• Home Page
  • Haag's Arguement Of Capital Punishment In The United States

Haag's Arguement Of Capital Punishment In The United States

Improved Essays
Show More
Throughout history there have been more than fourteen hundred executions in the United States. In the western hemisphere the United States is the only western democracy with capital punishment. Capital punishment is the use of murder as deterrence. In the United States there are thirty-one out of fifty states that have the death penalty. Capital punishment is normally given to bigger crime cases as a way to put an end. There are many concerns and beliefs that people have over when it comes to should capital punishment be allowed. Two philosophers argued their difference on the belief of capital punishment Van Den Haag’s argues that capital punishment should be allowed while Rieman disagrees.
Van Den Haag believes that there are four reasons …show more content…
He also argues how does Van Den Hagg know there is a sign being sent when executing a person. Rieman spends the majority of the time arguing against the points that Van Den Hagg brings up. He believes a message can be sent without having to execute. He also believes that in order to have a civil society people should not execute. But he also states that an assaulter should be beating. Which to Van Den Hagg believe is the same type of punishment that is given to people who kill others.
Both men have very strong arguments on why we should or shouldn’t have capital punishment. For myself I have to say I agree with Van Den Hagg he has strong arguments on why people should be executed. I believe it depends on the crime if we have a serial killer who is being considered for execution I believe he should receive it because he has ended multiple lives and I do not believe that time in jail will help them learn there lesson. However if its a person who just murder one person and the crime wasn’t so serious then maybe this one person should spend sometime in …show more content…
capital punishment should be taken into consideration only for serious crimes and should be used equally. If there are multiple people committing the same crime they should all receive the same punishment not one gets capital punishment and the others get time in jail. When a person is considering using capital punishment they should refer to the points of both Rieman and Van Den Hagg who both proved good points on why it should be used and why it should not be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Van Den Haag's Response To Capital Punishment
    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Van Den Haag's Response To Capital Punishment

    Van den Haag’s response was that the distribution of the death penalty does not change its morality. ”no distribution cannot affect the quality of what is distributed.” If the death penalty was misdistributed then it would “actually favor African American murders over white murders, because the misdistribution Is explain by the race of the victim, and murders tend to kill people that are the same race as them.” Misdistribution is irrelevant when it come to those who deserve it. People that deserve the punishment will get it because it is not about equality it is about justice being served.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Analysis Of Frederick Douglas's Views On Capital Punishment
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Analysis Of Frederick Douglas's Views On Capital Punishment

    While I do agree with punishment and reform, so that the criminal is aware of the damage caused by his/her actions. I do not agree with capital punishment, because nothing is resolve.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Edward I. Koch's Arguments Against The Death Penalty
    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Edward I. Koch's Arguments Against The Death Penalty

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    David Von Drehle's The Death Of The Death Penalty
    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages

    David Von Drehle's The Death Of The Death Penalty

    Ernest van den Haag didn’t use a large amount of evidence to support his opinion, instead, he used a lot more common sense and moral and non-moral purpose of death penalty to explain why capital punishment should not be abolished in the United States. Surprisingly, Ernest van den Haag didn’t use any sources or research findings to serve as evidence, instead, he liked to explain his perspective by simply saying it. An example of this can be found in his third point, where he points out that according to some research data, death penalty is the most deterrent punishment available in the society without citing any sources. Besides the evidence and sources utilization, his logic is clear and well maintained throughout the paper. He gives several real life example to demonstrate his point on the death penalty problem, the case and effect relation is clear and solid.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty, By Ernest Van Den Haag
    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Death Penalty, By Ernest Van Den Haag

    Haag also talks about special cases, such as the potential to kill while in jail. What else do these inmates have to lose? I think this is when the death penalty can be used. Bedau argues that the death penalty is immoral and barbaric in this civil society.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Lethal Injection Research Paper
    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lethal Injection Research Paper

    I feel that if we do implement a universal system for capital punishment then we can reduce crime rates for horrible crimes such as serial murders and serial rape. This system would act as a deterrent for anyone thinking of committing this act more than the current option of jailing them for life would be. I also feel that if we have any chance to spare any victims of these crimes we should take it and deter those who will react to this system of punishment. Blecker, an advocate for the death penalty, feels that life in prison ends up being a punish for criminals who committed crimes much lesser than a murder or a rape. He also feels that we shouldn't use the lethal injection as an execution method.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Philosopher Van Den Haag's In Defense Of The Death Penalty
    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Philosopher Van Den Haag's In Defense Of The Death Penalty

    He takes on the position of pro-capital punishment and argues his position in his article “In Defense of the Death Penalty”. Haag presents us two choices in regard to deterrence. The first choice he presents is that to trade the life of a convicted murderer and save the 7-8 innocent victims whose murder is probable unless that murderer is executed. The second choice is to allow the murderer to live and possibly lose the 7-8 innocent people who the murderer can possibly kill. Most of us would choose the first choice and Haag agrees.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Capital Punishment And Death Penalty
    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Capital Punishment And Death Penalty

    Capital punishment is Immoral and has a hypocritical nature. Capital punishment has failed to deter crime. There is a superior, more compassionate and cheaper alternative. Capital Punishment is immoral and hypocritical. Capital punishment comes in numerous sorts like torture, electric chair, gas chambers, sawing, etc.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag A Defense Of Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ernest Van Den Haag A Defense Of Capital Punishment Analysis

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Racial Bias In The Criminal Justice System
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Racial Bias In The Criminal Justice System

    But as researchers, we can determine that we still will always have capital punishment because individuals believe some people deserve that sentence. As much knowledge about capital punishment that we have read about and its beliefs and historical past we can see the flaws. As researchers, we would like to see the difference in giving less capital punishment and giving life in prison without parole. Therefore, maybe this philosophy will change a criminal mind before he acts. Maybe this could stop individual’s from committing murder remember life in prison…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Nathanson's Argument Against Capital Punishment

    In this paper, I will discuss Nathansons argument against capital punishment. I will discuss how Nathanson has responses to Haags arguments with two cases. I argue that Haag has good responses but I would agree with Nathanson to say that one must treat everyone the same depending on their crimes without treating each criminal differently even though they have committed the same crime but are not getting the same punishment. Haag’s primary objection in capital punishment was that it does not matter if the death penalty is administered arbitrarily because individual punishments depend on individual quilt alone, and whether punishments are distributed equally among the class of guilty persons does not matter.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag Death Penalty Analysis
    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ernest Van Den Haag Death Penalty Analysis

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Arguments Against Capital Punishment
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States Arguments Against Capital Punishment

    Capital punishment has always been a subject that people normally do not like to talk about because people, especially the government, knows that capital punishment is an unconstitutional cruel and unusual idea. Capital punishment should be used by states to execute a prisoner, given that the evidence that is against them is substantial enough and beyond a doubt calls for a death sentence. Even though capital punishment is rare and slowly decreasing (Source A), the fact that it continues to exist is the general problem with it. Capital punishment itself would go against the 8th Amendment, saying that “…cruel and unusual punishments [would not be] inflicted” and the fact that the American government would overlook this very clear part of the Constitution is very worrisome because they could do this with many other Amendments. In my opinion, capital punishment is unjustified in every way and should not exist because the best substitute for capital punishment is lifetime in prison provided with rehabilitation options for the guiltily…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ernest Van Den Haag Capital Punishment Analysis

    Van Den Haag argues in defense of the death penalty (Van Den Haag 325). His first defense is against claims that the penalty is not distributed equally (Van Den Haag 326). To answer this objection, he says that the maldistribution of justice does not make the punishment itself immoral. The death penalty itself is just while its distribution is not always fair. He then claims that even those who show statistics to prove racist faults in the distribution of capital punishment fail to present an argument that would warrant abolishing the penalty, since justice is…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory, And Ethical Theories Of Capital Punishment
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory, And Ethical Theories Of Capital Punishment

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. " Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings