The Three Concepts Of The Realist International Relations Theory

Great Essays
Introduction
The aim of this essay is to identify and critique two principles of the realist international relations theory. Having this purpose in mind, this essay will focus on two of the most fundamental concepts of the realist school of thought: power and state centrism. The first part of this essay will discuss the concept of power, its place within the realist theory and its limitations. From the beginning, this essay establish an appropriate language for addressing this concept. Consequently, I will make reference to “hard power” when talking about realists’ conception of power, this being the most appropriate term for summarise their ideas. This part will identify power as one of the core principles and assumptions of realism that has been discussed and debated since the begging of realism through
…show more content…
However, realists’ choice to focus almost exclusively on the hard dimension of power poses serious limitations to their attempt to have a comprehensive understanding of power within the international relations field of study. The second part of this essay will focus on state centrism, the main approach and unit of analysis for realists. States are viewed the main actors on the international scene, rule-makers in anarchy and the only actors whose actions and decisions is worth analysing. However, by having this exclusivist approach, realists fail to understand the increasing importance of non-state actors, being them international institutions made for cooperation or terrorist organisation posing threats for nation-states as well as the current process of global integration that undermines, to a certain extent the sovereignty of nation-states. Having analysed and criticised the two concepts, this essay will conclude that, while realism remains one of the most influential theories of international relations serving the purposes for which it was created, this theory falls short on several aspects in trying to explain modern-day developments in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jervis argues that four possible world orders may arise out of this unique scenario: a world in which national autonomy is diminished and barriers between states disintegrate, a world in which there is more cooperation between states, yet states retain national autonomy, a world in which the United States dominates and acts freely, and a world in which a “counter-balancing coalition” is created to offset the U.S.’s power (Jervis). These four orders represent a significant departure from “traditional” international politics in that the theory that “leading powers always struggle for dominance for gain, status, or security, and are willing to use force to this end” no longer applies (Jervis). To summarize, states no longer have to worry about a fully anarchic world where they must rely on self-help, as Realists would argue.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning of her speech, the audience can grasp that Ambassador Power’s perspective on international relations is primarily based on a liberalist point of view. Prior to even discussing about the threat that Russia is imposing to the United States, Ambassador Power begins her speech by stressing the fact that “some of the most rewarding and impactful work [she] has done at the UN has come in the times when [her] Russian counterpart and [her] have been able to cooperate.” This statement demonstrates that she agrees with the fact that cooperation is what leads state to attain their security; it is congruent with Scott Silverstone’s perspective on the liberal tradition. As the paper progresses, Ambassador Power’s remarks continue to fall in line with the liberal assumption that cooperation guarantees security and guides a state to attain their self-interest. For example, she states that in order to confront Russia’s attempt to divide the nations, the nation must confront the threat together by adapting and strengthening the orders to which their interests depend.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus emerging actors will seek a ‘balance of power’ within the current system. That, “balancing involves institutional strategies such as the formation of limited diplomatic coalitions or ententes to constrain the superior powers. It also involves strengthening economic ties between peers, which can possibly shift the balance of economic power against the more powerful state/s in the long term.” (Flemes, 6)…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, politics does or should deal with all elements, as Morgenthau himself believes that “real man is a composite of economic man, political man, moral man, etc” (1993,17). There are many aspects to man, and thus power cannot be the sole tool to analyze international behaviour. Morgenthaus’ over emphasis of the concept ‘interest defined in terms of power’ consequently blurs out other factors that affect and determine the use of national power. No single cause can explain political phenomena. The concept of power does not allow one to wholly understand or analyze pertinent factors of foreign policy, such as a nation’s’ impetus for war, that underlie political phenomena.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before divulging into whither power is an asset it is important to establish and define what United States primacy is. The definition of primacy is, “the state of being most important or strongest.” In this analysis, U.S. primacy refers to being the only power in modern history to establish a lead in almost every important dimension of power. America has the world’s largest economy, military advantage, and ideological influences. Combined with its geopolitical position, the U.S. has the type of power unseen in the world’s history.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After learning about the broad concepts of foreign policy and the specifics of American history from the 1800s to the present day, I believe that the scope or arc of the policy has been progressive and interrelated. Foreign policy builds off the past mistakes and successes this has led to a transformation from isolationism to engagement. Power can be seen as a driving force in the change in the U.S’s approach to international relations and as a main method of foreign involvement. Manifest Destiny and the Monroe Doctrine are two early examples of this shift to engagement. Acquiring possession of land and other nations puts the U.S into the concerns of other nations.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, America’s involvement in Iraq, 2003 has led to a decline in their soft power and as a result, it can be argued by Cox’s realist perception that the US is no longer a significant power within the world as other nations such as China…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although Booth also explores this theme at the start of his article, his analogy of this traditional approach is rather disparate. Booth assumes that prior to the end of the Cold War, the main concern of security studies was based and focused on inter-state war and the deployment of weapons . Similar to the argument of Walt, Booth states that traditional security has been characterized by the three elements of military threats and counter threats, status quo, and state centrism . Consequently, Booth shifts and differs immensely from Walt, with a much more reasonable and relevant argument. Booth believes that although this was a well-focused part of the study of security, ever since the Cold-War has ended, the modern era has seen the decline in inter-state war, and the fact that will only fight if they or…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A definition details power as the “ability and capacity to force, coerce, or persuade others to do what they would not otherwise do” (Zook). In President Obama’s terms, he entails a more specific version, emphasizing the importance of “giving up some freedom of action” to follow international rules as well as “welcom[ing] scrutiny of our own actions”; he describes power as a tool that gives countries credibility, reliability, and reputation instead of the exertion of brute strength, although physical strength is still a necessary aspect of a powerful country. Obama simply defers the focus away from physical prowess to a different definition of a diminished importance of arms and weapons. He gives the example of Russia, describing how its meddling nature toward its neighboring countries merely serves to lower its presence, diminishing its power, and also decreases the security of the nation, emphasizing how it essentially receives losses for its actions. But from a Realist perspective, Obama’s definition of power simply undermines a nation’s stature in international affairs.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Olga Gonzalez Professor Meyer Pol Sci 7 03 May, 2017 A Realist View on the Refugee Crisis The Syrian refugee crisis has lead to a worldwide issue that cannot be ignored by the most powerful nations of this world. Yet, the world refuses to deal with the refugee crisis since it can potentially change the ideals, values, and image that each superpower portrays to themselves and the globe. A traditional way to look at it is using an open analysis of the realist theory in international relations. A key factor to the realist theory is to safeguard security in ones home nation.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Khaliun Munkhuu The New Interventionism In the article, David C. Hendrickson argues American international policy has taken completely different and “counterproductive” approach to a notion of external intervention in hopes of promoting democracy by ignoring an old wisdom which opposed such inclination to intervene in countries where there are conflicts both within a state and among states. His acceptance of ongoing conflicts in international relations and his opposing stance against liberalists idea that intervention which is another form of cooperation leads to peace suggests that he is a realist scholar who believes that war is in human nature and, therefore, there is no room for cooperation in international relations.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is one of the most important concepts in the social sciences. The meaning of the word discussed and developed by many people such as academics and philosophers. Steven Luke is a political and social theorist. He defined the meaning of power that “ A exercises power over B when A affects in a manner contrary to B’s interests (Luke, S. 1974:30)”. Since the definition is too common, he defines powers in his own terminology, which says three dimensions power which are the one-dimensional view of power, the second-dimensional view of power and the three-dimensional view of power.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays