The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Some medications and vaccines have been created in the past through this testing. A polio vaccine was the result of animal research and testing, which without, polio would still take thousands of human lives each year. “There could have been no oral polio vaccine without the use of innumerable animals, a very large number of animals,” Albert mentioned to a reporter before his demise in 1993. Multiple vaccines being created today need the animal experiments to prove them safe before supplying them to today’s children (Sabin n. pag.). Although this may be true there are other methods of testing. Various medications and vaccines were not created by animal testing. Many of these methods of animal experimentation have not even helped link cancer and smoking. Epidemiological studies, not dealing with animals, linked heart disease and cholesterol. Many of the animal tested medications have been taken off the market or relabeled due to side effects that weren’t shown on the animals. Even the AIDS research using primates has shown a high level of failure. Scientists should use more reliable techniques to do this form of research, such as vitro testing, modeling studies, and clinical research. Animal testing is only used because it is lucrative (Greek n. pag.). Companies are even beginning to realize the issue with the animal testing. For the past thirteen years that Choose Cruelty Free has been up and running, the cognizance of product testing has increased largely, “cruelty-free” lifestyle choices and the behaviors of various companies have also been recognized (Wilson n.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hayleigh Hamrick-Sharp Mrs. Haver English 12 October 27, 2017 Should Animal Testing Continue or End: Most people do not know what goes on behind the scenes of the beauty industry. How do people think they determine whether a product is safe for a human or not? Animal testing is the most used method of testing products. There are many things people don't know about the method and there are many people against it.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    considering they were “God’s creation” as some will say (Monamy 10). On the contrary, British Lord Chancellor Francis Bacon thought that animal testing is an excellent way to learn more about our bodies and how it works (Monamy 10). However, this controversy made animal testing rise. An additional amount of scientists started using different types of animals such as monkeys, rats, birds, dogs, cats, and the list goes on and on. With animal testing in use, scientist found out how the digestive, respiratory, nervous, muscular, etc.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Picture this, you’ve just came home from the mall and you’re going to try on that brand new moisturizer, cosmetic or vitamin supplement. Then suddenly, your skin begins to flare up with inflammation, your tongue itches or you begin to have strange pains. Yet, according to the bottle, these are just minor side effects. Imagine what bigger side effects people had to face during human trials to perfect that product. Or worst, what animal had to suffer the consequences in order to ensure the safety of that human product.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate surrounding the use of invasive animal research has been ongoing throughout history. Proponents of the practice are quick to point out the multitude of benefits that have emerged from the practice such as the cures and vaccines to major diseases such as polio, and their capacity to continue to do so in the future. Opponents often claim that the moral status of these animals deem it morally impermissible to do any time of research that can harm them, no matter what the benefits for humans may be. This is especially true in the argument against invasive chimpanzee research. Chimps share similar genetics with humans and have been shown to exhibit an array of emotional responses similar to those of humans, but this does not necessarily…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Insulin for diabetes was found from experiments where dogs had their pancreases removed. The polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 in 2012, (World Health Organization, “Poliomyelitis”,who.int). These have been benefits of animal testing since they get to find a cure or vaccine to help decrease a disease. It may be true that animal testing has helped us a lot, the fact that animals…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal testing is one of the most controversial topics today. However, with the astounding biomedical advancements that animal testing has helped with, the many regulations that keep tested animals safe, and the widespread acceptance and endorsement of animal testing in many well-known organizations and companies, it is crazy to think that anyone could oppose such a helpful and safe process. Animal testing has a wide range of benefits, that help better…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Effects

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Effects in the United States. Albert Sabin, who developed the Polio vaccine said, "Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Recent studies show an estimated 26 million animals are used for testing. Humans have been testing on animals for centuries. Aristotle and Erasistratus are among the first to perform experiments on living animals, without forgetting Galen who practiced vivisection.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, there is no reason to continue animal testing due to the faulty results that do not benefit anyone, but the companies themselves, who neglect to correctly conjecture the chemical substances. Unfortunately, animal testing also has many biological and physiological limitations, which lead to undesirable results, unexaminable conditions, and eventually more pain inflicted to the animals. A simple cladogram can show that even though animals and humans are in the same kingdom and family, our detailed genus, order, and species diverges greatly. Subsequently, a recent study shows that it is virtually impossible to assess in animals the risk of a product causing a slow developing disease in people, as their lifespan is much shorter than a human’s lifespan (Animal Aid Organization 1). However, cosmetic companies and their researchers still continue to wrongfully test on animals whilst ignoring this detrimental difference, which in the end will strongly affect the animals and even mankind.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is the use of animals in order to determine the safety of a newly invented product, mainly medicine, drug and cosmetics. Animals are the perfect models to test on since they are similar to humans in some ways and to a certain degree, they can predict the potential effects of a product. However, during the process of testing, animals are brutally neglected and are treated with almost no care. Such practices are inhumane; thus, in 1959 Russell and Burch published The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, which introduced the idea of the 3Rs principle — replacement, reduction, and refinement. This idea highlights the treatment that animals should receive in an experimental setting, and gradually it promoted the development…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Pros

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another alternative to animal testing is of course, human testing. This alternative however, is not wildly used since animals can be acquired faster and are disposable unlike a person. The animals are also easier to handle, being most of the animals used for testing are rats and mice. Unfortunately, most animals are kept in captivity and are killed as soon as the test is done. Human testing would also give more efficient result since the test is used directly on a person rather than an animal.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a highly controversial argument of using animals for scientific or commercial testing. Chimpanzees have 99% of their DNA in common with humans; furthermore, mice are 98% comparable to humans on a genetic level. The United States and Gabon are the main two nations that permit experimentation with chimpanzees (ProCon.org). “95% of animals” utilized in experimentation are not “protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish” (ProCon.org). Based on my research and my own personal experience, I found that there are several pros and cons.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An easy solution to animal testing are the numerous alternatives that are already available: • Organs on a chip: This was created by Harvard’s Wyss Institute. The idea is to contain human cells grown in a high-tech system to imitate the structures and functions of the body systems and organs (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1). The chips can be used to replace animal testing in areas of disease research and drug testing, it has also been shown to duplicate human anatomy, infections, and drug responses more accurately than animal experiments do (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many animals die each year from animal testing. I don’t approve of companies testing on animals. I don’t approve of it because they could end up killing the animals they’re testing on. I think people should use other things to test on other than animals or people. Most fumes are toxic to the animals they test on.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal experimentation has made many breakthroughs in modern medicine since it’s been used, but is it really worth the millions and millions of helpless animals that scientists imprison, test on, and murder every year? As many as a million animals are stuck inside of small cages in American laboratories at this moment, scared for their lives after watching the previous animals get tortured and then immediately killed after they were tested on. Almost every animal that goes through the testing experience has not and probably never will feel what it’s like to be outside in the grass, running around freely in the sun, nobody restraining them from moving, nobody sticking them with endless needles filled with things that neither humans or the animals…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "A righteous man has regard the life of his animal..." Proverbs 12:10 (1). Not even the word of God has stopped the animal cruelty that occurs in labs across the world. Despite all the proof and moral evidence provided, scientists continue to use defenseless animals for not only experiments for the good of mankind, but also for cosmetics tests and other nonessential products. Not only are these acts morally wrong, but they also have been, on many occasions, proven to be ineffective, and even though there are better, safer ways to experiment, animal cruelty continues to be the first choice when testing products. While scientists continue to run experiments and tests on innocent creatures, people across the world acknowledge how awful it is.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays