Greek Vs Arya Case Study

Improved Essays
Zynal Aziz
State of Make-believe vs. Arya

Did Arya commit a battery against Sansa?
In order for the prosecution to prove a battery occurred, the prosecution must prove the defendant had actus reus and mens rea.

Actus Reus

Did Arya have actus reus?
Actus reus consists of a voluntary act, or an omission that causes a social harm.
Was there a voluntary act?
Voluntary means a person consciously acted without any internal or external influences.
The prosecution will argue, unlocking the enclosure, in which an undomesticated wolf was in, proves the action was voluntary because Arya acted on her own accord without any forces influencing her act. When Arya opened the gate, she opened it with a conscious mind. Opening the gate led to the wolf
…show more content…
In order for the prosecution to prove a battery occurred, the prosecution must prove the defendant had actus reus and mens rea.

Actus Reus

Did Arya have actus reus?
Actus reus consists of a voluntary act, or an omission that causes a social harm.
Was there a voluntary act?
Voluntary means a person consciously acted without any internal or external influences.
The prosecution will argue, unlocking the enclosure, in which an undomesticated wolf was in, proves the action was voluntary because Arya acted on her own accord without any forces influencing her act. When Arya opened the gate, she opened it with a conscious mind. Opening the gate led to the wolf escaping, which immediately caused a social harm.
Arya, the defendant, will argue, opening the gate wasn’t a voluntary act to cause a social harm because Arya didn’t physically touch Sansa, so the act of offensive touching never occurred.
Although Arya didn’t voluntarily touch Sansa, she voluntarily opened the gate with a conscious mind, so the physical act of battery occurred.
Was there also an omission? Omission is the failure to act when there is a legal duty. Duty can be established through statues, contracts, special relationship, voluntarily assuming the duty, and when the defendant creates the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Kiara Rivas Philosophy 25 Due Date: 5/6/2015 Mock Trial: U.S v. Dominique Stephens The case I am presenting today is about a woman who admits to having killed her husband and is being charged with first degree murder. The woman’s name is Dominque Stephens and Mrs. Stephens claims that she has acted in self-defense after suffering many years of domestic violence in her marriage.…

    • 2831 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Essay

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examining the brothel boy case, the boy committed an act considered actus reus due to the fact of the force used during intercourse, however, there was no criminal intent of rape and/or causing the head wound…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gender Influences on Altruistic behaviour Altruism or selflessness, When a person or people commit an act with no higher gain or benefit towards themselves then that of assisting another( Psych book). Examples could be a person who donate blood or volunteering for a charity. Even simple acts such as holding open a door or putting change in the charity tins at the supermarket. All these acts are considered part of altruistic behaviour. There has been debate over whether or not true altruism actually exists, many suggest that an individual will always have some sort of benefit from any given action(1).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Regan argues for the treatment of animals to be the same as that of humans. Rather than arguing a utilitarian perspective, Regan posits that an inherent value exists within entities that are what he calls “the subject of a life,” or rather have the ability to perceive and to possess desires and to deprive these entities of their life without sufficient moral reasoning is unconscionable. While humans may be privy to a larger range of cognitive abilities, Regan argues that these talents are superfluous and that mutual respect must be equally enjoyed amongst all subjects of life. This implies that consumption of meat must cease and that subjection to research cannot unilaterally be applied to animals. Opponents to Regan’s stance argue that…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mike and Donald were walking in the park with their wives. A heated argument ensued which evolved into a fist fight. Donald punched Mike in the eye and caused Mike to lose sight in his eye. During the fight between the two, Donald’s wife, Melania pulled off her high heel shoe and began striking Mike over the head causing severe injury. Is a defendant who punches another person in the eye liable for battery?…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self Defense In Maryland

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of Maryland follows the common law when it comes to self-defense: the amount of forced used when defending oneself and the duty to retreat. The definition of self-defense given by the common law is “The right of a person to protect oneself with reasonable force against another person who is threatening to inflict force upon one 's person.” Correspondingly, the duty to retreat is “The doctrine holding that a victim of a deadly assault must attempt to safely retreat before using deadly force in self-defense;” thus, Maryland does not have a stand your ground law. However, if one enters someone’s home or establishment, with the intent to harm them, they are allowed to defend it and do not need to retreat. In the State of Maryland one…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Louisiana, Lillie would be able to recover under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315, which states in pertinent part “Every act whatever of man which causes damage to another obliges him by whose fault it happened to repair it.” La. C.C. 2315 allows someone who has been wronged, to be compensated for the damage caused to him or her. In order to recover under La. C.C. art. 2315, an intentional tort must have been committed. In the present case, Joe has committed the intentional tort of battery. A battery is defined as harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self Defense In Florida

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assault and Battery are two separate criminal charges that carry different penalties. However, the terms could be used together or interchangeably in this instance because they carry the same defenses in Criminal Court. According to Florida law the offense of battery occurs when a person actually unintentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other or intentionally causes bodily harm to another person. Assault is an attempted Battery. In Florida, assault is usually a verbal threat to cause bodily harm nut could be a result of a person who tried to harm someone but failed to do so.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the second, she is not justified at all, honor's law is not higher than state law, and if this were her excuse it would have been better if she had allowed the humiliation to go on. The last argument I will bring up in this essay, is that Polenycius was her brother and irreplacable.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    R V Mulvihill Case Study

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    LEGAL CITATION R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014, Fullerton J ELEMENTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME ELEMENTS- Murder – Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) • Actus rea – An act or omission causing death. • Mens rea – Recklessly indifference to human life, or intention to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lightwood And Rigaud

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to determine whether an individual is criminally responsible, the actus reus which is the voluntary culpable act and the mens rea which is the mental state of mind, the guilty mind should both be present beyond a reasonable doubt during the criminal act (Verdun Jones, 2014, p. 23). According to section 229 (a) of the Criminal Code, in order to be convicted of culpable homicide, the intention to inflict bodily harm that is likely to result in death is required (Verdun Jones, 2014, p. 43). According to the Forensic experts, Lightwood’s death did not result from the injuries when he was attacked by an ice pick but rather from the effect and exposure he suffered from the fall. It is important to determine whether the mens rea of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is when bystanders do not help someone in need (Boss, 2014, p.128). It is typical of human nature because in groups everyone thinks someone else will take care of it. If we can be empathetic to the situation then someone may act accordingly. The argument is that there is a code of ethics that is nonexistent and people may do what is right based on their own belief system. An example could be when a known pedophile in a neighbor fell, as he is very old now and people just walked by him.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Actus Reus Research Paper

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Actus Reus and Mens Reus Actus Reus is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime (Actus Reus n.d.). Mens rea is defined as an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and willfulness (Mens rea n.d.). In criminal law they are referred to as the two elements of a crime and you need both the guilty mind and physical criminal act to prosecute the accused.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays