Coach Inc. Case Analysis Essay

1703 Words 7 Pages
Coach Inc. Case Analysis

Six years after deciding to be an independent public company in late 2000, Coach Inc.’s net sales had grown at a compounded annual rate of 26 percent and the stock price had increased by 1,400 percent due to a strategy keyed to a concept called accessible luxury. Coach crafted the accessible luxury category in women’s handbags and leather accessories by differentiating themselves on price, but matching competitors on styling, quality, and customer service. The accessible luxury strategy mirrors a focus (or market niche) strategy based on low costs. Coach concentrates on a narrow buyer segment and outcompetes rivals by having lower costs than rivals and thus being able to serve niche members at a lower price.
…show more content…
Management may want to focus attention on regulation on counterfeiting. Counterfeiting has been around for years and account for a 10 percent loss in sales annually, and will continue unless more strict penalties are enforced by host countries Counterfeiting creates large problems for the members of the industry when it comes to integrity and brand name loyalty.

Financial Analysis

Coach’s balance sheet and income statement are in great condition (See table 6.1-6.2). Between 1999-2006, Coach’s sales went from $500,944 to $2,111,501 (quadrupled), while the cost of goods sold went from $226,190 to $472,622 (doubled). Coach stock price has increased 1,400 percent since they became and IPO in 2000. Financial ratios from 2005-2006 were very similar, well above the expected industry standards (See Table 7). In 2006, Coach was very liquid with a current ratio, quick ratio, and working capital of 2.6, 2.17 and $632,658 respectively, indicating they are able to pay off liabilities without relying on inventories. In terms of leverage, Coach is performing very well. As a general rule, a company’s debt-to-equity ratio should be less than 1.0, debt-to-asset ratio should be low, and times-interest-earned ratio higher than 3.0. Coach performs well in all three areas (see table 7), but may have too much cash on hand, and have been taking on more debt every

Related Documents