Government Surveillance Essay

Improved Essays
The United States government has been secretly spying on its citizens and has built a database that records every phone call made in the United States. Patrick Leahy, a senator from Vermont, said, “Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT ACT has been secretly interpreted to authorize the collection of America’s phone records on an unprecedented scale” (Leahy 1). Where does the government get the authority to do such a thing? According to Leahy, the government can only collect information that is relevant to an authorized investigation. But what authorized investigation is all of America’s phone records relevant to? Government surveillance is out of control and is undermining the basic human right to privacy in the United States. The intended purpose of government surveillance is to make a preemptive strike on terrorist attacks before they can happen. According to Lynn Reaser from Point Loma Nazarene University, “The sacrifice of a small amount of security may well be worth the benefit of saving lives” (Roger 4). To Reaser, the end justifies the means when it comes to surrendering freedom in the name of safety. Senator Susan Collins says, “One …show more content…
According to Glenn Greenwald, “History shows that the mere existence of a mass surveillance apparatus… is in itself enough to stifle dissent. A citizenry that is aware of being watched quickly becomes a compliant and fearful one” (Russel 2). Mass surveillance cannot end well for the United States. Programs like this are what whipped the Germans into submission by the Nazi Regime. Look at almost every oppressive dictatorship and one will find that there is one common denominator: the use of government surveillance to silence opposition. The United States was founded on the principle that the people have the right to free speech and the bulk surveillance system is posed to undermine that right if the people don’t fight against

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Article #1: Sinha, G. Alex. " NSA surveillance since 9/11 and the human right to privacy." Loyola Law ReviewWinter 2013: 861+. Academic OneFile. Web.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These electronic surveillance activities clearly violate the right to privacy that most Americans expect when they use simple, modern, and common…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jeb Bush Spying NSA

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The problem isn't surveillance -- it's surveillance without adequate oversight and targeting. National security could be preserved by a program, which also respects our civil rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act was instated in 2002 after the tragic 9/11 event. Times have changed and so have the objectives of the Patriot Act. The government should not have the power of surveillance because it is not being used as intended and gives the US a bad reputation. The government should not have the power of surveillance because it is not being used as intended.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the incident on September 11, 2001 we had an act that was passed in haste only 45 days after the attack. We had an act that was passed by George W Bush in a time of fear and unease . Even though we 're trying to protect American liberties from enemies, it is wrong to take away individual rights. One act before the patriot act was Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1968 Also called “Wiretap Statute” which restricted the government 's ability to listen to private conversation, both was controversial because it was signed in 1968 and we did not have the technology we had back then like laptops and cell phones which could be used in very bad ways to hurt or even worse kill people (Patriot)But it also could be a burden for the innocent people who have the government listen on to their private conversations which would take away their constitutional right to privacy. So too little of not listing and to much of listening in on peoples conversations is a bad thing, that 's why we should find a balance between the two so we don 't change the principles we have as a country .…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Research Paper

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having surveillance means that the government has the right to watch and record basically everything people do. The government put video cameras up in schools, buildings, stoplights, and satellites covering virtually everywhere. According to Alex Sinha (2013) NSA, the National Security Agency, started collecting as much information and data as possible from permanent residence in the United States in hopes of reducing the odds of another terrorist attack (p. 862). In 2013, Sinah also claimed in the early 1960s, NSA began keeping a “watch list” which was a list of American citizens who were traveling to Cuba and were questionable to pose a danger to the President (p.864). Sinha (2013) then goes on to state in 1967 the watch list turned into a systematic attempt to track those Americans who were questioned to be involved in a civil disturbance.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs to be solved. That is why we stand resolved that “The United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the horrific events of September 11 2001, the Congress has passed the Patriot Act and approved by the Senate and the House of Representatives. But on October 26, when the President Bush signed the Act, no House of Representatives or the Senate reports this. The extensive terrorist attack may be decreased, but the Patriot Act still have false charge and still be accused of dangerous rise of the government surveillance. It’s true that the Patriot Act has acted to violate privacy expectations and suspect regular Americans citizens. “It violates the privacy of millions of innocent people” (source 1).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nelson And Rubio Essay

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dear Senators Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio, It has been brought to my attention that the Government has access to surveillance systems that can monitor our phone calls, text messages, emails and etc if needed. I agree that the government should have this right, but I believe there must be some strict guidelines placed in order to ensure the personal privacy of citizens. While discussing this topic, it may seem scary to think as a citizen, that everything in our personal lives isn’t as private as we imagined it to be. But, the questions we all seem to ask ourselves about this issue is, “Why is all of our information so important to the government anyways?” or, “I haven’t done anything wrong, so why would they need to look at my texts or listen to my phone calls?”, and last but not least, “How is this legal?…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Snowden Fed Up

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks and the creation of the Patriot Act the United States government has been intruding in the personal lives of its’ citizens. The government barges in on large companies like Verizon to obtain personal information from our daily lives. The claim is that this inform ation that the government is collecting is for our safety, but what are they really keeping us safe from if terrorist attacks are still happening, domestic and nondomestic. How does the information of innocent citizens help find or determine future crimes? CitizenFour documents Edward Snowden’s perspective on the NSA spying scandal in which information of the government’s massive covert-surveillance programs was leaked.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (BBC News. Snowden, Jan. 17, 2014). These surveillance issues caused for a public backlash against government surveillance and the NSA. The majority of Americans disapprove of the NSA’s collection of telephone records and more and more people are beginning to be concerned about the country’s lack of civil liberty protection because they don’t believe their liberties should be sacrificed in the name of counter-terrorism. (Civil Liberty in America, Gao, G May 29, 2015).…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The center on law and security (2007) states, “Critics of the NSA program do not necessarily object to the type of surveillance, but rather to the way in which it has been authorized, and to the absence of any oversight”…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas constitutionality of government surveillance is questionable, these laws, along with the countless other sections and statutes in and related to the PATRIOT Act, permit government agencies, under scrutiny, of course, to conduct surveillance to protect our country from terrorist threats and…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After 9/11, surveillance did not become substantively different; it was not an event that pushed our technological capacities forward, but a tragedy that provoked societal change. The topic of surveillance entered mainstream public discussion, with great public concern and support. “The apparent crisis was immediately seen as an opportunity for already existing systems and capacities to be more fully exploited. 9/11 thus brought surveillance to the surface. The existence of a “surveillance society” became much clearer to all.”…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays