Reading Gladwell (2005) book Blink, the writer discusses different scenarios regarding critical thinking. Critical thinking can be several different things, it could mean taking that time to understand the situation and go through the problem solving process to fully understand before making a decision. Additionally, it could mean having the experience and knowledge to understand a situation and how to handle it differently versus someone that is inexperience. Sometimes it is merely trusting that gut instinct because thin slicing a situation could be the best solution. Regardless, different situations will arise that will require you to utilize several different forms of critical thinking. Additionally, as Gladwell (2005) and Facione and Gittens
…show more content…
Once those are eliminated it should be possible to utilize the problem solving process to locate the problem and provide reasonable solutions to correct the error. According to Facione and Gittons (2013) there is a five step process that could assist locating the problem and developing alternative solutions. First, identifying the problem, which in this example is that the research, analysis stated the audience did not like his music. Then we need to gather relevant information to understand how the research process was conducted. Then locating different options that could be positive and understanding options that are negative. Next, decide on a path to take to correct the situation and move forward. Lastly, time to reflect on the process and make any necessary adjustments (Facione & Gittens, 2013). When utilizing this process it would be possible to move pass the fear that music mogul made a mistake with this artist. Additionally, it would allow for alternative scenarios to emerge that this artist needs to be promoted more or that the way the research was conducted needs to be adjusted to determine if people really do not like his music. Unfortunately, many people make a split second decision by someone’s attire, the way things look or sound. Thus, it may be that they really would like the music, but they have not given the music a chance. Nevertheless, some individuals need additional assistance in regards to new things in their lives. Similar to how parents attempt to emerge their children in culture or art; it takes someone showing and individual something new before they can embrace the
Once those are eliminated it should be possible to utilize the problem solving process to locate the problem and provide reasonable solutions to correct the error. According to Facione and Gittons (2013) there is a five step process that could assist locating the problem and developing alternative solutions. First, identifying the problem, which in this example is that the research, analysis stated the audience did not like his music. Then we need to gather relevant information to understand how the research process was conducted. Then locating different options that could be positive and understanding options that are negative. Next, decide on a path to take to correct the situation and move forward. Lastly, time to reflect on the process and make any necessary adjustments (Facione & Gittens, 2013). When utilizing this process it would be possible to move pass the fear that music mogul made a mistake with this artist. Additionally, it would allow for alternative scenarios to emerge that this artist needs to be promoted more or that the way the research was conducted needs to be adjusted to determine if people really do not like his music. Unfortunately, many people make a split second decision by someone’s attire, the way things look or sound. Thus, it may be that they really would like the music, but they have not given the music a chance. Nevertheless, some individuals need additional assistance in regards to new things in their lives. Similar to how parents attempt to emerge their children in culture or art; it takes someone showing and individual something new before they can embrace the