Pros And Cons Of Nukes

Improved Essays
In president Obama’s speech in Prague in 2009, he said “, Make no mistake: As long as these weapons exist, the United States will maintain a safe, secure and effective arsenal to deter any adversary and guarantee that defense to our allies.” This remark is about nuclear weapons. In his address, Obama made an obvious objection to nuclear disarmament of just the United States, basically saying that it isn’t practical that we give up our weapons until everyone else does. Nuclear weapons, or “nukes” for short, are either bombs or missiles that explode with nuclear energy, just like the bomb that hit Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. According to the Business Insider, there are nine countries that possess nukes; Russia, the United States, China, the …show more content…
Nukes have prevented more major wars and battlefield deaths since World War 2. “Since Aug. 9, 1945, approximately 7 million to 10 million people have died from conflict. Before the introduction of nuclear weapons, two world wars alone led to the deaths of 70 million to 100 million — a difference of a decimal point” (Spalding).So in about a 70 year period 90% less people died in war than in about a 30 year period. Also according to Kenneth Waltz, one of the world’s most respected scholars in international relations, before nukes, the great powers of the world often settled conflict with a full fledged war, but now there are more diplomatic negotiations. But of course, some people argue that a world with nuclear weapons would lead to World War 3. And if the last war was any indication, the US would need a tremendous one up against the enemy in order to prevail again. A big thing in the last World War though, was the unruly civilian deaths. But according to Stratfor Global Intelligence, low yield nuclear weapons exist and if the conflict comes to a stage of requiring nukes, these low yield weapons will solely hit the target and minimize civilian death. It would not be as fatal as Hiroshima. Also, no country wants to initiate a World War 3 like conflict because of the possible outcomes. As long as the US is in possession of nuclear weapons …show more content…
Nukes give the US all of its power in the modern era. Nuclear disarmament will lead to the deterioration of the United States. Since the non-nuclear age, there have been less casualties in conflict and no major global-impacting wars. Some might believe that nuclear weapons will lead to the undoing of the United States, but I strongly believe that with them, we will continue to be the world’s leading superpower. If you care about our country’s well-being then you should care about how nuclear weapons will keep America safe from the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is what I always hope. We already see the power of the atomic bomb, thus, I think having a nuclear weapons can keep us from going to war. Because not every country can make a nucleus weapons. It can protect us.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear weapons should be reduced because the threat of nuclear winter and even worse risks are too extreme. One of the scariest effects of nuclear weapons is nuclear winter. Nuclear winter is when smoke from nuclear explosions gets so dense that it blocks out the sun. This would block out all of the sunlight causing the earth to turn cold, gray, and dry causing plants and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The military also supports the disarmament of nuclear weapons, as nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction, as a small nuclear bomb can wipe out large tracts of land. These are very hard to defend against, as stated, “Bullets kill men, but atomic bombs kill cities. A tank is a defense against a bullet, but there is no defense against a weapon that can destroy civilization. . . Our defense is law and order”15. One of the problems of nuclear weapons is the slippery slope created by the threat of them.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Erika Gregory

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The use and possession of nuclear arms have been debated ever since the United States first put them on display in August of 1945. Countless people have debated the ethics of such weapons and whether or not they should be allowed to exist. Erika Gregory debates this topic in the Ted Talk titled: The world doesn't need more nuclear weapons. The Ted talk is given by the nuclear refermer: Erika Gregory. Erika Gregory argues that the world needs to rid itself of its nuclear arms.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He begins to prove this point by giving example of the various countries that possess nuclear weapons and are continuing modernize them. The US, being the endorser for the abolishment, has a modernization program that will develop to cost one trillion dollars for the next 30 years. Moreover, Russia, China, North Korea and many more countries are also continuing to develop their machinery. Russia and North Korea boosted the size of their nuclear arsenal by stating how they can turn the USA into “radioactive dust”. Therefore, nuclear weapons are also seen as a symbol of national…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear war has been an ongoing battle since 1945 when the first nuclear bomb was created by Robert Oppenheimer. There are many conflicting viewpoints about nuclear weapons. For instance, the article “A World Free of Nuclear Weapons,” by George P. Shultz and William J. Perry, et. al., is against the “tremendous dangers” that nuclear weapons provoke. In contrary, the article “Why Obama Should Learn to Love the Bomb,” by Jonathan Tepperman, explains why we should “love the bomb”.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consequences of these weapons are bigger than anyone could imagine. Communities ruined, cultures lost, innocent lives taken so fast without even a goodbye. In the story “By the Waters of Babylon”, by Stephen Vincent Benét, it gives a general idea of the risks taken by using nuclear weapons. Humanity can be destroyed and everything left and forgotten all because technology overpowers and the States are not prepared for it. By the way that Benét…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission, in a fission bomb, or a combination of fission and fusion, like in a thermonuclear weapon. These weapons help make the world a more safe place, which is exactly why I believe that even though they are expensive, one Trillion Dollars over 30 years expensive, they are a necessary thing for today’s life. The production and use of nuclear weapons provide many jobs, help countries and nations be more or stay powerful, also make people not want to use them in a way. Nuclear weapons let countries maintain power or obtain power through military advantages. The weapons are weapons of mass destruction that nobody wants to mess with, causing other countries to respect the countries and nation that have these weapons.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dangers these weapons create are just too large to go unhandled. The world does not need nuclear weapons and every country should be…

    • 1512 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite years of economic downfall and heavy reliance on Russia and China, North Korea still remains one of the most militaristic societies in the world. North Korea has staked everything they have on their nuclear program, their money, their people, and their relations with the international community. North Korea is a product of the idea that a country can only be safe when it possess a nuclear arsenal, we made this idea come into the world when we dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, however justified we were (“No Exit”). Israel is another example of a country that questionably has nuclear weapons. In his book: “The Golem” , Michael Collins Piper dissects how exactly Israel 's possession of nuclear weapons is a threat to not only to world peace but also to itself.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power is dangerous on many accounts of nuclear power blowing things up and nuclear power and chemicals melting man-made structures to the ground. One of the dangers is that if the government uses nuclear power or nuclear chemicals is the items are so dangerous that it can harm or destroy anything and everything it is used against. In other words the force and the heat that is used for the nuclear items are very powerful. The high sight of using nuclear power is that the United States can use it for good and not for that bad of things like blowing up countries for dominance or for enemy use of power. The U.S. can use it to keep or make the peace of the world now fall apart.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays