“A fair trial is one in which the rules of evidence are honored, the accused has competent counsel, and the judge enforces the proper courtroom procedures - a trial in which every assumption can be challenged,” said Harry Browne. In the courtroom, there can only be a fair trial when the different pieces in the courtroom work together in an honest, legal and fair matter. The judge acts as the mediator in the courts and decides what evidence is admissible. The jury helps to decide the verdict of cases. The prosecutor presents evidence to prove the accused guilty. The defense attorney tries to find flaws in the prosecutor 's evidence to show their client cannot be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Alongside the main players in the court,
…show more content…
The overseeing of a trial process, which includes controlling how the other players in the court conduct themselves, settling disputes about evidence and the procedures, and helping in the process of questioning a witness, is the main job of judges across the country at any level they serve (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). On a trial to trial basis, when working alongside a jury, the judge’s job is to notify jurors on what evidence is proper and what evidence alongside laws must be brought into consideration when reaching a verdict (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). During bench trials, where there is no jury, the judge 's job is to not only keep order in the court, settle disputes on evidence and procedure, and participate in the questioning of witnesses, but also must act as the jury in that they must decide if the offender is innocent or guilty, and what their sentencing will be (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). At the federal level, judges help to “serve the public, directly shape the law, and develop the minds of subsequent generations of attorneys through the …show more content…
You are an advocate for one client, just as the prosecutor is the advocate for one client, the state” (Susteren, 1996, p.127). The responsibility of a criminal defense attorney, within the guidelines of the Constitution, the law, and the “codes of professional responsibility,“is to do all that they can for their client to defeat the prosecution 's case no matter how guilty their client is, what their client has done, or how well the prosecutor has presented a case against their client (Susteren, 1996, p.127). While in court, defence attorneys are the main motivators in the adversarial procedure, which is the procedure for the determination of truth in the pronouncement of guilt, where the prosecutor and the defense attorney are against each other and the judge as the mediator between the two with the use of legal rules (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.173). The defense attorney, in this debate, must repudiate the evidence of the prosecutor in a way that shows their case cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a way that is legal, ethical, and constitutional (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.173). Attorneys tend to do this through looking for flaws in the prosecutor 's evidence and procedures, and then informing the jury of these flaws (Susteren, 1996, p.128). Criminal defense attorneys, like every other citizen,
The overseeing of a trial process, which includes controlling how the other players in the court conduct themselves, settling disputes about evidence and the procedures, and helping in the process of questioning a witness, is the main job of judges across the country at any level they serve (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). On a trial to trial basis, when working alongside a jury, the judge’s job is to notify jurors on what evidence is proper and what evidence alongside laws must be brought into consideration when reaching a verdict (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). During bench trials, where there is no jury, the judge 's job is to not only keep order in the court, settle disputes on evidence and procedure, and participate in the questioning of witnesses, but also must act as the jury in that they must decide if the offender is innocent or guilty, and what their sentencing will be (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.164). At the federal level, judges help to “serve the public, directly shape the law, and develop the minds of subsequent generations of attorneys through the …show more content…
You are an advocate for one client, just as the prosecutor is the advocate for one client, the state” (Susteren, 1996, p.127). The responsibility of a criminal defense attorney, within the guidelines of the Constitution, the law, and the “codes of professional responsibility,“is to do all that they can for their client to defeat the prosecution 's case no matter how guilty their client is, what their client has done, or how well the prosecutor has presented a case against their client (Susteren, 1996, p.127). While in court, defence attorneys are the main motivators in the adversarial procedure, which is the procedure for the determination of truth in the pronouncement of guilt, where the prosecutor and the defense attorney are against each other and the judge as the mediator between the two with the use of legal rules (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.173). The defense attorney, in this debate, must repudiate the evidence of the prosecutor in a way that shows their case cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a way that is legal, ethical, and constitutional (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p.173). Attorneys tend to do this through looking for flaws in the prosecutor 's evidence and procedures, and then informing the jury of these flaws (Susteren, 1996, p.128). Criminal defense attorneys, like every other citizen,