Importance Of Human Dignity

Decent Essays
Human dignity is a fundamental characteristic when discussing capital punishment. Every human being possess equal dignity that must be respected and not violated. Capital punishment is basically dehumanising. Disregarding all human characteristic and the human ethics and foundations which shape a human being violating and paying no attention to human dignity. Primarily taking a human’s life as a form of penalty and retribution is always in the wrong because nothing good comes from taking a human beings life. When a human being supports and inflicts capital punishment misinterpreting what it means to be human ignoring the nature and truth of human dignity. It Is important to take into account that every human being possess human dignity which …show more content…
Crimes committed by humans leads to the violation of human dignity with the offender not treating the victim as a human instead treating the human being like an object overlooking and dismissing the dignity of the human being. Using capital punishment as a form of retribution only inflicts suffering, torture and distress. Capital punishment is an unlawful decision which only dehumanises its victims. It is important that if a penalty is applied for the unlawful act it is essential that the punishment is not dehumanising making sure it dose not ignore the fundamental of human dignity that every person obtains. It is imperative to come to terms with the inviolability of life no matter how bad the crime committed is by the offender it is essential to take justify that the offender holds human dignity and it must not be ignored because it demoralises human dignity which is an innate characteristic which is given to every human being. Punishment should be used if necessary to communicate to the offender of the crime that what they did was wrong in order to teach a lesson. Even though punishment upsets and injures the offender it should not have a long lasting effect it should not lead to capital punishment because it only violates the human rights and dignity of the human being. Punishment is used to teach a lesson not to take a human beings …show more content…
Conley proclaiming that any form of capital punishment is immoral overlooking the human form. Inherent dignity focuses on the equal value and worth of every human being indicating that every human being has innate inherent dignity which was inherited since the day of birth and remains till the time of death. Every human being should be aware that every human being posses inherent dignity being apart of the human species belonging to the human family. Every human being should live a life that respects human inherent dignity coming to terms with the morality of human rights. The inherent dignity of a human being is everlasting and never ending. Conley pointing out that any form of capital punishment is corrupt and impure which strays away from humanity itself creating a false idea that leads human beings to believe that inherent dignity no longer exists. No matter how bad the crime committed by the offender is using capital punishment is never the answer because it is a shameful inhuman act which neglects humanity and the human beings inherent dignity. Conley making clear that when another human being sentences a human to death they deny the inherent dignity of the human being. Permitting the person sentencing the offender of the crime to make the judgement with a clear mind leading the human being to commit a undignified act

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Due to this, capital punishment has caused people all over the world to change their beliefs about what charge men who have done heinous crime should be given. Capital Punishment is not right because when chosen, the lives…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Necessary measures need to be taken. Capital punishment is the execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense (Hood). Since the beginning of human civilization, punishments have kept control and thus making a stable society. However, capital punishment is the greatest punishment known to man and can only be used in extreme measures regarding an absolute crime such a murder, rape, and in some cultures, breaking sacred laws. With changing times comes changing people and their ways of judgment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is viewed as excessive and harsh, yet the criminal assumed all consequences when they committed the crime as mentioned earlier. This punishment is argued to be morally degrading to some even though there is nothing that can make the crime committed any better morally. The social consequences are effective with the use of the death penalty for the murderer. The murderer has dehumanized themselves by killing another person, so much that they can no longer live among the living. Even though this may be view as inhumane, Hagg still believes that the punishment is warranted.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has existed for centuries, it is a method used to punish criminals or those who do not abide to social rules. By committing a capital crime or capital offence, you can be sentenced to death (also known as capital punishment). This method of punishment was very common in different countries, including the U.S. However, throughout the years, this practice has decreased or was abolished by the government due to different interpretations of this system.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have chosen to conduct on Jill McDonough’s Habeas Corpus book of sonnets. This book widely and deeply talks about the execution of several people through history and adds on how there punishments were determined. The writer Jill McDonough beautifully put historical events in a book in the forms of poems that had clear questions. These poems strongly insist and stand on the aspect of the individuals being executed due to what they stood for. This was created to ensure the reason of their death and is well known.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Do We Need to Understand Capital Punishment? According to the National Academy of Sciences (2014), 1 out of every 25 criminals are wrongfully convicted, yet despite this horrific fact, many countries still impose the death penalty on those found guilty of a serious crime, a punishment that is inhumane, horrible, and goes against all human rights. 140 countries have abolished the death penalty because, it does not serve justice, and it only serves as revenge. Amnesty (International. 2016).…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Punishment for criminal offences is a practice that had been present since the inception of human civilizations across the globe. In ancient times too, people were convicted and punished for committing crimes which encompassed heinous crimes like murder. Though the modes of punishments varied from what are present today, different forms of retribution were thoroughly present in those ancient civilizations. But it must be noted that the entire criminal justice system, today, has changed, and to ensure that no one is unduly punished, the criminal justice systems of different countries across the globe resort to several procedures. Today criminal law has the responsibility to meet several different objectives which ensure that justice is served,…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    More and more countries are turning away from using this, the most ultimate of punishment. In fact only 24 countries executed people in 2014 compared to 42 in 1995. It’s not merely countries choosing not to use it either, it has been enshrined in international treaties. This would appear to indicate that more and more people are finding the death penalty unacceptable, be it for moral or other reasons. In this essay I am going to argue that in certain situations capital punishment is morally defensible and explain why I think this.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is described as a government sanctioned punishment where a person that has committed a crime is put to death by the state. This sentence is commonly used toward people who have committed awfully high offenses such as murder, war crimes, and crimes against humanity and genocides. It dates back to the 1500's where this was seen as the just way of law that made criminals pay for their crimes in front of an entire community. Back then they used methods of hanging, stoning, and lashing these people, their main purpose being one, to maximize the general balance of pain and pleasure towards society. There are certain actions that we can take into our hands and those in which the law plays an important role.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays