Analysis: The Federalist Papers

Great Essays
The Federalist Papers What makes America so unique compared to other countries? For starters, America has a democratic government system, thus, separating itself from the dictatorships and parliamentary systems most governments stem from today. The founding fathers were key contributors in making America what it is today as a world power and pioneer of democracy in having a country ahead of its time, with attention to grand tolerance of people involved in its politics in comparison to other countries across the world. Had it not been for a collaboration of letters published to the American public, the United States may have not been what it is today. These letters published that led to the shaping of democracy in the United States we know …show more content…
Constitution and why this type of government with a stronger but evenly balanced federal government was the best choice for the United States of America. The Federalist Papers were written to help endear those states, unsure of the yet to be ratified U.S. Constitution. The government’s first constitution “The Articles of Confederation” was rushed and flawed in the Federalists eyes in that the Federal Government basically lacked the power to keep the country unified as opposed to the states being territories doing whatever they wanted with no …show more content…
S. Constitution which would give less power to the states in comparison to The Articles of Confederation. The big debate at the time was whether this new Constitution would emulate the type of power England expressed in its unconstitutional taxing which led to the American Revolutionary War, and eventually the United States of America. The Federalist Papers were eventually successful in persuading New York, but that doesn’t mean the authors of such were for all that came with the U.S. Constitution, e.g., The Bill of Rights. The Bills Of Rights are the first ten amendments of the U.S. Constitution, since states needed to ratify the U.S. Constitution like New York would not, in fact, ratify the U.S. Constitution if it had not included some unalienable rights and liberties. These exact enumerated unalienable rights and liberties that were ironically influenced by the English Bill of Rights 1689,among others. The Federalist Papers had a letter as done by James Madison, wholly dedicated to the opposition of this. James Madison felt as though this Bill of Rights was unnecessary due to provisions already in place in the U.S. Constitution, yet as the states Anti-Federalist resilience became clear, James Madison himself scripted these unalienable rights and liberties to mitigate, those of which have become synonymous with American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After the Constitution was written in 1787, many believed that the new government would still be giving too much power to the people running it instead of to the people. A group lead by Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and James Monroe called the Anit-Federalists went against the Constitution because they believed it gave too many powers to congress and did not specify enough human rights. They also believed that the checks and balances system will fair and the executive brach will turn into a monarchy. In fear that the states would not ratify the Constitution, James Madison composed a bill of nine articles of 20 amendments that limited power to congress to be added to the Constitution on July 8, 1789. Twelve of these were selected by congress…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the War of Independence, the founding fathers sought to create a government unlike any that the world had previously seen. With their recent experiences under British rule, the United States did not want a powerful central government; therefore, they created a document in which all the power went to the states, the Articles of Confederation. When this document proved to be weak, the Founding Fathers began to re-evaluate their stance on a central government. This led to the idea of ratifying the United States Constitution. The Federalists, who supported the ratification, attempted to promote the ratification through a collection of essays called the Federalist Papers.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Weaknesses

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many different beliefs on how the government of the United States should be run. The first set of rules, called the Articles of Confederation, was written in 1777, but 10 years later in 1787 the Constitution was adopted. The Constitution replaced faulty laws that didn’t give the federal government supreme power; it set a base for our government that has still proven to be an effective framework for the United States to follow even 229 years later. The Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses like not holding the power to impose taxes and the need for a unanimous vote to pass an amendment, that were resolved by the enactment of the constitution and without it, America would not be the great nation it is today.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second federalist paper was written by John Jay to the people of New York. The title of the paper was "Concerning Dangers from foreign force and influence for the independent journal. " The second federalist paper was divided into sub categories about the United America, constitution and the government. John Jay argued why we should stay united as one and pointed out the way to make that possible was to institute a national government to care for the union and rival the European foreign force in case of any future conflict. John Jay began supporting his position by saying the government was an indispensable necessity.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were very weak, and focused mainly on what the new states’ powers included (which were a little too many). The Articles of Confederation were built quickly to create some form of government. The states of the new-found country had been on their own for so long under their own government (Hennessey 20). With many ideas of a republic, the founding fathers (the same elites from the Continental Congress) met to draft a new government centralized around one main group of men. Out of the meeting, the United States Constitution was formed.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist and anti-Federalist parties disagreed as to how much power the national authority needed, both parties agreed that a national authority was needed and that the national authority would require an individual source of income to function as it should. Both the Federalist and the anti-Federalist Parties also agreed that the people needed protection against dictatorship and other forms of tyranny. Even though neither party completely liked every part of the Constitution, both parties could agree that overall the Constitution was the “best document obtainable”. Federalists were the young, educated men who supported the idea of a centralized federal system and the Constitution’s ratification. They liked the fact that the Constitution could have a “broad interpretation” when situations arose that required such flexibility.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution. In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; “The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands” (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494). He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (Hammond, Hardwick, &…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most persuasive arguments against the bill of rights was that of a shifting burden of proof. At the heart of the concern was that the introduction of such clauses would flip the presumption of the Constitution. As initially written, the Constitution placed the burden of demonstrating federal power to act on Congress and the President. In October 1787 James Wilson argued during the first state ratification debate in Pennsylvania—a discourse that brought him to national prominence as a spokesman for the Federalist cause—that “it would have been superfluous and absurd to have stipulated with a federal body of our own creation, that we should enjoy those privileges of which we are not divested.” By calling out specific rights, there would be a narrowing of rights to reflect merely those listed.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anti- Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty” (Bill of Rights Institute, "Bill of Rights of the United States of America…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison was very important in the framing of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He drafted almost the entire Bill of Rights and helped lay out what was important to the ratification of the Constitution. These huge accomplishments are a part of what has made him so well known in history to this day. Madison is most commonly known to us today as the Father of the Constitution. Since the Articles of Confederation made the U.S. into sovereign states with a weak central government, Congress could not tax and was incapable of paying the debts that were left over from the Revolution.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from. The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and a few other men wrote the U.S. constitution which established basic rights and laws for the national government and its citizens. When the constitution was written, a few changes were needed to be made. These changes were called amendments and the first ten amendments were named The Bill of Rights. It was required that majority of the vote between the states, wanted these changes. Finally, on September 25, 1787, the constitution and it’s first ten amendments were ratified.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays