Essay On Misjudgments In King Lear

Improved Essays
Morals contribute to the process of thinking and committing actions. After 1600, Shakespeare wrote tragedies that “present vivid impressions of human temperament that are timeless and universal”(William Shakespeare Biography). Looking from a moral criticism perspective, Shakespeare 's King Lear breaks many morals that today’s society values, such as a family’s love. King Lear, the retiring king, corrupts his family love by hosting a contest on which daughter loves him the most. This contest will decide who gets which part of his kingdom. Goneril and Regan, his eldest daughters, confirm their love for him. Cordelia, his youngest, believes actions speak louder than words,so refuses to express her love for him, which infuriates him. Breaking these valued morals lead to madness that encompasses the characters’ minds and “eliminates all rational thoughts” (Bali). In Shakespeare’s King Lear, blindness results in misjudgments, leaving the person to decide to either change for the better or allow greed to overrule.
As the play progresses, the characters’ actions portray how misjudgments influence them to choose a destructive path. Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester, Regan, and Goneril, the daughters of King Lear, use these misjudgments for their personal self gain. Edmund desires
…show more content…
His son, Edmund, plots to steal his power and land from him. Gloucester 's blindness leads him to disowning his other son, Edgar, and believing he has “ grown so vile/ That it doth hate what gets it” (3.4.134-136). Realizing similarity between his and King Lear’s situation, Gloucester believes disowning this rebellious child, Edgar, will benefit him. Consequently, favoring Edmund, Gloucester is led down a dangerous path. His “[i]initial response to suffering and misfortune is despair and defeat” (Storozynsky). “Desiring only death” (Storozynsky), he feels defeated from mistakes he has made as a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    King Lear and Waiting for Godot are plays that are very similar in a way that they have the same central concern of recognition within the plays. There are many different ways that the issue of recognition is shown; there is self-recognition, recognition by others and recognition of actions. Whilst these plays differ from each other in almost every other way, they do share this central concern. Recognition means the acknowledgement of the existence, validity or legality of something.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Demonstrated in Act 1 Scene 1 when his youngest yet sweetest daughter (Cordelia) says: “I cannot heave my heart into my mouth” in response to King Lear’s demand for adoration. As a result, King Lear’s inability to recognise her love chooses to banish her and anyone who opposes his decision, emphasising that his pride has distorted his judgements. On top of this, King Lear’s distorted judgements are reiterated when he imperatively commands his loyal subsidiary to get “Out of my sight!”. This supports the statement that King Lear’s pride has affected his decision-making as he banishes his most loyal subsidiary after warning him to not disown Cordelia. Furthermore, in the sub-plot of “King Lear” scenes of pride are demonstrated when the earl of Lear called Gloucester, is approached by his bastard son with a forged letter supposedly composed by his innocent elder son.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human beings too often avert their eyes from suffering. We choose to avoid our afflictions in an attempt to deny the necessary evils within humanity. By not confronting the truths surrounding the worst in us, however, we become ignorant of a vital and possibly beneficial aspect of human nature. Both Dante’s Inferno and Shakespeare’s King Lear seek to bring attention to human suffering, illustrating our griefs and sorrows as consequences of our own agency. This pain that we cause ourselves can be handled in different ways that further define human suffering; each narrative profoundly explores both approaches, as Dante and Shakespeare portray suffering not only as a method of further inflicting pain on ourselves, but also as an opportunity…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is shown through his deceptive and revenge fuel’d temper to gain authority over his “family”. Shakespear shows this through the use of repetition to emphasize his wrath in Edmunds soliloquy: “ Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land. / Our father’s love is to the bastard Edmund / As to the legitimate.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Lear is played by his own two daughters who plot against him secretly. Gloucester A loyal man to King Lear also has several injustices done to him by his son Edmund. Edmund has a plan to ruin his fathers reputation inheriting his land and power. The driving force of this play is injustice. This leads to the development of the tragic tone of the play and identity of the characters.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manipulation In King Lear

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As previously mentioned Edgar is the legitimate son of Gloucester and is to inherit his father's fortune before he fell victim to Edmunds manipulation. Although Edgar's story seems to be sympathetic and tragic it is truly just a direct result of Edgar's own foolishness. Throughout Edmunds manipulation of his brother Edgar, Edgar arrogantly never questions the legitimacy of his brothers claims. For example, when Edmund first manipulated Edgar, he convinced his brother that their father Gloucester was so enraged by him that he wanted to harm him. Being that Edgar does not recall doing anything to enrage his father, it would be logical that Edgar would be skeptical of his brother claims and even seek to resolve the issue.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Edgar is his beloved legitimate son, and Edmund is his illegitimate child: “But I have a son, sir, by order of the law, some year elder than this, who is yet no dearer in my account. Though this knave came saucily to the world, before he was sent for, yet was his mother fair, there was good sport at his making, and the whoreson must be acknowledged” (I.1.19-24).This predefined outline of the relationship between father and son greatly troubles Edmund. Edmund believes that he should be viewed as an equal, or even superior to Edgar in the eyes of his father. However, due to his status of being born out of wedlock, prevents him from being viewed as an equal. This discrepancy in status inspires Edmund to conspire against his brother: “Let me, if not by birth, have lands by wit with all with me’s meet that I can fashion fit” (I.2.191-192).…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His personality discards his ability to see the goodness in Edgar, and the evil in Edmund. Although Edgar was an attentive and loving son, Gloucester decides to disown him. Gloucester begins to perceive Edgar as not trustful son, this appearance of Edgar commences when Edmund persuades him with a forged letter that states Edgar is plotting to kill him, "I beseech you, sir, pardon me: it is a letter from my brother, that I have not all o 'er-read; and for so much as I have perused, I find it not fit for your o 'er-looking" (Act 1, Scene 2.38-41). Gloucester 's lack of knowledge of reality restricts him from pondering the idea of Edmund being after his earldom. Near the end of the play, Gloucester gets back into reality and realizes that Edgar saved his life, disguised as Poor Tom, and loved him all along.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I want to focus the play around these central relationships, it’s important to note that, in this tragedy, Shakespeare included a parallel plot: the story of Edgar, ‘sonne and heire to the Earle of Gloster, and his sullen and assumed humor of Tom of Bedlam’ (from the title page of the 1608 quarto of King Lear, quoted in Shapiro, 2015). What’s interesting to me is Shapiro’s interpretation of this subplot as a counterpoint to the story of Lear’s family, “a way to highlight Lear’s figurative blindness by juxtaposing it with something more literal” (Shapiro, 2015). Edgar’s…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The deceit from Goneril and Regan are no help to anyone, including themselves. They both turn their backs on their family and betray their father’s trust. Both are willing to hurt and/or kill anyone to get power, all with disregard to family. Their cruelty is unacceptable and it shows that they care very little for their father and only care about getting more power. Lear feels like he has no home because his two eldest daughters have exiled him from their homes.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Lear William Shakespeare’s King Lear has many characters that are that are driven by their wants and desires. That drive can either make them or break them. One character in particular is broken by his drive to become powerful and gain recognition. Edmund, the illegitimate son of Gloucester, has always been overshadowed by the fact that he was born out of wedlock and his brother, Edgar, was not. That prevented Edmund from not getting certain things like becoming king like his brother could achieve.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Prescott 25 March 2018 Growth through self-knowledge In King Lear, Shakespeare stresses the importance of self-knowledge and forgiveness. King Lear is a character who lacks self knowledge. However, he begins to learn how the quality is important as he endures through hardships. Lear’s life breaks down slowly after banishing the only daughter who loved him dearly. Lear gives most of his kingship to daughters who are disloyal and care less for his wellbeing.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is shown through the use of verse and hyperbole of “I love you more than word can wield the matter” where the greed for land is what drives Goneril to say nice words.. However, the irony of lear failing to differentiate authenticity or deception of love results in misjudging Cordelia for feigned love, instigating social, personal and self-conflicts for both lear, his daughters and the society. This plot drive will not only foreshadow complications but also result in the sacrifice of Cordelia and Gloucester. Shakespeare’s use of epiphany of Lear, is shown by misperceiving Goneril’s love with flattery which is portrayed through Goneril’s plosive language, contrasting the poetic language in verse present in the division of the kingdom, exemplifying Goneril’s greed for land the deceptive love expressed for Lear. This parallels with the double plot of Gloucester…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-knowledge or “understanding of oneself, one 's character, abilities or, motives” is seen in Shakespeare’s King Lear (dictionary.com). Both King Lear and Gloucester place their trust in the wrong child, and it ultimately leads to their downfall. Both Cordelia who is the daughter of King Lear, and Kent who is a nobleman under Gloucester remain true to themselves and retain self-knowledge. Cordelia and Kent continuously speak the truth and fight to remain honest and loyal even though it bodes serious consequences for them and their companions. Cordelia is a voice of reason to father King Lear, and her sisters Regan and Goniril.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Lear Subplot Essay

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the rivetingly tragic play "King Lear" by Shakespeare, there is a sizable amount of themes that ricochets between the subplot and main plot. In an attempt to universalize the travesties endured by the protagonist and tragic hero, Shakespeare incorporates a significant subplot into King Lear. Although the focus clearly lies on the tragic plight of King Lear, the secondary plot involving Gloucester and his offspring mirrors and dramatizes Lear's hopeless situation. Both Lear and Gloucester misjudge their offspring and respond rashly to inaccurate information; the subsequent rejection of those closest to them leads to a chaotic sequence of irreversible events. The characters that purposefully instigate the inevitable downfall of both Lear and…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays