1 Scientific Justification on Animal Testing with Alternative Solutions The pursuit of scientific advancement has subjected a variety of animals to unfair, unnecessary cruel treatment. Will society continue to justify ineffective animal testing to some form of illegitimate, imprecise data or are there alternative solutions available? Researchers have long involved animals to create some form of legitimate scientific evidence because our bodies share outstanding physiological similarities. Scientist has continually used ineffective methods to categorize their research, current laws are ineffective to implement any form of real change, considering alternative research methods can be a crucial form of advancement in scientific testing. Will alternative research methods solve for moral, scientific and regulatory problems? When considering animal testing it is important to take into account current animal regulations which affect the experiments that involve animals, for example, the US Animal Welfare Act. Currently, regulations based on moral standards which try to reduce pain and distress which are ineffective due to each individuals definition of these qualities. In “The
…show more content…
Toxicology test has proven to have high ineffective testing methods. No current framework implemented allows a form of shareable data other than a scientific publication to allow ineffective testing methods. Researchers continue to research methods that have maybe been identified or tested. Animal testing cannot continue to be consider effective even though it has proven some form of valid scientific solutions. Basing regulations on pain and distress proves to be too broad, many other alternative research methods have proven effective but the biggest challenge will be shifting framework and scientific perspective that can be solved through these movements on testing with a change of
Toxicology test has proven to have high ineffective testing methods. No current framework implemented allows a form of shareable data other than a scientific publication to allow ineffective testing methods. Researchers continue to research methods that have maybe been identified or tested. Animal testing cannot continue to be consider effective even though it has proven some form of valid scientific solutions. Basing regulations on pain and distress proves to be too broad, many other alternative research methods have proven effective but the biggest challenge will be shifting framework and scientific perspective that can be solved through these movements on testing with a change of