Living By Epictetus Essay

Improved Essays
Philosophers have pondered the meaning of life for millennia. Some say that the meaning of life is to find happiness, or to flourish. But what is happiness? A stoic named Epictetus goes into great detail to explain how one should find happiness. In theory, living by Epictetus’ guidelines of only worrying about things you can control would be worth it and make you flourish; however, it is impossible to do so because human nature causes us to focus on things that are out of our control. Epictetus describes being truly happy as being free (Epictetus 1). To become free, you must give up on anything that is out of your control like body, fame, or power (Epictetus 1, 2, 24). Humans have no control over what happens to their bodies; if we are born …show more content…
Some of Epictetus’ advice is sound and would benefit a lot of people if it were followed, but I personally do not think that it can be followed. When someone close to us dies, it is only natural to mourn that person’s death. When someone mocks you, we feel hurt and embarrassed. To flourish in my opinion is to be completely stress free, but also living as a human being. Epictetus makes it seem like the only way to have a flourishing life is basically to become a robot that feels no emotion. Feeling no emotion would separate you from all external things, but how does that really make you happy. According to him, a perfect life would be to live in complete isolation away from all things, only taking in what you need to survive, and contemplating your own thoughts and ideas. I believe a great deal of human interaction is required for you to have a flourishing life. I would much rather know the pain of losing a loved one instead of instantly letting them go. I would also like to judge external things and feel sorry for myself when something bad happens to me. It all goes back to being human. Epictetus wants to cut off part of your brain in order to live a happy life, but if that were the way the god(s) wanted life to work then why wouldn’t they make us like

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Are you living life, right? What if someone told you that you were doing this whole life thing wrong all along? In reading the writings of transcendentalist, ones perception of life may be completely altered. The comparing and contrasting of modern day Americans lives and how that should, can be eye-opening.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the you tube clip, the narrator, Alain de Botton, described that the “good life” was the result of friendship, freedom, and diminishing one’s worries. He described a satisfied life was a basic and simple way of life. There were no commitments desiring fabulous or erotic customs or materialistic items which would suggest that an individual is doing rather well in with oneself or their environment. In Epicurus’ world the cluster of society’s greed could not fulfil an individual’s endearment, but the basic human instincts would yield a fortitude or collection of fulfilment or satisfaction. The body only needs what is necessary, or the bare essentials, to work itself through the attainment for having a satisfying life.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epictetus Quote

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Epictetus was a Greek philosopher who lived in ancient Greek, being born 50 A.D. Epictetus had a long life of some 85 years, but is not known for sure, as being born a slave to a wealthy man of Rome who allowed him to study Stoic philosophy, which teaches the development of self-control along fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions. Upon the death of his owner, Epictetus was a free man who began to teach philosophy around 93 A.D. Epictetus acquired many pupils, his most famous being Arrian. Arrian is said to be the one who wrote what Epictetus did not, meaning Epictetus did not write any documents. Arrian wrote what Epictetus said, an example would be, “No great thing is created suddenly”. This was a famous quote that can be…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epictetus taught that philosophy is a way of life and not just a theoretical discipline. To Epictetus, all external events are beyond individual’s control; everyone should accept everything that happens in daily life. However, individuals are responsible for their own actions, which they can examine and control through rigorous self-discipline. Different from Christianity, Stoicism…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness as by Aristotle means, “happiness depends on ourselves”. Aristotle felt that happiness was the central and reason to humanity. As well not just happiness but Aristotle had another thought, “virtue”, as explained in class virtue, meaning to have good morals and also good character. Being happy through ones lifetime, having good health, having healthy relationships and also being well off financially, having good knowledge and so on.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the suffering of fear of meeting hated enemies, Epictetus would advise one to take pride in themselves and be content with what they have in their lives. When one gains wealth in the beginning it is astonishing, however as they try to protect and upsurge their possessions they unavoidably attract enemies and negativity, inevitably bringing never-ending decay and demolition. If one remains indebted for their positon in life, they will not desire possessions, thus they will avoid inviting enemies. Epictetus would advise one to be content with their status in life. I am certain that he would enforce the idea of contentment, due to his constant mention of eliminating desires, and staying detached.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For Epicurus, happiness is seen as something both attainable and in your control through his philosophical teachings. Hobbes, on the other hand, describes happiness as the fulfillment of desires. Happiness, according to Epictetus, was believed to be that which is in our control. After detailing their definition of happiness, Aristotle, Epicurus, Hobbes, and Epictetus raise issues about happiness as well as the role that pleasures and desires play in achieving it.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The pursuit of happiness is a universal concept amongst humans. But is this concept universally believed and understood in the same way? Is happiness really the end goal, or does pursuing a meaningful life lead to a more fulfilling life? In an article from The Atlantic, “There’s More to Life than Being Happy,” Emily Esfahani Smith discusses the misconception of the pursuit of happiness and the difference between those who seek a life of meaning through the use of ethos, pathos, logos, and other rhetorical devices utilized within these methods. First, Smith expertly utilizes ethos throughout the essay to support her research by numerously stating the scholarly sources she uses.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau On Happiness

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    One may wonder if God is happy himself. Rousseau believes that happiness is the feeling of existence that fills one’s soul completely and that one can find “sufficient, complete and perfect happiness which leaves no emptiness to be filled in the soul” (Critchley 449). He then concludes that as long as this state continues, one can be self-sufficient like God. Rousseau assumes that God is self-sufficient and happy. His thought coincides with the Christian belief because Christians also believe that God is boundlessly happy Himself.…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    B00317142 What measures a happy life? Is it by a life that is void of struggle and hardships? Is it by how much money you make? Or perhaps by how many friends you have? Is it a direct result of physical pleasure?…

    • 1282 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is the good life? Many philosophers believe that they know what a good life is, what it consists of and how the good life can be reached. Lucretius, a Roman philosopher who followed the idea of Epicureanism, believed that simple pleasures and avoiding pain is happiness which leads to the good life opposed to Epictetus, a Greek philosopher who followed the idea of Stoicism, believed that one should never desire or seek pleasure whatsoever. Although Epicureanism may sound similar to Epictetus, the founder of this system of philosophy was actually Epicurus, who was Lucretius' role model. His philosophy "proposed that the ultimate goal of human life was happiness, and that the greatest good was to seek modest pleasures in order to attain a…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epicurus

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    meaning we do not need excessive things in our life to be happy…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory implies the fact that happiness can be achieved through multiple aspects of life and that each new situation has the opportunity to either enhance or diminish a person’s happiness levels rather than Aristotle’s view that happiness either exists or it doesn’t. Epictetus stresses that things in the world do not have the power to disturb humanity but rather the judgements that are placed on these things do. Happiness mainly stems from how easily people can recognize what is under their control as well as how they react to situations that they can encounter. Unlike Aristotle’s theory, Epictetus’ view on happiness seems to be one that most people can easily attain happiness as the highest good with. This is because Epictetus is correct in his statement…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is sometimes equated with pleasure, although this may be sufficient for animals, for human life one must strive for a divine sense of true happiness that is not the direct result of a single action. Aristotle makes the argument that pleasure is something that even animals can experience, this proving that there is no distinction between human life. For this reason, Aristotle believes that someone who simply strives for pleasure as the highest good is slavish and like a fatted cattle. As pleasures themselves change throughout one’s actions, it is important that one dedicates themselves to excelling and being virtuous, as being virtuous in itself becomes pleasurable. Although pleasure is still an important factor in excelling and living well, it is not the primary goal nor the highest good one can achieve.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will be comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness, and using these theories and views, examining if bodily and external goods are necessary to happiness, and to be able to back up why it either is or is not necessary. The two had many similarities, and differences that can be expanded. The Stoics believed our happiness was based off one thing entirely, and that is virtues. Aristotle breaks down how happiness is the highest possible good.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays