Milgram's Experiments On Obedience By Diana Baumrind Analysis

Improved Essays
Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues, …show more content…
As Cari Romm cites from Hollander in her article, " ...Capacity for evil lies dormant in everyone, … The ability to disobey toxic orders is a skill that can be taught like any other." These test subjects could have easily walked out of the room; however, Both Romm and Baumrind implied the subjects seemed clouded by their thoughts and beliefs, they must listen to authoritarian simply because he/she retained more knowledge than the subject. In this experiment, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than Baumrind in arguing with the statement of harming the subject from authority. Parker recognized the obedience spectrum of this claim (Parker 96). Parker implies obedience to authority correlates to how willing humans, in nature, are going listen to authority. As Dr. Stephen Behnke, author of Ethics Rounds: A Classic Study Revisited, states, "… our profession must find a point on that continuum... " (Behnke). As a human in nature, they are more willing to participate in more strenuous situations if the authority is professional in the area of expertise. Although Baumrind felt authority was an issue, she also argued the debriefing process was much too little for the amount of trauma they had been …show more content…
Baumrind argued that after each subject walked out of the experiment Milgram 's approach to reconcile the distraught they had been through was unconvincing (92). Martyn Shuttleworth, author of Milgram Experiment Ethics, often talked how emotionally stressful this experiment was for people. Shuttleworth correlates in her article that there indeed were long term side effects of this taunting experiment (Shuttleworth). While Baumrind implied there should have been a greater amount of a debriefing process, Ian Parker agreed with how the debriefing process occurred (Parker 99). Parker believed that Milgram 's experiments were a breakthrough for Milgram (95). Parker implied that Milgram 's research was a step toward to figuring why people behaved in certain situations. Parker implyingly disagreed with Baumrind simply because the subject could have walked out of the experiment at any point in time; however, they chose not to. Saul McLeod, author of The Milgram Experiment, writes, " Milgram did debrief the participants fully after the experiment and also followed up after a period of time to ensure that they came to no harm." While Baumrind has clear and precise opionions on how Milgram should have run his experiment, Ian Parker effectively made his claims and thoughts more precise and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subjects behavior would have been much different if it was known to them that their authority figure was just an actor. The third regulation violated was the Right to Withdraw. The authority figure in the experiment made it difficult for subjects to withdraw by urging them to continue with the shocks. The fourth guideline violated was Risk, also known as the protection from mental or physical harm. There were many ways in which The Milgram Experiment may have harmed the participants psychologically.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments, for example, were the only one true way of making true findings and it did explore controversial findings. The BPS ‘Code of Human Research Ethics’ also states it should not influence the individuals’ decision to participate. It is important to ensure that participants are deceived as little as possible and that no harm or distress is caused. The true nature of the research should also be revealed in debriefing such as Milgram’s experiment, where he also ensured that the teachers and learners had a reconciliation with each…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind contradicts Stanley Milgram by stating in her article, “It would be interesting to know what sort of procedures could dissipate the type of emotional disturbance” (92 Baumrind).Diana Baumrind believes in her article that if the experiment is not as bad as what Stanley Milgram thinks it is then why does there have to be procedures after the test? If the experiment is not inhumane then why does the psychologist Stanley Milgram need to conduct procedures to make…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She argues that the experiment was affecting the participant even after they were done and had been de-briefed of what the study was actually about, as well as seeing and talking to the ”learner” (the guy who they thought they were electrocuting). Baumrind was also arguing the fact the the experiment had little ecological validity as subjects are more prone to abide in such environments, she also states that participants experienced long-term, negative psychological consequences as a result of their participation in Milgram’s experiment. Milgram had counterpoints for all of her statements, explaining himself and his thought process and why it was necessary towards the experiment. Baumrind says that Milgram 's experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience, his sampling techniques are seldom of a scope which would justify the meaning with which he would like to endow his result, as well as result are hard to reproduce. These combined is considered unethical, as this experiment would never have been accepted by any institutions today.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This Code of Conduct established by the American Psychological Association effectively supports Baumrind by articulating how psychologists should aspire to create trusting relations with people whom they work (“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”). Milgram might refute these criticisms by claiming the subjects could trust the experimenter on the basis that he, the experimenter, was accountable for any harm caused by the subject. Milgram mentions this detail numerous times throughout his narratives of the experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 81, 83). In response to Milgram’s refute, Baumrind would likely debate how Milgram deceived his subjects about the purpose of the experiment. Milgram compelled his subjects to believe that they were not the focal point of the experiment but rather a supplementary aspect (Milgram 78).…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Parker, along with Baumrind, believes the setting of the experiment could drastically alter how the participants react during the experiment. He says “people tend to do things because of where they are, not who they are…” (238). Parker also points out that the participants had no chance for an escape. He cites a psychologist, named Richard Nisbett, who says “there was really no exit, there was no channel for disobedience” (238). This concludes that the experiment may be manipulated therefore the participant has to obey his or her…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical guidelines are crucial in research to minimise unnecessary physical or psychological harm to participants in an experiment. Before ethical guidelines existed in research, several experiments were not conducted ethically. In 1963, American psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted Milgram’s Study of Obedience investigating participants' obedience towards authority. The study demonstrated multiple ethical issues which proved the importance of ethics in research. This report will address the ethical principles that Milgram's study covered poorly and how they could be modified to improve the study.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As I recall from the video, some of the participants did seem to have a little stress due to the aftermath of the experiment, but that’s was nothing that could’ve affected them permanently (Video). It is completely understandable that some participants could’ve been stressed after realizing the true nature of the experiment, but that’s nothing to be considered permanent psychological damage. It is also understandable that some of those participants might’ve become somewhat a little self-conscious after realizing the nature of their acts during the experiment, but that also in my opinion isn’t considered a cause of permanent psychological damage. Conclusion Although the Milgram experiment might’ve be seen as unethical for some people, it can be justified.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s time, the ethics board has made the code of ethics in order that no one would be harmed while in the experiment. This meant both physically and emotionally. The Milgram experiment, as explained earlier in the report, caused stress to arise from the participates with would cause emotional distress. The next code that the board added is that every volunteer would have to sign either a waiver or a consent form that would allow the experimenter to perform the experiment on the volunteer.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays