Aquinas Questions On The Soul Analysis

Great Essays
Focusing on Question One of Aquinas’ Questions on the Soul, explain what it means to Aquinas for the soul to be both form and entity. Present Aquinas’ argumentation for the position, and briefly indicate whether you find the arguments convincing or not, and your reasons.

From the very fact that Aquinas begins his Questions on the Soul with the question of whether the soul is both a form and entity, we are perhaps already introduced to the significance of this position for the defence of his specific notion of the human soul. Despite this, such a position does not appear an easy one to defend. Taken in its broadest sense, if the soul thought to be an entity, and hence a substantial and complete being in its own right, how may it possibly
…show more content…
Whilst its operation, granted, can have no bodily organ from which is specifically operates, for reasons already granted, it presides necessary, however, for the body to have access to the material sensing capacities of the body, such that it may acquire those intelligible species necessary for any operation of the intellect, and ultimately knowledge of the immortal (Aquinas, 1984, p.48). This is so as the soul operates, and works toward knowledge of universals via “abstracting species, not only from matter but also from all individuating, material conditions, and these operations are required for knowing a universal” (Aquinas, 1984, p.46) and in this regard, the soul is “constituted on the boundary line between corporeal and separate substances” (Aquinas, 1985, p.48). This follows as, whilst it persists as an intellectual substance, it presides as the lowest of such, since “a human soul does not possess innate intelligible species by means of which it can accomplish its essential operation” (Aquinas, 1984, p.115) like the higher of these intellectual substances. It hence requires a unity with what is said to be the highest of material bodies, such that it may gain access to “intelligible species from things outside itself through the mediation of sense powers, which cannot accomplish their appropriate operation without bodily organs” (Aquinas, 1984, p.115). Hence, all immaterial knowledge of the soul, by these means, is derived from knowledge attained from the sensing of material things alone (Aquinas, 1984, p.48). So, “insofar as a soul by nature acquires its immaterial knowledge from what is material, it is clear that the fullness of it nature cannot be achieved apart from union with a body” (Aquinas, 1984,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This relationship between philosophy and theology stood out drastically to how Christianity had been viewed previously because Aquinas wanted to find a way to connect Catholicism and faith with Aristotle and knowledge. One major argument in Thomas Aquinas’ “Summa Contra Gentiles that Aquinas has relating to faith and reason is that everyone is born with innate reason so everyone has the capacity to have faith. In order to unpack this assertion, one must understand how Aquinas defines faith and reason. Aquinas believes that human reason is limited and that some things transcend the power of human reason,…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aquinas Vs Kant

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages

    However, God and other simple substances that contain the truest and most perfect form of essence cannot be observed by the sense, and therefore, one must turn to the essence of composite substances. In On Being and Essence, Aquinas discusses the essence of composite substances. He claims that the essence in composite substance “comprises both matter and form” (Aquinas, II). In other words, essence is a purposeful combination of form and matter that is essential to the…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Letters to Herodotus, Epicurus’ material outlook assumes that all things are made out of atoms, an argument that he extends to the soul. He raises the point that the soul is material and capable of sensation, and these sensations build out thoughts; however, this assumption tends to categorize human thoughts and limit originality and creativity. In the text, Epicurus explains that the soul is a structure that is material and primarily used for sensation; these sensations become responsible for our thoughts and reason. The soul’s relationship to the body is important in this respect.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that the soul itself is one entity that ultimately has several characteristics, including but not only, rational thought, appetite and…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This previous quotation not only prove the immortality of the soul, is also proves that the soul and the body are separate. Since the soul waits for the cycle of the body, it shows that they are…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    For in Plato’s Phaedo, the soul is understood to merely be harbored in the body for a brief period. According to the Argument from the Form of Life, the soul, as being what gives life to a body, is the form of life thereby and cannot admit the opposite form, which is death (Plato 105D). Hence, the soul is indeed deathless (Plato 105E). We can see that the establishment of a kind of dualism motivates this argument. The soul is successful characterized as completely distinct and separate from the body.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within every person, there is an immortal soul. Immortal meaning that after death the soul continues to live on. During the paper, I will explain Plato’s view towards the immortality of the soul, which argument of Plato’s is the strongest to defending his claim, then I will talk about three arguments as to why I believe there is an immortal soul within each human being. Finally, I will look back at Plato’s strongest argument from the first section and give my personal take on his belief as to why we have an immortal soul.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes leaves many weak spots in his argument, Searle chooses probably the most difficult position to articulate. Searle attempts to explain why Descartes’ argument of mind-body distinction is not really an argument at all and that the two traditional default positions of the argument, materialism and dualism, are not accurate representations as to what the real problem is and should be discarded. Searle’s purpose is to destroy any remaining idea of Cartesian dualism and introduce a much better way of thinking about how humans are, a refutation of the default positions and a transition to a more comprehensive view on the…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critique logic of Aristotle understands of the nature(s) of the human soul. According to Aristotle, human nature refers to the unique characteristics in a human being. Some of these characteristics include the way of thinking, feeling and acting. These characteristics are in human beings, and they occur naturally, independently of the influence of culture.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays