Defining and Decreasing Poverty Within the U.S. Essays

1818 Words 8 Pages
How poverty is defined in America is outdated and simply hurts poor families and how the government helps to provide for them. Due to the overall success and the median income of those in America comparatively to the globe, only a very small portion is defined as living in absolute poverty (not meeting very basics). As stated in class “most poor people have cars, homes, & consumer goods.” One chart that shows the ownership of specific goods demonstrates that 73.4% of the poor have an automobile, 91.3% have any type of phone, and even 79.7% have an air conditioner. This claim makes America sound like poverty is not much of a problem, but the dilemma is that in reality the gap between the richest and poorest is steadily widening. How our …show more content…
Not only is it more expensive to live comfortably in America, but the established Poverty Threshold (defines how much a family must make to meet basic necessities) has been proven to be far lower than acceptable. The 1963 Department of Agriculture’s calculation that a 1/3 of a family’s budget is put towards food is grossly outdated and it is now predicted that only 1/5 of a family’s budget is put fourth towards food. Farming and processing advancements in the production of food have made it cost less, but many living necessities have simply arisen since the 60’s. Eating as a whole has become less expensive, but other basics are attributed to this very bold fluctuation, and families are not able to facilitate them. A statistic shows that in most age groups, both girls and boys above and below the Poverty Threshold were able to obtain the appropriate amount of daily recommended nutrition. As stated before, poor people still choose to have basic living items such as household appliances, cars and phones, but being in the modern society, these types of expenses were not accounted for back in the 60’s, and the American people are using the government as a crutch continuously to live.

The adjustment of this law to fit current economic trends “1/5 of total income being contributed to food” would obviously increase the amount of recipients,

Related Documents