To Kill A Fetus Research Paper

Great Essays
Mary Troxell
Muenzberg
November 28, 2016
PHI 202-02

Approximately 3,000 babies are aborted each day in the United States, according to the Abortion Index. You can terminate a fetus 's life either by procedurally removing the fetus from the mother or taking a pill. Generally, it is defined as a medical procedure performed by a physician who takes a fetus from its mother, cutting off nutrients, air, and essentially, all life from their innocent body. This may produce a graphic image within your mind, but it accurately depicts an abortion, killing an innocent life. Abortion is politically, religiously, and personally debated among American citizens. Many people who obtain pro-choice views argue that a fetus is not yet a “person” and therefore,
…show more content…
That infant, bearing malice or tragedy, will become a specific human adult (hereafter ‘the relevant adult’). I will assume that this relevant adult is normally functioning, and hence that the fetus has a future like that of a normal adult. On this assumption, it seems the fetus would be deprived of a future-like-ours if killed.” He explains that even fetuses have futures and opportunities ahead of them, and couples or mothers should not decide their baby’s fate. Every human being deserves a future, taking that away from anyone can cause pain and harm.
In Don Marquis’s article, Abortion Is Immoral, he argues, “The loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one 's future.” Both Don Marquis and Eric Reitan explain the importance of someone 's life, fetus or not. If you kill a human being you are committing the crime of not allowing them to have a future and not being able to experience the world. Fetuses deserve just as much opportunities than an infant or an
…show more content…
People will always be in disagreement with such a controversial topic. Pro-life or Pro-choice, many times people cannot change your opinion. Abortion is not morally right because fetuses are considered human beings and deserve basic human rights. In the book, Injustice, Inequality and Ethics, by Robin Barrow, Barrow explains that there are always different viewpoints regarding abortion. There is the view that the fetus has a right to live, and there is a view that it 's the mother 's choice to do what she wants with her body. Rarely, can we change someone 's view on something they firmly believe or support. Barrow states, “Our tasks is precisely to challenge and critically consider all and any such viewpoints.” Barrow wants people to understand that they may not change someone 's opinion on this matter, however, they should challenge the opposite viewpoint while considering their argument as well. Taking an innocent adult, child, or fetus, is not acceptable, and is morally incorrect. Fetuses are human beings who should have basic human rights, therefore, without the mother at risk of complications, terminating their life is ethically and morally

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Because of the moral standards of society, abortions are becoming a more controversial issue. In this paper, I intend to argue against Don Marquis’s argument that a fetus’ having a potential “future just like ours” is a sufficient statement for claiming that “abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (p.183). I will first explain Marquis’ “future just like ours” theory which is used to prove his argument that abortion is wrong. While Marquis claims that a future is a natural property that is attached to fetuses and any human beings, I want to argue that there is a difference between future and the natural property. Second, I want to argue against his statement…

    • 1515 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Robertson and Schulman, p. 752). The rights of the mother should not completely be diminished because of the child’s welfare. Yet, the fetus has the right to be born healthy. We have to respect the mother’s wishes, but also the fetus’s wishes to remain healthy. Also, Minkoff and Paltrow have opinions about pregnancy and prenatal harm.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people tend to focus their argument on the life of the fetus without putting no value to the life of the mother. Personhood is the condition of being an individual person, aware of self, and be able to think. Fetus does not have consciousness, cannot think, and is dependent to the mother, therefore, it is not constitute as a person. The Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution does not include the unborn as a person. Every choice we make in life comes with a decision which is governed by individual rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living in a world filled with people of different cultures, religions, and personalities, it is impossible to think that with every situation that presents itself in American that mutual agreement upon it will be made. In the news, we constantly hear debates about gay-marriage, police brutality, racism, and many other incidents in America that bring out the inner activists of our people. Most debates over these controversies are no surprise to the public because they have been going on for years. One in particular is the debate about abortions. Since 1973, the world has been divided into two distinct groups of “Pro-life” and “Pro-choice” due to the landmark case of Roe v. Wade.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Morgentaler, president of Humanist Association of Canada, says “Even if you have a hundred bricks, or two hundred bricks, it is not yet a house. For it to be a house it needs walls, plumbing, electricity, and a functional organization. The same is true for a developing embryo.” (Morgentaler). They believe the fetus is not a human yet and therefor abortion is not terminating life it is merely terminating a cell.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marquis argues that killing a fetus deprives it of a valuable future/future like ours, and concludes by saying abortion is not morally permissible. I agree with Marquis’ argument that it is wrong to kill a fetus through abortion because I believe that they have a valuable future as all humans do. While I agree with Marquis that majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral, I do believe that in some cases it is permissible. For instance, choosing to have an abortion after being sexually assaulted or due to life threatening circumstances would be acceptable reasons for having an abortion. Being that the loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses that can occur, I strongly concur with Marquis’s argument.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When looking at human life from a moral point of view, can a fetus be considered a…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I argue that abortion is prima facie morally wrong. Prima facie morally wrong means that the action at first is wrong, however sometimes there are ways to override its wrongness. My primary goal is to demonstrate that abortion, or killing a fetus, is prima facie morally wrong for the same reason that killing an innocent adult human being is morally wrong. I will also explore an objection to my claim and discuss my rational for why it fails to refute my argument. I believe it is prima facie morally wrong to kill an adult human being primarily because it denies them of a “future like ours” (Marquis, 1989).…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many circumstantial situations, which should be acknowledged while making the choice whether one should proceed with terminating a pregnancy. Although it’s easy to make an opinion on how morally and ethically disgusting it is to murder just a child, there will never be proof that the fetus instead a woman’s body is a living being. Instead of judging these women for their choices, one should put themselves in their shoes and see just how much of an impact the choice of abortion or no abortion can make. All women deserve a second chance. It should be permitted to allow women to decide for themselves based on the impacts on themselves, their family and their unborn child, whether or not an abortion would be the best…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A human life begins start at the time of the conception. A children does not deserve to be kill for the irresponsibility of their parent. According to Life Site News, "Abortion is a defining human-rights issue of our time.." (Ricker 1). Everyone stands up for their own human rights, but when it comes to abortion no one stands up for the baby’s human rights.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays