History Of Federal Courts

Improved Essays
The court system in our country was created under the influences from the Justinian Code, after the Roman Emperor Justinian I, Napoleonic Code, and the common law of Great Britain. Federal and States courts have separate political jurisdictions and procedures, nonetheless, both were established to solve conflicts. However, court systems are different than police departments, in that courts are in a hierarchy order. When a case is seen at a court, the loosing party can appeal to court with more power and the results can change from those given by the previous judge. In Federal courts the cases are first presented to the U. S. Magistrate, District, and Appeal Courts. State Courts start with Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Trial Courts of General …show more content…
S. Constitution gives Federal Courts authority for judgments. Established on September 24, 1789 The Federal Judiciary Act created 13 courts, one for each colony. Each judge had to go around cities to take care of cases, because it was few laws it was possible, but within time this fact change as population started growing and the need for new laws grew, the quantity of original judges also grew accordingly. At the beginning the U. S. Supreme Court had six justices and much less authority, today there is nine justices, consisting of one chief and eight associate justices. Landmark cases as Marbury v. Madison, under Chief justice John Marshall created : the power to declared congressional and presidential acts unconstitutional--the power of the judicial review—is the most important power of the Supreme Court,”(CJ2015, chap.7, p155)Other courts in the Federal Court System are the U. S. Bankruptcy, Appeals for the Arm Forces, Federal Claims, International Trade, Tax, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance, and Appeals for Veteran Claims Courts. Consisting of four tires of responsibility, Magistrate, Trial, Appeals, and the highest tire the Supreme …show more content…
In 1968 the Unified Judicial System was created, and States changed in how courts were conducted. Structure similarity exist in most State courts, since they all evolve from the British Common Law. Nonetheless, some States as Illinois has revised their system four times to be in accordance with the rest of the Nations courts. State Court follow very similar patrons as the Federal Courts. Most States have a four tire of responsibility, courts of limited jurisdictions, general jurisdictions, intermediate appellate jurisdictions, and courts of last resort. Limited Jurisdiction Courts handle many duties, as lawsuits, permits, marriages, issue search and arrest warrants, setting bails, and arranging defendants. At this courts Judges are paid by local government. Judges of limited jurisdiction are not required to be lawyers, and because the are appointed by by local government the requirement doesn’t have to meet even a high school diploma. Also not required for this courts is to have a prosecutor, meaning that defendants have to present their own cases. This courts do not keep records of trials, therefor if an appeal is done, a trial de novo needs to be done. General jurisdiction Courts are like the workhorse of the criminal

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Federal Court system has three levels: the District Courts, the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. NV judges are elected by the people. In contrast, federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The election of judges in NV creates a conflict of interest with the public in whom they sit in judgment. Judges must raise money in order to fund their election.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discuss the dual court system in the United States, and the structure of the federal court system, and your home state court system. The structure of the American court system has been viewed as complex and confusing as federal and state courts differ in jurisdiction, and types of cases that can be handled at the many different levels. The Supreme Court is the ultimate decision maker in cases that has been appealed regarding decisions made at the lower level of federal and state Supreme Courts. The dual court system operates within the boundaries of the state and federal court systems.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Revolutionary War, the thirteen colonies needed a government to replace the British system they overthrew. The Founding Fathers drafted the Articles of Confederation. The articles were briefly used until citizens began to see its shortcomings. It was just a “firm league of friendship. ”…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The new system created a new level of civil appeals courts throughout the state that would hear appeals from local courts. The cases would only go to the Supreme Court if it could not be resolved in the local…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are the district courts, one of the main courts for trial and handling a large range of cases. There are…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our Federal Court system is primarily composed of three high power jurisdictions that operate much differently than that of the state courts. Federal Courts consist of federal district courts, United States courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States; however, these courts have limitations in cases that solely focus on the Constitution and federal law. Federal district courts are considered general trial courts that consist of over six hundred and seventy-five district court judges nationwide, and they have ranked the lowest courts out of the entire federal court system. United States courts of appeal, however, are ranked second in the system and are composed of six judges on the first circuit and can reach up to twenty-nine…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Influence

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Powers and Influences of the Supreme Court Founding father Alexander Hamilton once stated that he believed that the Judicial Branch would be the weak link of the three government branches. However, the branch is much more powerful than Hamilton could have ever expected. The Supreme Court has a lot of power, including judicial review that helps them be empowered when it comes to checks and balances. They also have the ability to grant a writ of certiorari to have cases sent up for a review.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court structure in the United States is a dual court system. This means that there is a separate federal system and a separate judicial system locally and for each of the states. The United States Supreme Court is the only place where these two systems connect. The courts have jurisdiction which gives them the authority to hear and decide cases. These jurisdictions are composed of the original jurisdiction, which has the authority to hear the case when it is first brought to the courts.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As the highest court in the United States, the Supreme Court has the lawful authority provided Article III of the U.S. Constitution created the Supreme Court and “authorized Congress to pass laws establishing a system of lower courts. In the federal court system’s present form, 94 district level trial courts and 13 courts of appeals sit below the Supreme Court.” This means that regardless of status of status, the Supreme Court has the final decision. The Plethora of Court…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Dbq Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although a majority of documents convey the impression, to be against the Supreme Court having the power to question the constitutionality of federal laws; but the amount of documents that agree, have more solid evidence in their argument. The Supreme Court should have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws. Federalist No. 78, the Marbury v. Madison decision, Article III of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789 are prime examples to prove that the judicial branch has the authority to do so. First of all, in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788; declares that, “[The] courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature...”(Doc D).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you go out and about within our country and you ask people if they knew very much about the United States court system, they will most likely tell you that they do not know very much about the court system unless they have been involved with the court system whether it be federal or state level. Most people do not realize that the court systems have three levels within them or that there is certain situation that will allow you to get to one level or the other. There is a whole lot of information that some people may not know. They may not know about judicial review and how it came about. Some people may not even know how justices decide the ruling of their cases.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judiciary is the section of government which is tasked with interpreting laws passed by parliament. In the USA the constitution established the Supreme Court under article 3 of the constitution. It is the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decisions can only be overturned by a constitutional amendment. In the UK, a supreme court was established in 2009 to provide greater clarity in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. In the UK, under the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty, it is parliament which makes the laws but it is the courts who are tasked with interpreting them.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Form Of Government

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In conclusion, to create the ideal government there must be big changes made to the courts, elections, political parties, and both the executive and legislative branches. It is clear that the current system of government in the US is not effective in all areas. However, it is equally clear that there is no prefect form of government anywhere else in the world. Combining various systems and modification of the current US government would help to create a more complete and better functioning system.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays