Theories Of The Case Of Carlill Vs. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Improved Essays
Task 1
Karabo v Simbere
The main issue of this scenario is whether a contract had been formed between the two parties.
The English law of contract explains a contract as a legally binding or valid agreement between two or more parties with the purpose of creating a commitment. Formation of a valid contract must contain the elements; offer and agreement, consideration and Intention. An offer is a definite statement of willingness to be bound on specified terms. Acceptance can be defined as approving to all the terms of an offer (CIMA, 2015). Offer and acceptance should be able to bind the parties, for the two minds to meet also known as consensus ad idem (Merwe, 2003). If the two minds are unable to meet, then it means that the offer will
…show more content…
This is the price she wanted to sell her house at and she did not recommend or expect any further negotiations which in turn regards this as an offer. This relates to the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893). The facts of the case were that the medicinal ‘smoke ball’ manufacturers advertised in a newspaper that if one used the ball properly and still contracted influenza, they would be paid a £100 reward. Mrs Carlill used the ball as directed, caught influenza and sued the company. It was held that Mrs Carlill was entitled to the reward as the advert incorporated an offer of a unilateral contract which she had accepted by performing the conditions stated in the offer. Simbere terminated the offer made by Karabo by making a counter offer of buying the house at P450, 000.00. Karabo refused the counter offer thus terminating the offer but later on went to Simbere to accept his counter offer. Looking at the case of Hyde v Wrench (1840), Wrench the defendant offered to sell a farm to the claimant being Hyde at £1000. The claimant rejected and offered £950 instead which the defendant refused. The claimant later on agreed to the first offer but the defendant refused and the claimant brought an action for specific performance. It was held that the defendant was not contractually bound to the claimant as the …show more content…
This was founded by the case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) which was then decided that it’s principles would be used in future cases that have the same facts. The facts of the case were that Mrs Donoghue being the claimant, went to a café with a friend. The friend bought a bottle of ginger and offered it to the claimant of which she accepted. Only after drinking half of the bottle she found out that the drink had remains of a decomposed snail of which made her suffer health problems. She sued the manufacturer Stevenson as she felt they were liable for negligence. It was held that the manufacturer owed the claimant duty of care and ever since, it was advised that all cases of the same matters should be assessed using this case. If a claimant wants the court to believe that indeed the defendant was negligent, he needs to prove that the defendant owed him duty of care that is the question of whether the defendant had knowledge. If that is proved, then the claimant should prove that the defendant was in breach of that duty and that the breach of duty caused damage. Let us take for instance the case of Caparo v Dickman (1990). Caparo Industries purchased shares in Fidelity Plc in reliance of the accounts which misstated that the company had made a pre-tax profit of £1. 3M when the fact of the matter was that it had made a loss of over £400,000. Caparo sued the auditors claiming they were negligent in certifying the accounts. It was held

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    All parties have full understanding of and are willing to enter into the contract. 5.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 9 Study Guide

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Name three specific cyber issues that have necessitated new laws. 1) Credit card fraud. 2) Cyberstalking. 3) Theft of intellectual property and Identity theft.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Contract 2. Defendant 3. Double Billing 4. Freelance Paralegal 5.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THIS AGREEMENT “Agreement” is made on this ___ day of ____ 20___ between Wayne Wannabe, the President and sole employee of Discount Legal Services Inc., to located at 100 N. Navel Ave., Osceola, Pennsylvania and I. M. King of the law firm of King & Queen, P.A. located at 100 S. Navel Ave., Osceola, Pennsylvania as follows: King &Queen, P. A. agrees to employ Wayne Wannabe for paralegal services for an upcoming trail in the matter of the state of STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SPRINKLE which include discount legal service for legal research and document preparation as well as any other consultation services that maybe necessary. King & Queen P. A. agrees to pay Wayne Wannabe $40.00 per hour which will be billed monthly to King & Queen P. A. for all paralegal services rendered during the time of this contracts…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frannie Bell Case Summary

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question Presented: Whether the statute of frauds bars Frannie Bell from recovering on the oral contract that the parties entered even though the contract lasted more than one year. Short Answer: The statute of frauds does not bar Frannie Bell from recovering on the oral contract that the parties entered into because under the contract Frannie Bell was to receive commission on all contracts for Hannah’s Berries and any renewal contracts for Hannah’s Berries. Due to this the statute of frauds will not bar Frannie Bell even though the contract was oral because the statute of frauds does not apply if the contract could be completed in a year. Although, the contract extended longer than a year, Frannie Bell could have quit at any time.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    External Consultants

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A contract is a legal agreement between two or more parties that contain a mutual agreements that enforceable at the law(Varone, 2012, p. 332).. Contracts can be by word of mouth, in writing, or implied by parties in some cases, whereas though consideration can be an act of promise (Varone, 2012, p. 332-333). In most cases, contracts are started when an offer is made and another party accepts. There is no acceptance when nothing is agreed upon between parties, but is legally binding once agreed upon. Contracts can become in three ways, oral, written, or implied (Varone, 2012, p. 335).…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, many businesses would not have been able to work efficiently without forming an enforceable contract. Generally speaking, a contract is an exchange of promises between individuals. When intending to create a contract, it is significant for both of the parties to recognize when they have entered one, in order to avoid the consequences. Each side of the parties must have a “meeting of minds,” meaning a mutual assent; their needs to be an offer and an agreement to have a legit contract. Also, a consideration is another great factor that makes a contract legally enforceable.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sally's Call Case

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In that case the formulation of the owner’s letter to the prospective buyer stated that the owner ‘may be prepared’ to sell the property to the prospective purchaser. The House of Lords ruled that the letter was not an offer, but rather, an invitation to treat. Lord Diplock observed that the relevant words in the owner’s letter were critical in coming to the conclusion that the letter was but a step in the negotiations for a contract which … never reached…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car? A legal contract should clearly state the terms of reference. For the case of the buyer and the seller, the contract must state the price of the commodity and other details such as the condition of the commodity. For the case of purchasing a car, the sales agreement is a legal contract signed by both the seller and the buyer. For Jim and Laura, they did not sign any legal written document binding them to buy the said car.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was held in Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd., [1953] 1 QB 401 that goods on display are not an offer but, they are an invitation to treat. The customers make an offer to the shopkeeper which he has the right to accept or reject. A cashier accepts the offer under the order of the shopkeeper. A contract is not made until the offer is accepted by the…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The action came on for trial on the counter-claim before Vaughan Williams J., when the liquidator was examined as a witness on behalf of the company, whilst evidence was given for the appellant by himself, and by his son, Emanuel Salomon, one of the members of the company, who had been employed in the business for nearly twenty years. The evidence shews that, before its transfer to the new company, the business had been prosperous, and had yielded to the appellant annual profits sufficient to maintain himself and his family, and to add to his capital. It also shews that at the date of transfer the business was perfectly solvent. The liquidator, whose testimony was chiefly directed toward proving that the price paid by the company was excessive,…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The defendant original wanted to sell a farm for £1000; however the claimant made a counter offer of £950. The Counter offer was not accepted so the claimant subsequently tried to accept the original offer. The defendant then refused to honour the original offer. The claimant bought an action of specific performance against the defendant, but was unsuccessful because as soon as a counter offer is made this immediately voids the original offer in its entirety (Duxbury 2011) and the offerer is not bound by the original offer. Nevertheless due to differentiation of interpretation of language and conduct, both potential outcomes must be analysed and then assessed which course of action would be most…

    • 1534 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professional Contract Formation The idea of creating a contract is to have two or more parties agree to something. This idea is to protect those involved in the exchange. For many circumstances, when dealing with contracts, it can become a hassle, this especially true for agreements without paper written contracts.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Promissory Estoppel Essay

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay seeks to discuss the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel and the Doctrine of Consideration, as well as a clear analysis, with the use of case law, how Promissory Estoppel has become an exception to the general principle that a promise may only be enforced if it is supported by good consideration; it will ultimately conclude whether or not a promise to accept a smaller sum in discharge of a larger sum, if acted upon, is binding notwithstanding the absence of consideration. A contract is a legally binding agreement in law between two or more parties, which is enforced by law or by binding arbitration if it covers the elements of a valid legal agreement. For there to be a valid contract, three elements must be present, offer, acceptance, and consideration. If there is no consideration, there is no contract; however, with promissory estoppel instead of consideration, if there is a promise which induces reliance, the court would find some sort of liability for the promise.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays