The shortcoming of the perspective of European diplomacy was to how to resolve the empire in such a conduct that no one power would enjoy an advantage at the cost of the others and which shakeup the political equilibrium of Europe (Kedourie, 1968). By the end of 18th century the condition of the Ottoman empire was terrible. Almost all the Pachas of Aisa were no more bound to Sultan apart from some tributes and accolades of grace. The Persians and the Kurds threatened the eastern frontiers; the Mamelukes oppressed Egypt, Syria was in open rebellion and the people of Turkey in Europe seemed to be no finer subjected than those of Asia. The anarchism was so much that the bands of robbers were established in Balkans, Rhodope and Pindus, which resorted and devastated all provinces. Among those bands one was imposed a hefty contribution upon the other city of the empire, that is, Adrianople (Kedourie, …show more content…
In the late 1990s the press marked Germany with this term due to its monetary issues, particularly because of the expenses of German reunification after 1990, which were assessed to add up to over €1.5 trillion (explanation of Freie Universität Berlin). It kept on being utilized as a part of the mid 2000s, and as Germany slipped into retreat in 2003. In May 2005, The Economist credited this title to Italy, depicting it as "the genuine sick man of Europe." This alludes to Italy 's auxiliary and political troubles thought to hinder financial changes to relaunch monetary growth. In 2008, The Daily Telegraph additionally utilized the term to portray Italy. The expression "sick man of Europe" was connected to Russia in the book Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin 's Russia and the End of Revolution by Peter Baker and Susan Glasser, and by Mark Steyn in his 2006 book America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It. In 2007, The Economist depicted Portugal as "another sick man of Europe" (Shaw & Shaw,