Descartes New Concept Of Self As A Thinking Person Analysis

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… All of the features of the wax such as its smell, taste, sight, and touch that he acquired through the senses are nonexistent after the wax has melted. Our senses would tell us that after the wax had melted it was no longer the same wax. Though after the wax has melted and everything the wax was (its color, taste, and smell) is taken away, there is still left the thought of the wax. However, our intellect, our only certain faculty of reasoning and understanding would tell us that it was the same piece of wax. We know that it is the same piece of wax after it has melted but the flame has caused it to appear differently. If the solid and melted piece of wax are the same, how does the intellect know this? Descartes concluded that his ability to understand the wax was not only through the senses acquired by the physical body but also by the reasoning and understanding of his own intellect. In order to determine what is certain, all previous knowledge and beliefs must be doubted. By doubting everything, the senses acquired by the physical body become unreliable and all is left is the reliable nature of thought and intellect. In order for those things in which we become aware of through the senses to have meaning there must be thoughts. The certain belief that thoughts do exist allows for the establishment of a self, the faculty of intellect and thought. The self, the faculty of thought is distinguishable from all other things in that it cannot be …show more content…
According to Buddhism, to say that there is a self is to say that there is one part of a person that can control the different parts and that there is one part that can account for the identity of a person over time. Overall, to say that there is a self is to say that there is some part of a person that is necessary in order for that person to exist. This one necessary part would therefore be what “I” is named in Descartes mediations. The different parts of a person are called the skandhas and include corporeality, feeling, perception, mental forces, and consciousness. Buddhism states that there is no more to a person than these five elements, and it is only with all five elements that a person can form. There are two reasons as to why the skandhas are not the self, one being that they are impermanent and the other being that they are not under any sort of control. For instance, the physical body does not last forever and when the body dies, it disintegrates. The body’ impermanence shows that it is not a self. In regards to the skandha of perception, it is a simple mental event and sensory content to the mind, like the smell of bees wax. Our perceptions cannot be controlled nor do our perceptions remain the same over time, therefore perception is not the self (Siderits

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The intellect connects the solid wax with the melted wax— that is, the intellect organizes the information which allows us to understand such an occurrence. In contrast, the senses tell…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will provide an analysis for one of the celebrated arguments by Descartes written in the Meditations. The challenging argument presented by Descartes is the argument from ignorance, which is precisely claimed in his First Meditation. Moreover, the skeptical argument requires for one to know that the present external world is not a dream in order to have knowledge that an external world exists. Otherwise, one does not really know that an external world exists. As noted, this argument of logical possibility presents difficulties when attempting to provide a satisfactory answer to avoid the questioning of the entailment of what one knows.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Rene Descartes a) Rene Descartes believes that things exist simply because he thinks, therefore he is. This is beautifully illustrated when he gives us the wax example. Before giving that example, Rene Descartes did state that our senses are deceptive and so is our imagination. If we were to go by that, does that mean we exist just because we perceive it through our senses?…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the world you lived in wasn’t real, how would you know? In this paper, I will be discussing Descartes’s line of reasoning while attempt to prove the uncertainty of many ordinary beliefs using his universal or Cartesian doubt, in Descartes’s book Meditations on First Philosophy. Dubbed the “Father of Modern Philosophy”, Descartes was a philosopher in Sweden who taught others philosophy, and was also a huge advocate for mathematics, specifically geometry. He doubts everything that his senses inform his of, and even the reasoning procedure, because he wants to conquer skepticism. He knows, however, that he is real because he has the ability to think.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the wax example, Descartes not only shows that perceiving object is considered a node of thinking, but also represent that we can understand an idea through a pure understanding, which is mind rather than sensory experience. The wax significantly suggests that pure understanding is clearer than sensory experience (Descartes, 1996, p20-p21). In the other hand. Locke emphasizes that we understand ideas through primarily using reason which comes from our sensory experience (Locke, 2008, p19). The difference between the two explanations about obtaining true knowledge leads me to think that sensory experiences can be mistaken and as the result, they may cause different people to develop different interpretation on the same idea.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea coincides with the view that each person is a singular mental thing, such as a soul or spirit, this is called the Cartesian view. This is completely different to the previous two theories that say there is several selves (James) or no self (bundle). However one element that Ego and bundle share is that the self is determined by or made up of our experiences and emotions, conflicting with James theory which states the self is more…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We would not know whether there is a soul in the body or not. However, Descartes, through the second meditation, has demonstrated that the wax is recognized not through the senses or imagination but the mind alone. And in meditation four he uses god as a foundation to prove that material objects exists. Saying that God is no deceiver and therefore objects that God create - the world, would never deceive.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The beginning of understanding oneself starts with identity. For centuries, philosophers have contemplated a common issue known as the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem is a philosophical problem that asks the question of what we as people are. Are people a mind, a body, or a combination of the two? There are several major works that pertain to this problem, but this argument will focus on those given by Gilbert Ryle, Rene Descartes, and Richard Taylor.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics