Equality In Society In Alexis De Tocqueville And Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Both Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx examine the social change that nations go through either as a result of democracy diminishing Aristocratic ages or because of the wide spread of industrial capitalism. However, Marx and Tocqueville observe the impact of these social changes on the community differently. Marx writings are about how the European world was changing during his lifespan. He observes how the beginning of the Industrial Revolution creates an increase in the level of economic production, but also an immense increase of inequality in a society. On the contrary, Tocqueville analyzes the relationship between equality and liberty during the democratic ages vs. the aristocratic ages. This paper will discuss the differences between …show more content…
He mentions that in the United States, individualism doesn 't lead to tyranny because "they know that the rich in democracies always need the poor and that good manners will draw them more than benefits conferred" (Marx, 1844). He finds democratic people to be weak with just equality and no class power and liberty, and he finds that the only solution to prevent despotism from happening is through bringing people together "voluntary association" (De Tocqueville, 1835). Voluntary association can help the community stay organized, and give people a chance to understand each other while agreeing on rules and laws that will govern their society. Although it may seem similar when Marx suggests that the key to eliminating alienation is also through bringing people together; yet this kind of solidarity is different, it can be referred to as unification according to class, mainly the working class against the bourgeoisie. Marx believes that once the working class gains "class consciousness," they will change from a "class in itself" to a class for itself" (Marx, 1844). This means that workers remain oppressed when they are only concerned with their individual interests of making a living, but once the working class realizes their interests as a whole they will form a stronger union that can overthrow capitalism and enjoy an equal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, to showcase that the proletarians are capable of responding to the bourgeoisie class through occasional revolts, Marx suggests that the proletarians “form combinations (trade unions)” and these will serve as “permanent associations” to riot against the bourgeoisie class (Marx, 166). Therefore, since proletarians are oppressed by the bourgeoisie, the bourgeoisie state, and are enslaved by the machines, Marx suggests a revolution that will physically re-constitute society or result “in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Marx, 159,…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Democracy in America Alexis de Tocqueville According to Tocqueville, “There are only two ways to make equality prevail in the political world: there must be given equal rights to every citizen, or to none” (Pg. 52). Tocqueville in his book Democracy in America highlights the characteristics of the first immigrants to New England who were equally the same, the aristocratic laws that were introduced in the South during the time of the revolution, changes in the laws of succession and the effects produced by these changes, equality carried to its ultimate limits in the new western States and lastly, the equality of intelligences. “The final step to equality involved the law of inheritance” (Pg. 47).…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas each man has a place in an aristocratic society, a man is considered alone in a democratic society. All in all, De Tocqueville has strong opinions regarding aristocratic and democratic societies. Essentially, a democratic society leads men to believe that they stand alone, while aristocratic nations lead men to believe that their actions are done for each other, rather than as a whole. Distinct separation of social and economic classes impacts families within a society. Democracy makes a man stand…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Taking both Veblen and Tocqueville into account, it is easy to detect applications of their concepts in American society today, which can best be described as a modern capitalist civilization in which people are free. America is vivid example of how a nation can hold contradictory values at the same time. Looking at modern day America through the perspective of Tocqueville, he would praise the newfound freedoms and advantages that a democracy would have over another system such as an aristocracy. He would argue that the current state of affairs in America is good, as people in different classes unite to perform different industrial duties to sustain the economy and fulfill their self-interests. In order to fulfill their self-interests they will seek physical gratifications but that is not necessary harmful, as consumption will motivate the capitalist economy forward.…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexis de Tocqueville, a French sociologist and political theorist, wrote multiple books. His books were analysis ' of the improved living standards and social conditions of individuals, as well as their relationship to the market and state in Western societies. His book Democracy in America, was one of the most influential books in the nineteenth century. With its sagacity observations on equality and individualism, Tocqueville’s work remains a valuable explanation of America to Europeans and Americans to…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In analyzing the written works of Jane Addams’ Democracy and Social Ethics and Karl Marx’s Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology, they portray how their theories can impact change within a society. While the basic structure and framework of society of society has remained consistent throughout, there are certain elements of society that are consistently subject to change. These authors address these changes as they pertain their theories to the functions of society. Through the written works of Jane Addams in Democracy and Social Ethics, she takes a particular focus on ethics in communities of society.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Marx responds, “the Bourgeoisie already does this [destroys individuality] for everyone but themselves; the working people of the world must unite” (Mullan, CAL-105-I, 12/07/2016). Marx believes that high class rips free thought away from those who are not rich enough, and to an extend this is true; it is safe to say both systems have their faults and benefits as present times dictates both economies…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This leaves workers to fend for themselves, searching to be recognized that they are the backbones of what has America become. A huge insight of this is the creation and building of the Erie Canal and how the from this abuse arises workers wanting a voice in…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For us to regain the power to the working class, we must re-define what it means for us to be a united body of labourers in this country. Not to be slaves to the all-powerful governing body, rather reinstate an…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the bourgeoisie and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable” (Marx et al. 1848). This is stated to explain the power that both parties hold. The proletariat hold the…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays