal, inflicting physical force and harassment. Outside the experiment, students wouldn’t have forced an individual to do something against their will.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment revealed how social roles can influence our behavior. The subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of “prisoner” or “guard.” The attitudes and morals of the prison guards changed due to their role as prison guards. They mistreated the prisoners and made them feel less than a…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    No physical violence or elements that would lead to deindividuation were tolerated. The BBC itself gave its own guidelines. For instance, by creating a Guard Handbook, the production team expected the behaviours to be controlled in a way that weren’t harmful or anything of such (McDermott, Öpik, Smith, Taylor & Wills, 2002). It is clear that with rules of that sort, the ethicality of the Reicher and Haslam study was an advantage. However, it makes the findings questionable as whether the behaviours observed weren’t due to the fact that the individuals had to be aware of them, at all times.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    There was no training to be a prison guards, they were allowed to do whatever was necessary to…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by researcher, Philip Zimbardo is one of the most eye-opening social studies done to this day. It’s purpose was to find out more about how the social principles of obedience and conformity can affect the behavior of a normal human being. Zimbardo wanted to discover how social customs and hierarchy affect the roles people play, in a prison setting (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866). Though their purpose seems praiseworthy, the experiment itself was not. It was filled with ethical violations and in just 6 days, spun out of control (Lurgio, 2015, p.1866).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment (August 1971) was conducted by Philip Zimbardo and his peers at Stanford University to investigate the effects of 24 physically and mentally healthy male college students becoming guards or prisoners. One of the key elements present throughout the experiment was deindividuation, the loss of one’s sense of individuality. In deindividuation, the social identity consumes an individual completely in order for group norms to be maximally accessible. The central question of this report is, how can the events of the Stanford Prison Experiment be explained through the theory of deindividuation?…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the guards won’t let the prisoners tell their parents that they are being tortured and beaten. The guards had the prisoners write letters to their parents but they never shipped the letters out so none of the letters got to their parents. The guards got so mean and rude to the prisoners that they started to have mental breakdowns because they started to I believe that they were in prison. This caused The Stanford Prison Experiment to end after 6 days instead of lasting 2 weeks. This experiment affected the prisoners so much that those prisoners had to get a therapist to help them with their problem.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays