Response To Peter Singer On Animal Rights And Consciousness

Improved Essays
A Response to Peter Singer on Animal Rights and Consciousness Long has the world and its popular philosophy considered animals to be mere things, mere living objects; lacking essential consciences, devoid of personhood. Humanity, however, has changed and is continuing to change, drastically. Knowledge is rapidly increasing, culture extensively expanding, and philosophy dramatically changing; thus, the personhood and, by extension, rights of animals is subsequently being reexamined. A leader, if not the leader of this reexamination is the philosopher, Peter Singer, who’s life journey lead him to believe that animals deserve equal consideration with humans, and greater rights than what they currently possess. Like Singer I feel animals should …show more content…
He went on to obtain a degree in philosophy in 1969, eventually writing his most prominent work, Animal Liberation in 1975 and soon returning to Australia to become appointed professor of philosophy at Monash University (Britannica.com). After some time, Singer was appointed Director of Bioethics at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University and in 2005 was also appointed Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne …show more content…
While scientists are yet to discover what makes humans have this essential consciousness, or if all humans even have it (though most suspect others do), there is a significant difference between human brains and the majority of animal brains, and that difference is mirror neurons. Mirror neurons allow humans to experience what others feel. It’s why when you see someone break their femur or get hit in the groin you can almost feel the pain along with them; the neurons are also responsible for an essential part of the human character, sympathy (brainfacts.org). A defining characteristic of psychopaths is the lack of sympathy; those who appear to lack sympathy are often considered by others to not qualify as humans, but rather monsters, mere animals, such as Doctor Mendeleev, Stalin, Joseph Albert, and many more. Many of these people grew to become unsympathetic, without compassion, but most not human creatures are born without it due to their lack of mirror neurons; explaining the almost unbelievable cruelty we see in nature such as birds stealing other bird’s young for food, hyenas gutting and eating antelope alive, not caring to first kill it to end its suffering, and even though some animals like lions who critically damage a prey’s neck first

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his essay Animal Liberation, Peter Singer advocates for a basic principle of equality, regardless of differences between humans and non-humans. When postulating this approach, Singer compares the suffering of historically oppressed people such as African Americans and Women to that of animals today. To expand, Singer advocates for a liberation movement for animals, a movement that will help us explore our moral horizons, then leading us to acknowledge unethical and unjustifiable practices. Basically, what was once regarded as natural, will now be seen as unjustifiable prejudice (Singer Pg. 802)…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer, an animal liberator, argues that animals should have rights because they have the ability to experience suffering. One of the scenes shows how a baby elephant is finding it difficult to sleep at night: the elephant was having a nightmare of how his mum was killed, which had become a trauma for the elephant. This shows that elephants have the memory of everything that happens to them, which can sometimes lead to suffering.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay, “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals,” Peter Singer argues that the standard for having a right to get equal consideration as others is the species’ “capacity for suffering and enjoyment” (205), and therefore, a species which satisfies the standard should be protected from speciesism. Speciesism is “a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species” (204). Singer states that many people’s voices arguing that intelligence cannot justify racism and sexism bring speciesism towards animals into…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For his part, Peter Singer says we should think about the treatment of non-human animals in terms of an equal consideration of interests, which means that identical…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, we would not negate any service to another person that is not literally equal to ourselves. Everyone has different biological traits whether it be skin tone, sexuality, or mental capacity yet we all see each other as equal human beings, why can't animals be a part of that? It is important to note that Singer does not want the same right for animals as humans but that it would depend on the animal itself the same way men don't have the right to an abortion because they physically don't have the ability to have one. This extension of equality to other animals in Singer's eyes is seen as the moral obligation that we as animals…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that it is morally unjustifiable to kill and eat animals for our own pleasure and as food. I personally agree with Singer’s argument that it is wrong to kill other species, using them merely as a means to our end because I firmly believe that their interests in not suffering is parallel to humans interests in not suffering. Animals are sentient beings, meaning that they experience both pain and pleasure as we do. Singer approaches this argument from a Utilitarian perspective, implying a principle of equality. Utilitarianism states that the moral worth of an action depends entirely on its contribution of maximizing the total happiness or pleasure among all people while minimizing the total pain or suffering.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that all animals are equal and that it is not right to eat or kill animals. For the reason that animals are capable of feeling pain and pleasure, they matter and we should consider them as equals. I agree with Singers point of view as an utilitarian, we are morally obligated to make more pleasure than pain, we can’t validate killing and eating animals because they taste good. Singer states that not all humans are equal in a factual sense and that we all have different mental capabilities and different sets of morals.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Name: Georges Maljian Topic: Animal Rights General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience should acquire a better understanding of why animals should have rights and treat them the same way they treat one another. Thesis: Sharing most of the same feelings and emotions we do, animals are not ours to use for entertainment, eat, experiment on, wear, or abuse in any other way. Introduction:…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer’s argument towards approaching the principle of equality beyond our own species is straightforward. He said it corresponds to a clear understanding of the nature of the principle of equal consideration of interests. It has become clear that the implications of this principle is that our interest for others should not revolve around their capabilities they retain. It is built on this facet we are able to say that the evidence that some people are not members of our race does not entitle us to abuse them, and similarly the fact that some people are less resourceful than others does not mean that their concerns may be disregarded. Peter Singer published Animal Liberation in 1975 which has been mentioned as a leading prompt on leaders…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    New York: Ecco Press, 2000. Print. Singer, Peter. 'Animal Liberation '. Animal Rights: The Changing Debate.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays