Animal Testing: Beneficial Or Inhumane?

Improved Essays
Animal Testing: Beneficial or Inhumane
Is animal testing really efficient or time wasting? It is said that animal testing is unnecessary and purposeless. Would you want your beloved pet to be tested on, go through painful medical procedures, and left for dead? The testing on animals are expensive, consumes a lot of unresentful time and energy, and basically kills animals. “An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing.”

Animals are used to develop medical treatments, find out the toxicity of medications, check the safety for human use, and other health care uses. “The Animal Welfare Act defines “animal” as “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit,
…show more content…
They are confined to empty cages for hours at a time and caused social isolation, and psychological trauma. “The choice is not between animals and humans; it’s between good science and bad science. Between methods that relate directly to humans and those that do not. It is time to switch to humane, effective, and modern non- animal testing methods which don’t cause animal suffering and do offer us the hope of effective medical …show more content…
"Animal Testing Should Be Banned." Teen Ink. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2018.)

The animals are then forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, and inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck breaking or asphyxiation. Plenty of animal lives are wasted, considering all the tests failed not to mention other non- experimental factors that affect animals. There is a significant number of animal lives wasted for nothing.
(16 Integral Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation." ConnectUS. N.p., 19 Aug. 2015. Web. 26 Mar.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    “Each year, more than 100 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing(Using)”. It is estimated that at least 6% of the animals also experience pain. It may not look like a lot, but 6% is a lot when there are more than 100 million animals being tested. According to Orlans, the animals suffer from "vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion, and internal bleeding. Since death is the required endpoint, dying animals are not put out of their misery by euthanasia"…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the animals come to a testing laboratory, they are subjected to many things that will horrify you to imagine, but this paper will go into detail about what they endure so you can have a clear view of what happens to these animals. When these animals are taken to the laboratory for testing, they are commonly subjected to force feeding by tubes and needles, are forced to breathe a certain type of gas that can permanently alter them, and even be deprived of food and water for days while these experiments go on. Not only do they have to go through these things everyday, but they also undergo long periods of physical restraint, infliction or burns and other, sometimes serious wounds so that the corporations that are testing on them can examine the healing processes of these animals. Neck-breaking, decapitation, and infliction of pain, to study effects and medicine remedies are also very common. The draize eye test is also commonly used by cosmetic companies to evaluate irritation caused by shampoos, which involves rabbits being incapacitated with their eyelids held open by metal clamps.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it is arguable that animal testing has benefited all living species as a whole. Serena Holloway, the author of “Controversy: Animal testing” writes “Animal research has helped produced vaccines for rabies, tetanus, parvo virus, and a multitude of other illnesses in cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals. It can be argued that animal research has improved the health of all living species.” Animal testing has also led to prevent extinction for species “ including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil.” (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?)…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassidy Walton Professor Marek English 1101 Sec. 54AZ 6 June 2018 Annotated Bibliography: Animal Testing Animal testing is one of the most frowned upon scientific experiments around, but the whole world needs this testing to save the human race. There are causes and effects just like any other scientific experiments. The testing of animals helps the human race better understand the way animals react to the cures, and to help find cures for the diseases.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the big controversy of animal testing is that it is believed to be cruel and inhumane. It is widely known that there have been experiments with animal subjects where animals have been harmed and mistreated to the point of death, and highlighted the need for some sort of protection of animals, which came in the form of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), but 95% of the animals that are being tested are not protected under the AWA, such as, birds, mice ,and rats who are bred for research, according to http://animal-testing.procon.org/. Another big point of controversy is that there have been cases where they do not show a side-effect that could be seen in a human consumer or they do not actually work on humans, when it is thought to have found a cure. For example, the drugs thalidomide and Vioxx, with the latter causing 27,000 cases of heart attacks and cardiac arrests. Lastly, the cost of using animals in research is higher than using other alternatives, such as the Animal Humane Societies in vitro, which costs around $11,000 to conduct compared to the $32,000 is would cost to do an animal study. Overall the use of animals for research is harmful to the animals who don 't have aren 't protected as best as they can be and is more expensive than using alternative methods to conduct…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy With Animal Testing Animal testing is more of a problem than some believe. Some people believe it is okay to use animals as their test subjects, while others have been trying to convince people that there are alternatives to using animals that will work just as well. “It’s not testing cosmetics. It’s trying to save my life” (Kopp and Camosy 48) said Eileen Youtie who is fighting cancer. Eileen is paying over $30,000 so tests can be done on an animal before the doctors use the drugs on her (48).…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Is Bad

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a website about animal testing, there are several facts that are named, such as these: more than 100 Million animals in US labs around the country are abused, poisoned, burned, and crippled every year. Also, 92% of the experimental drugs that scientists use on animals, are safe and effective for the animals but do not work for humans because they are too dangerous or they did not work. Animal testing is just awful to do because animals do not need to experience so much pain. Scientists should stop testing animals because it is cruel to animals and animals do not deserve to be treated so badly, and animal lives do not need to be put at risk in order to test something. Animal testing is cruel to animals and they do not deserve to be treated…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The large number of animals that suffer is the first thing that comes to the minds of many people when they hear about animals testing. This idea is very true and in fact the animals used in animal testing during and after the year 2000 are rising (Taylor). The amount of animals that are used is not the only concern at play when determining the negative points of animal testing. Some scientists have proved that some methods of animal testing are completely unnecessary because a lot of animals are so genetically and anatomically different from humans that they have different reactions to things than a human would. In those cases people would be gaining nothing from the animals so they would have suffered for…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Cruel and Unjust Life Right now over one million animals are being tortured and tested on throughout the United States. (“Animal Testing 101”) These animals include birds, dogs, cats, bunnies, and so much more. These animals have no protection from the harsh examinations the scientists do with them. They are in inhumane living and have no time to play, like an animal should do.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The testing on animals is a very touchy subject. It makes people wonder whether or not its cruel to advance technology by killing innocent animals. Killing animals for testing has its benefits but it's still inhumane to do that to animals. It can destroy populations of animals if tested often and if every lab has its own supply of animals the populations will drop by extreme numbers. The animals that are tested on often get terrible treatment as the people testing on them know they will soon die.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This shows that even though the united states are using 100 million animals each year. Animal experiments benefits humans with new cures and new treatments. A large expansion reflected a growing medical field. Vitamins, hormones, polo vaccines, cancer treatment, modern advances in immunology, and surgical…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Screams Behind the Creams Did you know that ninety two percent of all drugs that have gone through animal testing have proved to be utterly useless when used with human subjects? Ninety two percent. That is a ludicrously large number. Consider the amount of animals suffering for our personal benefit along with the ridiculous amount of money poured into funding this testing. Not to mention that contrary to a significant amount of peoples beliefs, there are several alternatives to animal testing.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. First of all, there is a huge lack of respect in the industry. According to Dunnuck: "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. . . .This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment."…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction: An estimated twenty six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals make poor test subjects, and animals’ rights are violated. I. Animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays